SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Help solve a debate.. Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-07-2007 01:45 AM
sailaway21 I would advise you to look at Robert Ganier's post in the thread the Dog linked.

I, of course, spent great amounts of time this spring measuring and adjusting to equalize my spreader angles. I erected my mast, as only I can handle an erection, and the damn things were still basically horizontal-where they've apparently been since about 1973. I have them well seized to the shrouds, so am unconcerned about slippage. Furthermore, for all the Cartesian geometry displayed, I see no allusions to the fact that the spreader does not apply it's strain to the mast proportionately angle-wise. My casual observations show that most seem to be closer to horizontal than bisecting the shroud. Whether correct or not, this seems to be the case. In short, I suspect the actual angle is not critical (how accurate can you get it?) and while upwards to a degree is desirable, slippage is intolerable. JMHO, YMMV
08-07-2007 01:11 AM
sailingdog Groundhog-

The spreaders should bisect the angle formed by the shroud at the tip of the spreader. The angle between the shroud and the spreader above the spreader should equal the angle between the shroud and the spreader below the spreader. This will leave them angled upwards slightly.

If the spreader isn't bisecting the angle formed by the shroud, then the shroud can exert a downward torque on the spreader, which it really isn't designed to resist. If the spreader is forced downward, then it will eventually bend and fail... then the mast falls over. This is generally not good and quite expensive. See the following thread about this. LINK
08-07-2007 01:02 AM
Help solve a debate..

My buddy says spreaders should extend perpendicularly from the mast.

I think I have read that they should be slightly above the horizontal. And that the angle that is formed from the shroud wire and spreader should be equal above and below the spreader end.

Who's right? Or is no one right?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome