|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|05-27-2011 01:46 PM|
Originally Posted by norsearayder View Post
Some of the anchorages in Fl are used mainly by folks traveling up the ICW. The towns along the water way may have been doing us what they thought was a good turn by limiting the stay. How would you feel if your favorite hidey hole that was always so peacefull but you could only stay 24hs, was suddenly full of boats that stay there all winter? This is just another view point. I do agree that the 24 hr law was illegal, but it may have been to our advantage.
|05-27-2011 11:31 AM|
|norsearayder||some people.....i float around and anchor where i want and you know what i paid a lot of taxes this year.......the water is common ground owned by all.i am also old and ugly maybe they dont want to look at my face either....but on the other hand up in maine people dont have that problem..last summer i was anchored up in a small gut next to a small island town on one side and a private island[one house] on the other.the owner of the private island yelled out to me offering 2 mooring balls one in town and one near his island[out of the current ]|
|05-26-2011 11:25 PM|
Originally Posted by xort View Post
We ARE the view!
|06-27-2008 09:35 PM|
Did you read the original posting?
"Mr. Sibilla may not have much money, but he had a nice recreational boat which he anchored in the Okeechobee Waterway within the city limits"
This has never been about derelict boats. There are plenty of means to deal with derelict boats. This is about wanting to force cruisers into controlled environments where fees can be charged. Anchoring is FREE, how dare they! They're blocking MY view of the water, the nerve. I pay lots of taxes for that view and they aren't paying anything, the bums!
|06-27-2008 03:57 PM|
My friend here on the Little Magothy River watched the DNR come by and refloat a deserted boat that broke free of it's anchor and sank. Upon raising said boat from the water they dove in, checked for bodies or evidence of foul play, then let it sink back down where it was.
Seems clearing sunken boats is the owners responsibility, and since no one knew who the owner was there it sat. My friend called 7 on your side (local news) who then did the investigative report thing we all love so much.
Two phone calls and one day later the boat was refloated and towed off by DNR.
Squeaky wheels get oil.
If a boats been deserted DNR (or the local version in FL) can put a sticker on a boat with a 30 day call back warning. Then impound the boat for 60 days (charging fair rate per day if the owner wants to recover), after which they can auction the boat off for salvage.
They could even have the tow companies do the service for free.
Self funded clean water, what an idea
People that don't visit their floating ping pong balls for more than 30 days deserve to have them impounded.
Nasty, but it does not impose on our legal right to navigate as we see fit, not as some city council member who doesn't like his view of his waterfront spoiled sees the law.
|06-27-2008 01:49 PM|
"is the severe problem of derelict vessels we have in Florida"
agreed, but I've inquired about some of the same.
You would be amazed at the abject lack of knowledge of various departments who all claim to either "be in charge" of these vessels, or have even a modicum of a clue as to what paperwork is needed, required, supplied, wiped with pertaining to the salvage rights and or disposal of these vessels.
I have personally spent over 2 days straight waiting in various offices, (forget phone calls) being jacked from one official to another, only to be told that not only do they don't have a clue, they have no idea as to which 7-11 sells these clues.
I have taken the stance with some of the F&G folks, as well as the dept. of hemp undies fella's that upon my first encounter with a human with a pulse, my very first question is....
"you got a boss?" "I'll wait for 'em". and still, nada.
From city, to county, to state, to even the USCG (who reports said tubs to the state), who reports 'em to F&G, who reports 'em to state police, county police, local police and I think the local garden club, that nothing happens because nobody has a nickel in the game. I give up.
|06-27-2008 10:53 AM|
|bubb2||This is good new!|
|06-27-2008 10:46 AM|
If they are not anchored in a channel, then the analogy of parking in the emergency lane of I-95 falls apart. It would be more like them being parked in a rest area parking lot. Not the same thing at all. And, yes, I've seen vehicles parked in a rest area for more than a day. If they've got a good reason, the cops let them do it.
|06-27-2008 10:37 AM|
Once again we find tax payers subsidizing a lawyers income. It was probably a lawyer who wrote the code and another lawyer who used it to fill his pockets with cash.
The real issue here, that was probably the main reason the code was created to begin with, is the severe problem of derelict vessels we have in Florida. Someone tried to create a code that would address the problem and still protect the rights of everyone. Unfortunately everyone looses when you try to write compromise legislation (based on protecting your ability to get reelected by not offending some nitch of voters).
In my opinion any vessel anchored in these types of areas not expressly designated for long term anchorage for more than a couple of weeks should be considered derelict and be subject to impounding, retitling and sold to fund the clean up of derelict vessels through out the state. It has become a real navigation hazard and eye sore for everyone. We do not allow people to park their motor homes in the emergency lane on I-95 or even at the rest areas for any extended period. It's simple common sense, something that appears to be a lost trait in today's world.
|06-26-2008 11:20 PM|
|sailingdog||Very good post Free...|
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|