SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: strange design question Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-30-2003 05:37 PM
strange design question

Ahoy, stop smoking weed its bad fer yer brains, you''d do better trying to sail two buick regals!! AARRGGHH Pirate of Pine Island
03-30-2003 07:36 AM
strange design question

I am not sure whether it is or not. John Holmes was or is an amazing man. His was one of these people who have interests in wide ranges of human knowledge and although soft-spoken seemed to be able to talk to almost any topic that came by him. He did design a number of really neat boats over the years. Until very recenmtly, I had always thought that Helms was a Florida boat builder and in the early 1970''s I thought I had met Helms and had toured his facilities in St. Pete or Clearwater, Florida while batting about looking at boatyards and boat builders. I was recently corrected that Helms was apparently not located in Florida, so I am not sure who I had met and spoken with. Still, it would not surprise me to find out that Holmes had designed boats for Helms or that Helms had started in Florida, but it would be pure speculation for me to say otherwise.

03-30-2003 06:40 AM
strange design question

Jeff: Thank you very much for your answer. I always appreciate your insight and thoughtful presentation of your opinions. BTW, is that the same John Holmes that designed boats for Jack Helms? I own Helms 30 that was designed by a John Holmes. Its a great boat. I am getting ready to move it from Texas to Florida in the next couple months. Thanks again.

03-30-2003 05:21 AM
strange design question

I must say, that you have gone long past ''strange'' on the ''Wierdometer'' with this question. 8^) BUT I will try to answer it for you.

I guess to start with, catamarans get their speed advantage not from being able to plane (most cats really cannot plane in the traditional sense) but from having very low drag, both in terms of wave making and in terms if wetted surface. This low drag comes from a couple sources.

First of all this low drag comes from light weight. In theory, a catamaran is all about form stability rather than ballasted stability. It is the rapid shifting to leeward of the center of buoyancy relative to the center of gravity that gives a cat its stability. Since cats require minimal ballast, they can have smaller hull volumes in the water and so less surface area to create drag.

The other part of this is that the two hulls each carrying a little more than half of the displacement at any given time can be very slender. (Roughly twice as slender as similar displacement monohull) We now know that properly shaped these very slender hull forms produce very small bow and stern waves. In the absense of large bow and stern waves, the hullspeed can creep up from the traditional 1.34 times the sq rt of the waterline length, well up into 2 times (and in the case of big racing cats to 3.5 times) the sq rt of the waterline length without planing.

Now then, when you talk about bolting two Catalina 27''s together, (ignoring that the structure of a Catalina 27 is not robust enough to take the high loadings that occur at the connections between the hulls) you are adding the weight and drag of each hull to the system so that you would end up with a 27 footer with twice the weight and drag of a normal 27 footer. If you think of this as a 17,000 lb catamaran, you would expect that as a 17,000 catamaran the waterline length would normally be 35 to 50 feet. So you have all of the surface area and all of the wave making drag on a very short, wide waterline. You will have more than double the drag of a normal Catalina 27 because of the added weight and drag of the connecting structure and wake interaction of the two hulls.

A 27 foot performance catamaran would weigh in at around 1500 lbs and a 27 foot reasonable performance 27 foot cruising cat might only weigh 3000 lbs.

Then we get to the rig. Except in a very narrow range of wind angles, there would be tremendouse interation between the two rigs. In other words one or both sailplans will have dramatically reduced efficiency due to the proximaty of the other rig. This reduced efficiency sail plan will be trying to overcome higher drag. There might be a slight offset caused by the fact that this boat won''t heel much and so in a horizontal wind condition (actually in practice pretty rare)there will be slightly more wind felt by the sail when reaching. The reality is that you would probably need to add a single sparred sailplan that is more closely commensorate with a 17,000 lb monohull to even achieve the speeds of a Catalina 27

So cutting to the chase, what kind of sailing ability would this monstrosity have? It would be slow as compared to a single Catalina and not terribly manueverable. It would have a very weird motion and would be a bear to engineer. Now if you took to Catalina 27''s, tool off the ballast keels and made smaller rudders.......nah,never mind.

Tell your friend that for less money than he can buy a well maintained Catalina 27 he can probably buy a 27 foot Stilletto and have all of the advantages of a purpose designed 27 foot Cat.

(BTW the fighter plane looking canopy design on the Stilletto 27 was my idea. I came across the guy who started Stilletto when he was working on the design. He was John Holmes Boatyard down in Florida building a hull model and I happened in. He had previously been a Hobie Cat distributer and I had met him years before when I worked for a company commissioning and repairing Hobies. We got into a discussion about the Stilletto and he mentioned that was trying to come up with a jazzy idea for the companionway. John Holmes, the boat yard owner, was building a stunt plane and the yard was filled with abandoned plexiglass canopies which were the result of his failed experiments with building his own canopy. I joked that Stilletto could pick these up a couple of these pretty cheaply and it would make a pretty dramatic companionway hatch. I was joking but the idea stuck. we kicked around posible slide mechanisms but none that made much sense. But that is how Stillettos came to have thier distinctive fighter plane canopy looking companionway hatches.)


03-29-2003 04:48 PM
strange design question

I am asking this question for my good friend Mark A.
Hypothethically, what kind of sailing vessel would you wind up with if you joined two monohulls together to form a catamarran? Lets assume that two catalina 27''s were used, the masts were left in place, and an 8'' wide deck was built between the two hulls. The steering would be linked together. Assuming the physical joining of the two hulls was bulletproof, what kind of sailing ability would this monstrosity have? Thanks for your input.


Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome