SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
11-29-2009 11:06 AM
Mechsmith My boat was done this way from the factory. Hinge on cabintop thru bolted to a stainless tube that is a "compression post" that is keel mounted. Entirely satisfactory so far.
06-30-2007 12:48 PM
CapnHand Fiberglass (GRP) is very strong in tension but not so strong in compression. It's not the best choice for a compression post.

The advice of a marine acrchitect / engineer should be sought. Modifications to the deck, chainplates and standing rigging would likely be required. If your only reason for doing this is cost, it may be cheaper to replace the mast.
06-30-2007 11:17 AM
Rickm505 On smaller boats, one of the advantages to deck or cabintop stepped masts is that the mast and chainplates can be designed so the mast can be lowered and raised without a crane. My boat utilizes a tabernacle and is rigged in this manor. The chainplates are extended off the deck to match the height of the swivel bolt in the tabernacle.

I would imagine this advantage disappears as the boat length increases much over 30' as that dang mast is heavy!!

Rick in Florida
06-29-2007 06:18 PM
sailingdog You'd really need to talk to a naval architect or marine engineer to get a good idea of how to go about making this modification to your boat. I don't know whether JeffH ever had the boat modified to that end or not.
06-29-2007 05:47 PM
re:Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts

Jeff H,
I read with particular interest your comments on the thread "Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts". I have an Islander 37 sloop whose mast was crushed on the bottom 3 feet by an errant boat hoist operator. You mentioned that your next boat would be a keel stepped mast which you would modify to a deck stepped mast. I would be very interested in what modification you undertook to accomplish this. To quote you "My preferred set up is a deck stepped mast that has a welded flange on its bottom that is through bolted through the deck into the top flange of a structural jack post. The boat that I am buying has a keel stepped mast. It is my intent to pull this mast and have it modified to that arrangement."
I am strongly considering the same modification, although using a fiberglass structural jack post to prevent rust, rot and other assorted maladies with a stainless steel flange on top and bottom of the cabin for connection. I am interested especially on how much side loading I should anticipate on the deck to gauge the structural additions I should add. Any input you have would be appreciated.
11-08-2001 07:19 AM
Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts

I personally strongly prefer a deck-stepped mast over a keel stepped mast but once again this is an area where opinions can differ widely. There is no right answer here. There is a contingent that thinks that the only proper way to step a mast is on the keel. There is a logic to that but it is a logic that can be engineered around and which comes out of a historical context that is less relevant with modern materials.

To start with the basics, the base of a mast has a vertical and horizontal thrust to it that tries to push it down through the bottom of the boat and also sideward off of the mast step. In normal conditions the down load is several times greater than the side load. Beyond the loads imparted to the boat, there is also the issue of the loads that happen internally in a mast. When you look at the structure of a mast it is really a truss standing on end but it does not completely act as truss because the components of a truss are not supposed to have bending loads on them. Ideally the loads in the mast are primarily axial (acting along the length of the mast) rather than in bending (acting perpendicular to the long axis of the mast). Of course masts do have fairly large bending loads imparted into them. The two most often cited reasons for keel stepped masts being considered stronger is the way that the bending loads (moments) are distributed within the mast itself and the way that the mast imparts its loads into the boat.

If the goal of designing a mast is to reduce bending moments within a mast, the greater the number of panels (segments between shrouds and other supports) the smaller the moments tend to be. In the days when single spreader rigs were most common a keel-stepped mast added one extra panel, the segment between the mast partners at the deck and the keel. This has become less significant as bigger boats have routinely gone to multiple spreader rigs and moment connections at the deck mounted mast steps.

In terms of the way that the mast imparts its loads into the boat, masts are generally located in the area of the cabin trunk and because of the shape of the cabin (i.e. the deck folds up at the cabin side and horizontal again at the coach roof) this area, if not engineered for side loads is more prone to lateral flexing than would be the keel. One idea behind a keel-stepped mast being stronger is that with a keel stepped the mast is not supposed loads are put loads into the deck.

