SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Texas A&M University sailing team missing Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-25-2008 10:33 PM
messenger USCG report. Somewhat vague.. Missing, IMHO, where were the groundings? And those blackouts on page 9, I dont guess that anything to do with a bottle of ahhhh.....mouthwash...
12-20-2008 07:14 PM
Originally Posted by messenger View Post
http://"The Coast Guard also determined the emergency beacon formally known as the Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon and life raft were improperly stowed below deck before the boat capsized."

Life Raft and EPIRB stowed below!!!!!!!

Yes they did report that but neither had anything to do with the death as near as I can determine. It is further quite unclear to me from the report that there was anything wrong with where they were. The requirement for the raft is that it be deployable from down below within 15 seconds. The boat time to deploy. The EPIRP may have been a mechanically activated one rather than water activated. I am unaware of any requirement to stow an EPIRB on deck.

I am interested in actually seeing the real report rather than the press release as these two items seem to imply/ indicate some negligence on the part of the skipper or crew where none may exist.
We cruised for 4 years with the raft in a bag and a manually activated EPIRB stowed below...but easily accessed...and I never thought twice about it or ever read anything that said that was not perfectly acceptable practice.
12-20-2008 06:00 PM
messenger http://

"The Coast Guard also determined the emergency beacon — formally known as the Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon — and life raft were improperly stowed below deck before the boat capsized."

Life Raft and EPIRB stowed below!!!!!!!

07-10-2008 01:21 PM
Originally Posted by messenger View Post
There's a dedicated thread to the structural issues of the matter over in Design & Construction Forum.
07-10-2008 11:43 AM
messenger Lawsuit

1 month, 4 days

07-06-2008 12:26 PM
Boasun The retaining nuts are still in place. Leading to my conclusion that the keel tore out of the bottom of the boat. Which is very catastrophic for the vessel and the people on board.

I never really did liked those cantilever type of keels for the obvious reasons.
07-06-2008 12:02 PM
messenger Pretty good pic of the retreived keel
06-22-2008 07:30 AM
messenger The Galveston County Daily News

Ok, they found the keel. Now maybe some info on the raft, the MOB pole, "the horseshoe" which appeared to be bungee corded to the boat in a pic taken the day the race started, and who did the last survey? Seven groundings?
06-16-2008 11:14 AM
ausgator Maybe I just missed it, but why no mention of a life raft? An offshore event like this would certainly have required a life raft, wouldn't it? Did it get trapped because the boat turtled so quickly, did it malfunction, or did it just get blown away?
06-13-2008 03:41 PM
sailingdog Very true, most of the powerboats at my marina, especially the 40'+ ones are surprised when I come in from a day of sailing in SCA conditions, with Force 6/7 winds and seas.

Originally Posted by JohnRPollard View Post
As for the 87-foot WPBs, they are designed to operate in coastal conditions, up to only Force 5. That would be in the low-20 knot wind-speed range, and seas up to 6 feet or so.

Many folks would be surprised to learn that most blue-water capable sailboats can continue to sail safely in conditions that exceed the operational range of even some Medium Endurance Cutters.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome