SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Fishfinder or depth sounder Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below


  Topic Review (Newest First)
2 Weeks Ago 02:03 PM
Minnesail
Re: Fishfinder or depth sounder

Quote:
Originally Posted by ddiesel View Post
it sounds like the fish finder is a better choice than the depth sounder. Does any one make one that can be permanently mounted on the cockpit bulkhead and is weather proof?
This thread is eight years old, so electronics have improved and gotten cheaper since then.

For my small boat I have a Lowrance Hook 4 that came with the Navionics+ chip. It's a fish finder that also shows depth, speed, bottom composition, and works as a chart plotter. It has all the US charts including inland lakes. The display is weatherproof and can be mounted in the cockpit. It was under $400.

The limitation are that the screen is small (about the size of an iPhone) and it has older networking technology (NMEA 0183) so you might have trouble hooking it up with all the other latest and greatest.
2 Weeks Ago 11:39 AM
zeehag
Re: Fishfinder or depth sounder

i had an apelco by raymarine until the screen got a sunburn. i need to err wish to replace it with another-- i prefer both gps depth sounder and a fishfinder , each mounted in different places on hull to allow depth info for med type mooring. gps ahead of my keel, fishfinder is under cockpit--ha ha ha helluva practical place for depth--ye can see how deep it wasnot as you wrestle of the shoal..hahahahaha
my gps depth sounder is both or either thru hull or stick to inside of hull mount and the fishfinder has a thru hull fitting already and a transducer, so i seek specific fishfinder compatible with my trandsucer.
3 Weeks Ago 09:29 AM
ddiesel
Re: Fishfinder or depth sounder

it sounds like the fish finder is a better choice than the depth sounder. Does any one make one that can be permanently mounted on the cockpit bulkhead and is weather proof?
05-24-2009 04:41 AM
noelex77
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
The only problem with getting one of the Garmin/Lowrance/Hummingbird combination GPS chartplotter/fish finders is that the wind instruments won't be able to talk to them, and can't estimate true wind speed then. If you don't use electronic wind instruments... you're home free.
The Raymarine ST60 wind instruments wont display true wind from a gps derived SOG. For expensive up market wind instrument they should be able to do this. Other wind instruments will.
05-23-2009 07:09 PM
Cemseller
New Question, Same Line

I have an In Hull Transducer, old but still there. Has anyone rewired one of these to a new fishfinder was planning on buying one but didn't know if it would work.

Thanks
03-16-2008 09:35 PM
T34C Polysulfite caulk works very well to attach the puck style transducers for shoot thru hull aplications. It will set-up fairly solidly and doesn't flex like silicone and screw up the reading.

While it is true that these combo units cannot "talk" to your wind instruments, I'm not sure what they would have to say even if they could. The best case senario would be that you could have one display that could toggle thru multiple instruments, but I'm not convinced I would want that anyway. I like the idea of having all the data on screen right in front of me.
03-16-2008 05:12 PM
Valiente
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryL View Post
Hello,

If your boat has a solid fiberglass hull, installing the transducer should take about 1 minute. You can use a 'puck' type transducer instead of a through hull. You don't need to epoxy the transducer or mount it in a tube filled with oil. All you need is some toilet bowl wax (about $1.00 from Home Depot, etc.). Press a wad of wax onto the hull where you want to place the transducer, then press the transducer into the wax.

I did this about a year ago. I originally planned on using the wax to find a good location, and then epoxying it in. However, since it has worked great, I have no reason to glue it down.

Good luck,
Barry
I used a smear of 4200 in front of the keel root, aimed about 8-10 degrees forward. That gives me the view directly beneath my bow, and the depth is "my keel plus six inches for waterline variables"!
03-16-2008 12:49 PM
sailboy21 Some of the companies state in their product description that the in hull transducers work as good if not better than the thu-hull types. Toilet bowl wax sounds good. I had similar results with "shoe goo." Sometimes you have to play around with location due to trapped air in the laminate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryL View Post
Hello,

If your boat has a solid fiberglass hull, installing the transducer should take about 1 minute. You can use a 'puck' type transducer instead of a through hull. You don't need to epoxy the transducer or mount it in a tube filled with oil. All you need is some toilet bowl wax (about $1.00 from Home Depot, etc.). Press a wad of wax onto the hull where you want to place the transducer, then press the transducer into the wax.

I did this about a year ago. I originally planned on using the wax to find a good location, and then epoxying it in. However, since it has worked great, I have no reason to glue it down.

Good luck,
Barry
03-16-2008 12:47 PM
Quickstep192
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
The only problem with getting one of the Garmin/Lowrance/Hummingbird combination GPS chartplotter/fish finders is that the wind instruments won't be able to talk to them, and can't estimate true wind speed then. If you don't use electronic wind instruments... you're home free.

I prefer the Garmin units, since some of their models have all of the US coastal water charts pre-loaded and they seem to have the best user interface and software of the different brands.
This is a good point. Why can't Raymarine provide functionality on their chartplotters that would let them display a wind instrument? Seem like it would be easy to do.
03-16-2008 12:10 PM
BarryL
mounting transducers

Hello,

If your boat has a solid fiberglass hull, installing the transducer should take about 1 minute. You can use a 'puck' type transducer instead of a through hull. You don't need to epoxy the transducer or mount it in a tube filled with oil. All you need is some toilet bowl wax (about $1.00 from Home Depot, etc.). Press a wad of wax onto the hull where you want to place the transducer, then press the transducer into the wax.

I did this about a year ago. I originally planned on using the wax to find a good location, and then epoxying it in. However, since it has worked great, I have no reason to glue it down.

Good luck,
Barry
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome