|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|09-08-2008 07:30 PM|
Battenless Main sail Reasons
I recently prepared my Columbia 9.6 for a trip to Hawaii from the Puget Sound. As part of that preparation I decided to build (or have built) an 'offshore' suite of sails. That, of course, required significant research before I put Doyle to work making them. Doyle and I came up with a negative roached, battenless and no headboard main with a shortened leach as the preferred offshore sail for my particular vessel. Reasons:
1. No headboard = no headboard to get caught in shroud lines while trying to raise, strike or reef the sail off the wind.
2. No battens = simpler, also nothing to get caught in shroud lines.
3. Negative roach = reduced leach flutter compared to similar battenless main without negative roach.
4. Shortened (by 13") leach was my idea. I stand 6 feet, 2 inches in the cockpit. Even though I use a preventer, getting hit in the head by the boom during an accidental gybe was a safety concern. Shortening the leach ensured the boom clears my skull by several happy inches.
Here's what on-the-water testing revealed since:
1. It still ain't easy to hoist or strike the main off the wind. But it can be done and it doesn't get caught in the shroud lines.
2. There is some leach flutter. I expected this, but judicious use of the leach line pretty much eliminates it.
3. Reduced weather helm, especially when close hauled and approaching hull speed. The boat just plain balances better, to the point where I can keep the main driving well past the point where I normally would expect to be forced to 'feather' the more traditional, battened main that I normally use for Puget Sound cruising and club racing.
4. Flaking / tieing down the main onto the boom is simpler w/out having to worry about aligning the battens parallel to the boom.
5. Power loss? I didn't buy the battenless main so that I could ghost along in light air. I bought it for offshore, trade wind sailing. In similar conditions here in the Puget Sound I simply don't notice any difference in boat speed when the wind gets above 10 knots. Additionally, the helm is better balanced and the boat more comfortable. I'm sure that there would be a boat speed difference if I could do an on-the-spot simultaneous comparison, but I'm satisfied that the difference would be small. Heck, there's probably a point where not having to drag the rudder through the water sideways to counter weather helm makes the battenless main drive the boat faster.
6. A well-balanced helm makes my servo-pendulum self-steering system breathe easier too.
So, would I recommend a battenless main for offshore use? Generally yes, but I also will be quick to say it depends on both the boat and the crew. For an interesting discussion of such sails on ketches, check out main-sail
|04-28-2008 10:19 PM|
|SimonV||Ah... where you there, was it yor kid making all the noise. Not everything but quite a bit made you think.|
|04-28-2008 04:02 AM|
Originally Posted by SimonV View Post
|04-21-2008 09:05 AM|
I believe that this may be a boat that I worked on while I was working with Charlie in the early 1980's. If so she was designed to have a mainsail with roach and battens. These boats were intentionally slightly under canvased because they were also slightly under-ballasted for their drag and need every inch of sail area that these boats can have.
Now to correct the misinformation above. Talk to almost any knowledgeable sailmaker, if you care even slightly about sail shape, going battenless with a hollow leech greatly shortens the life of a mainsail since it requires much higher leech loadings to avoid leech flutter, in fact the shortest of all sail batten options. Without battens in high winds you need to carry a very tight leech line to minimize leech flutter, and that tight leech induces more weather helm than the sail area in a properly shaped roach with long battens. Going to heavier sail cloth simply aggrevates the light air problems with battenless mainsails but does little for the bias loading with battenless mainsails.
A mainsail with full length battens has the longest lifespan of all of the three choices, followed by mainsails with full length head battens and extended but not full length lowers. As SD notes it is important to have sacrificial chafe patches where the battens hit the shrouds. (Mine lasts approximately 2,000 sailing hours and are quick and easy to replace using dacron stickiback.)
|04-21-2008 02:51 AM|
|SimonV||I can only answer the question in relation to the batten less main. (Fresh from the boat show) For a cruising vessel not having battens has a number of advantages. e.g. There is less wear on the sail and it should last three times longer than a battened sail, it can be reefed without having to head up wind, in fact it can be reefed while still powered up, it can be let out further when running. A good sail maker can make a proper main without battens work perfectly well, if they say they can’t, find a proper sail maker. There were other reasons but a kid at the back of the seminar would not shut up.|
|04-21-2008 01:19 AM|
|04-20-2008 09:00 PM|
Originally Posted by sailingdog View Post
Adding roach will only make it worse because there is nothing to support the leech. Heck, I've even see people battened jibs!
By not having the stiffness aft that the battens provide, maximum draft will be a lot further aft than normal and this could induce weather helm.
|04-20-2008 04:47 PM|
One problem with full-batten mainsails is that batten pockets are often major sources of wear and tear on the sails.
They are also heavier than non-battened sails...since the battens add weight to the sail...and so does the additional roach area.
They are often harder to raise or lower due to the pressure that the battens put against the sailtrack on the mast, and many people resort to expensive battcar systems to deal with that issue.
They're more expensive to buy, since they require additional work and materials.
That said... they can often give better performance than un-battened sails. They tend to flog less and are often easier to reef and flake, since the battens tend to keep the sail aligned. They allow you to carry more sail area than you could with out them.
|04-20-2008 04:28 PM|
Faster makes a good point about mast rake. Too much rake could induce excessive weather helm. That's something worth checking. But there are a lot of other factors that come into play in the overall design -- it might be worth researching to see if this particular design has a reputation for exessive weather helm. Just tossing out possibilities -- it may have nothing to do with the sails or rig, it could be e.g. that the rudder is not adequately sized.
I have seen mainsails on cruising boats where the (short-handed) owners went to a negative roach and eliminated battens. The idea as explained to me was to deliberately depower the main a bit, to thereby postpone the point when a reef bacame necessary, and to eliminate a source of chafe on the sails for long-distance voyaging. But with the advent of full-batten mainsails systems even for cruising boats, I haven't seen that done much anymore.
Hopefully JeffH or some of the other knowledgeable designers here can offer additional insight.
|04-20-2008 03:27 PM|
You should look into mast rake as a way to try to alleviate the helm if indeed it's a problem.. a little is a good thing on most boats, but not, I suppose, if you expect it to steer itself on its own.
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|