In reality, this ideal is rarely accomplished for a number of reasons. First of all, if the mast is not tied to the deck or the deck tied to the keel near the mast, either with a tie rod or a tie from the mast to the deck and a connection from the mast to the keel, the downward force of the mast working in opposition to the upward loads of the shrouds can pull the hull together like a bow and arrow lifting the deck and separating the joint between bulkheads and the deck. You sometimes see this type of separated bulkheads on inexpensive or early fiberglass boats with keel stepped masts.

Not only do keel stepped masts impart vertical loads into the deck (through the ties mentioned above) but they also typically end up imparting side loads as well (if they are going to reduce the moments in the mast as mentioned above). This somewhat reduces the structural advantages of a keel-stepped mast to next to zero assuming that a deck-stepped mast is properly engineered, and that is a big if!

There are several things that I consider critical to engineering a deck stepped mast properly. Primary is having a jack post below the mast. A jack post is a vertical member that carries the vertical loads of the mast to the keel. My preference is to have an aluminum jack post rather than a wooden one but a wooden post can work as well. The other issue is the distribution of the side loads. Ideally there should be a bulkhead or ring frame adjacent to the mast that can take the side loads and distribute them into the hull. These are obviously more complex to do than simply having a fat spot on the keel for the mast step to land on.

My objections are to the purely practical. Keel stepped masts mean that there is always water in the bilge. This water comes in at halyard boxes and other openings in the mast and nothing you can do will stop that. Second, it is way harder to step and unstep a keel stepped mast making the boat more subject to damage in the process. Beyond that if you loose a mast (I have lost two in my life) it is better in my opinion to loose a deck stepped mast because a keel-stepped mast is more likely to damage the deck when it fails and a deck-stepped mast is easier to clear away. The keel stepped mast advoactes point out that you are more likely to end up with a bigger stump after the mast fails. I am not sure that that is the case.

My preferred set up is a deck stepped mast that has a welded flange on its bottom that is through bolted through the deck into the top flange of a structural jack post. The boat that I am buying has a keel stepped mast. It is my intent to pull this mast and have it modified to that arrangement.

11-06-2001 07:12 PM
Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts

My boat is keel stepped but the mast butt does not contact water and after 34 years is still fine - this is a serious problem it seems with many boats. If the rigging fails, most masts when they start to bend - thats it they just keep on going. Most emergency procedures are to cut rigging and lash parallel to boat. I, if given the choice prefer the keel step as the drive is right from the bottom of the boat and in a cruiser thats a beautiful thing. Whatever your choice hope you enjoy the boat - the most important thing Good luck Chris
10-26-2001 02:02 PM
Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts

our cheoy lee 44 - perry has a deck stepped mast with a compression colum passing the load to the keel. I believe that if we were to be dismasted the sucker would do less damage outside the boat than it would inside the boat. And of course carry something to cut away the shrouds - quickly.
10-25-2001 08:02 AM
Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts

Our boat (1985)has a keel stepped mast that is wet if there is a quart of water in the bilge.
We bought it last year and I had to trim 1/8 inch from the bottom to square it off. I also cleaned up the corrosion and sealed with 2 part epoxy paint.
When the mast was stepped last spring, the paint at the base was scratched...resulting in some additional corrosion this season, although nothing like before. Looks like we will be pulling the mast at a minimum of every other year.
If you decide to go with a keel stepped mast, try to get one that is spaced up a bit and easier to keep dry.
10-22-2001 08:28 AM
Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts

Opinions are like sphincters . . . anyway, forestay lets go on keel stepped, it might remain standing. If it kicks out of the keel shoe, you have over 6'' of mast waving around belowdecks, possibly driving holes in the boat. Used to be a big concern for me, with a deck stepped mast. It seems like I ascertained the loss in strength/utility when comparing the deck stepped to keel stepped was quite marginal - only about 10%. This was loose-mounted simply on a shoe. Add a through-bolted tabernacle mechanically attached to your compression post (like the retrofit the guy that still maintains the Westsail website custom builds) and I''ll bet the differences are negligible.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome