SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: C&C 40 or Soverel 41 Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Already pinged:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-26-2014 04:13 AM
Re: C&C 40 or Soverel 41

Thanks, everyone, for your recent responses. I was directed to it just now looking for more info on a C&C 38, and to my surprise, I found and reread my own old post.

I am in fact the original poster (I let my membership lapse ten years ago over the extraordinary snarkiness of this same this-thread-is-dead garbage when I "revived" my own "dead" but still-relevant thread).

So my question to the sailnet moderators and the community as a whole is: If a thread is dead, and it's no good anymore, why keep it on the server?

Or if it is kept alive because it still has worthwhile info in it, why can't we comment on it?

What's the harm?

Thanks, all.
05-14-2012 08:57 PM
Re: C&C 40 or Soverel 41

I know ded im thinking about a Soverel 35 seams to need only cosmetics
01-24-2008 09:15 PM
Not dead just sleeping

I'm trolling through the forum looking for info on various boats - most of them older boats - so if the key words I use in my search come up it's bingo!!! Regardless of the age of the thread it's still useful (sometimes).

Thanks forum contributors.

05-21-2007 03:51 PM
BADG Psst, hey Soverel48, this is the second time that you've responded to a 3 year old post. This one is D*E*D, ded.
05-21-2007 02:13 PM
Soverel 48

In response to the earlier questions about Soverel 48s; the boat handles extremely well in light to moderate air. It is very responsive and often feels like a dinghy with its manueverability. It will easily do 8 knots in ~15 knots of wind on any kind of a reach. I have not experienced anything beyond moderate conditions with it at this point. Only latter hull numbers had any foam at all in the hull. (Hull #14 has some cored areas, but I was told they were limited to above the waterline.) Only a very small portion of the decks have core material, limited to some areas above the house only. Relative to ocean passages; I will withhold comment until I can stop working on it long enough to do that. Either it is real good at that, or I have wasted a lot of time trying to get ready!

Originally Posted by Chas..F
After listening to a friend rave (he''s an excitable type) about his Soveral 48 with a 9,000(?) bronze centerboard, and about all soverels in general, I started looking at a Soverel 41 K/CB for sale near me.

I also have noticed a C&C Crusader 40 K/CB for sale on Yachtworld. They seem similar outwardly, except the C&C has a shorter waterline. Does anyone know the construction materials and overall build quality for these two boats? (The Soverel 48 was reputed to have a lightweight, sturdy foam-cored hull.)

And can anyone comment on their sea motion and seaworthiness? Are either of these boats up to ocean passages?

03-05-2007 12:10 PM
sailingdog You do know that you're responding to a thread that was pushing up daisies for almost three years..
03-05-2007 10:14 AM
Soverel 48

FWIW, The earlier Soverel 48s had solid hulls. I know for sure hull #s 1 through 4 have solid hulls which have stood up very well over the years. Hull #14 has some core in the hull. I do not yet know the construction of the other hull numbers. Some boats were built with center boards while others were not. The 5 foot draft makes these boats very disirable for Bahamas cruising. The sailing qualities of the 48 are very surprising for such an old design. Anyone seeking more info on the Soverel 48 cxan go to:

Steve Gould

Originally Posted by Chas..F
Thanks, Jeff.

To your knowledge, are both of these boats solid glass? If cored, with what?

07-19-2004 07:45 AM
C&C 40 or Soverel 41

The web-site contains most of the original C&C brochures, which should tell you how the 40 is cored. That model may have been made before they widely started using balsa coring.
07-16-2004 07:38 AM
C&C 40 or Soverel 41

Thanks, Jeff.

To your knowledge, are both of these boats solid glass? If cored, with what?

07-15-2004 08:52 AM
C&C 40 or Soverel 41

Both of these are odd ducks. The C&C Crusader was a reasonably well constructed reasonably good sailing boat. I raced against one called ''Old Blue'' that did quite well under PHRF. They were at their best in moderate winds in races with ling beats and long downwind legs. They were designed at a time when C&C was a world class design firm but a lot has happened since that time. The Crusaders tended to be a little on the rolly side.

Soverels were extremely ideosyncratic boats. Build and finish quality varied depending on what part of the boat you were evaluating. They had quicky details and very simple layouts, rigs and engineering. They tended to have good ventilation and comfortable berths. They tended to rely on form stabilityt more than was popular at the time and so have slightly snappy motions.

Neither boat is much of an offshore cruiser and neither are very well suited to the lighter winds usch as are typically found along the center of US east coast. An example that was in good condition could go offshore, ideally picking its window, but these boats are somewhere between 35 and 40 years old and so would need a lot of attention from you or a prior owner if you planned to take one offshore for more than short hops.


This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome