SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Fat ass transoms Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
12-29-2004 04:15 AM
Fat ass transoms

I think this comment was way over the top and want you to know that I really enjoyed it!
12-27-2004 10:23 PM
Fat ass transoms

My girlfriend has a fat ass transom and she has no problem blowing to weather at all
12-20-2004 02:41 AM
Fat ass transoms


I think you are pretty much correct, as always.

In discussing this very subject with a very well known Canadian Ship designer, he pointed out that my 53'' cutter with a flat buttocks aft, would have superior performance on all points of sail, particularly offwind.

Your concern with the bow was also discussed and he seems to agree with you and carefully attends to the bow design to prevent "digging in".
12-19-2004 12:35 PM
Fat ass transoms

Woosh and Jeff,
Thank you for your responses.
So... an aft section that is shaped like a cresent moon is more desirable for performance to weather than an aft section shaped like say, a wide ''U''?

12-19-2004 11:08 AM
Fat ass transoms

Not all broad transomed boats are designed alike. If properly designed, so that there was a minimal increase in drag and so that there was a minimal change in underbody shape when heeled and if sailed comparatively flat, then the additional width aft, combined with moving the longitudinal center of buoyancy aft can result in a finer bow and a more powerful stern section which in turn would result better windward performance.

But if designed so that the hull shape changed rapidly with heel angle, and a change in trim so that the bow was forced down, or was coupled with a full bow and a lot of flare, or was coupled with extreme beam throughout the length of the boat, then a broad transom could really hurt windward performance.

12-19-2004 08:03 AM
Fat ass transoms

A wide transom doesn''t necessarily dictate the underwater hull form but, as the boat heels, it''s probably a reasonable generalization to say that the waterplane of the hull becomes increasingly asymetrical. IOW the intersection of the hull with the water increases at a proportionally greater rate back aft than it does up forward. This is going to generate increasing weather just about the same time that your sail plan does so, as well.

12-19-2004 07:05 AM
Fat ass transoms

Do they hurt when going to weather??

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome