SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Iron Keels Versus Lead Keels Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
11-30-2007 10:55 AM
twofish81 Thank you for all the valuable informations. How can I end this post and stick to one as Im very new to this forum. Sorrry for posting twice for the same topic.
11-30-2007 10:27 AM
sailingdog Any reason you posted this exact same topic twice????
11-30-2007 09:59 AM
Faster You should do a forum search, this topic has been discussed extensively before.

Another disadvantage of an iron keel is its reluctance to absorb impact. Lead is soft enough to give to a collision with a rock or whatever, often becoming misshapen... but that absorbs quite a bit of energy which means less potential damage to stringers, tabbing etc in the area behind the keel. The Iron keel has no give and transfers all that energy quite (too) efficiently.

However job one is to avoid such obstacles, and living with an iron keel is not so bad in these days of effective epoxies for encapsulation, which greatly minimizes the maintenance issues.

Also you should avoid posting the same question in two forums.....
11-30-2007 09:12 AM
JohnRPollard Clarence,

You pretty much covered it. The reason iron is used is that it is less expensive, which to the best of my knowledge is the ONLY advantage to iron. But it's a false economy in my book. Iron can be a costly nuisance/headache to maintain in the long run. Also, for an external ballast/bolt on keel, the iron keel will require more volume (thickness) than a comparable weight lead keel, so there will likely be diminished performance at the same draft and/or the designer will have to resort to keel appendages like wings, etc.

I think, however, that you are mistaken about the move away from lead. Most quality builders continue to use lead for ballast and would not even consider using iron.
11-30-2007 08:46 AM
Iron Keels Versus Lead Keels

Dear all,

Can anyone please advice what are the pro and cons for both Iron Keels and Lead Keels? Besides the highmaintainance cost of iron keels, what are the advantages for iron keels?

As I know iron price is 6 to 8 times lower then lead, and regarding about the environment issue now a days, most of the people is moving away from lead keels to iron keels.

I'd really appreciate the advice from you guys that have so much experience.

thank you

Clarence Leong

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome