SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: narrowed list - need valued input Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
11-02-2002 07:26 AM
narrowed list - need valued input

Good morning.
I,myself,aren''t really sure about the exact construction of most of the Endeavour line but I do know many people do take their E''s out to sea and across oceans without failure all the time.
Is the build quality that of a Hallberg? I don''t know...Probably not.Is the build quality surperior to Catalina,Hunter,Jeneau,Pearson or Tartan?Mine is.
I own the thirty-two.The hull is thickly laid-up with a half inch at the sheer three quarter inch at the turn of the bildge and progressivly thicker as you go down to the ''garboard'' area.Never a blister...ever.
My rudder is just as tight as the day she was built.She washed up on shore during hurricane Bob back in ''92 and the only dammage was to gelcoat.No delamination. Still to this day.
The interior has a four piece liner with each section glassed in sepretly and stops at the bridge deck bulkhead.The engine beds being glassed to the hull and not to a liner.The liner stops at the setee backs and the rest of the interior is built with a generious amoumt of teak and very pleasant if I might add.Teak and holly sole.
Bulkheads are fully glassed to the hull before liner install.
Storage is generous.
Stress cracks on deck are minimal...not even an issue.
My hull to deck joint has never leaked...not one drop and the 5200 used for bedding is still soft and strechy.
There''s more to say, but thats enough.
A high quality boat? Mabey not. I''m not an expert.
A low quality boat? Not even close.
Hope this helps,

11-01-2002 04:51 PM
narrowed list - need valued input

Not "low" quality, but lower relative to Hallberg Rassy, Tartan, and Oyster. that is just my opinion fromlooking at boats and speaking with people. My sense is that they are not as well built re: deck-to-hull joint, hardware sizing, interior joinery. They were not built to as high standards.

I would not be as comfortable in the middle of the Atlantic in Force 8 in an Endeavor as in a Hallberg-Rassy, which is built to cross oceans. Heavy, highly-reinforced hull, extra-well-tabbed bulkheads, beefy hardware. Endeavors were not built for the same usage. it does not make them bad boats, just built for a different audience.

Just my 2 cents. I may be off base.
11-01-2002 03:46 PM
narrowed list - need valued input


Your thoughts pretty much mirror mine (except I felt the Endeavour was on the same construction level as the Pearson & Moody).

Are you familiar with the sailing characteristics of the HR, Bristol, or Oyster, ie: would they be well suited for the light air on the Chesapeake?
11-01-2002 03:32 PM
narrowed list - need valued input

Why do you say Endeavours are low quality?
I''m curious.

11-01-2002 02:48 PM
narrowed list - need valued input

My 2 cents:
Higher quality: HR, Bristol, Oyster
Medium: Pearson 424 (we were actully very impressed with the interior joinery on the 2 we looked at; we expected a lot of wood-grain laminates as in other Pearsons of that vintage...)
Lower quality: Endeavor (I would not go offshore in one.)

Have you looked also at Whitby 42 (later models are better made), Peterson 44, Bewer 12.8? All these are lovely center cockpit boats with good reputations. We had similar needs but a lower budget and ended up with a Mariner 39 (built in New Hampshire, not the far east or CA...) which is similar to the above boats but a tad smaller. I don''t think there are any on the market right now, although she meets all of your criteria, except cutter rig.

Whitby 42s have some tenderness/helm issues that many POs have addressed with added lead to the Brewer cutaway keel and enlarged rudder. There are active owner groups that can probably tell you a lot about sailing characteristics of at least the P424, HRs, Whitby42s... probably others as well. Look at Sailnets email groups or do a Google search. It''s also interesting to make a chart and compare capsize ratios, sail area/dispacement ratios, etc, for the boats you are considering.... a good web site for that is

have fun''s so much fun!!
11-01-2002 07:48 AM
narrowed list - need valued input

After a year of careful consideration and boarding countless boats we have determined that a center cockpit gives us the live-aboard features we are looking for. We have narrowed our list to:Moody42, HR42&41, Pearson422, Endeavour42&40, Vagabond Westwind, **Bristol 41, Oyster40.

We have set the following criteriaraft under 6'' (prefer closer to 5''), solid FG hull, prefer cutter rig, 150water & 75fuel capacity.

Our price range is $150k+- and we will be sailing the Chesapeake, Pamlico, IC & Bahamas.

I would appreciate your input as relates to the sailing qualities (or lack of) and the construction quality of these boats.


Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome