|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|02-26-2010 02:15 PM|
I'm a pretty good tinkerer, and have an electric drive. My suggestion when you need to scale back on the requirements to match 2010's physical realities is to drop the requirement for hull speed. That's where you'll get the biggest bang for the buck. My system uses about 1.2KW to push the boat at 3kn in a calm protected harbor. Hull speed can be reached, but at a cost of 7.2KW. If my math is correct, that is a six fold increase. To do that for just a few minutes makes me weep for the batteries.
Sidenote: story on NPR the other day saying there will be a manufacturing glut for Lithium Ion batteries in 2012! Maybe by then the charging algorithms and systems can be marinized and come down in price, too.
Yeah, I'm not holding my breath...
And if someone does design the system your looking for, let me know! I'll buy stock in that one!
|02-26-2010 01:56 PM|
The question that I have with the system that you outline is whether it meets the power output requirement. The batteries that you included have so little storage, it is essentially negligeable over 30 hours. That means that the generator needs to power the motor directly. The generator is rated at 2kw feeding a charger (~90% efficient), powering a motor controller (~95% efficient for a really good one) giving you power to the motor of 1.7kw to the motor best case scenario. This is 2.3hp which is very unlikely to push the OP's boat at hull speed. You might well get to 1/2 of hull speed in calm conditions but it doesn't meet the spec of maintaining hull speed. What you are proposing would most likely work if you went to a 4kw generator and the associated increase in charger size but this would significantly increase the cost and size of the system. Of the options posted, yours is the closest to meeting the specs but it still doesn't come close to meeting them in my book.
My issue with hybrids in boats is a separate issue. Their overall efficiency is lower because of all of the energy conversions and you really violate KISS. I have built 3 electric cars and 1 hybrid racecar and a hybrid is a real nightmare from the standpoint of what can go wrong. The reason that hybrids get better fuel economy in cars in the city is that they are parallel hybrids and the vehicle keeps accelerating and decelerating. In a boat, a parallel hybrid just doesn't make sense since we run constant rpm. The two applications are completely different (continuous versus intermittant).
|02-26-2010 01:23 PM|
Originally Posted by bljones View Post
The reason why the other posts on this subject are of "blue sky" quality is that with the technology available now, that's all it can be.
And like I said - a tinkerer is not likely to achieve something that the best engineering genius in the world with an almost unlimited budget can't.
Like some earlier posts alluded to - putting the kind of tech required into a 24 foot boat is a contradiction in terms - you'd have to use the electric boat to tow the one you're travelling in because there wouldn't be enough space for you in the electric boat. (see, there's the smilie)
|02-26-2010 01:12 PM|
|bljones||Omato, I am not looking to get out of rebuilding my diesel. My intention here was to see if there was a viable alternative, maybe prompt some backyard tinkerer/lurker here to come forward and say, "hey, here's what I did," start a dialogue a little more focused than the usual blue sky electric boat threads by presenting a specific problem, and an incentive to solve that problem.|
|02-26-2010 01:06 PM|
As with the 3 million fuel savers "invented" for automotive use over the years, I ask the question: If a motor manufacturer could save 40% on the fuel consumption (as claimed by most fuelsaver inventors) they would slaughter the car market - it would be worth billions of $. But even with their annual $200m R&D budget, they can't come up with a working solution. So how does the inventor in his suburban garage do it? Well, in truth he doesn't - they're all scams.
It's the same with your challenge. If a wealthy yacht-builder with a substantial R&D budget could provide silent endless propulsion they would also slaughter the market.
But have they?
Because it can't be done with the technology available today.
Like I said in another thread - get over it - fix your diesel.
|02-26-2010 01:04 PM|
BLJ, the direct DC output of the honda is indeed too small. That's the point of using the Xantrex charger and 3 x 12volt batteries is to use the full 120volt output of the genset and step it up to 36volts. If you don't like the outside EPOD approach there are some companies that use direct to your existing shaft type installs.
Another thought is that instead of using top shelf parts (like the honda and Xantrex) you could do the ghetto-DIY option as listed here:
Building your own generator.
You could still use a brand new honda OHV engine, a bomar high capacity alternator and a fancy regulator and you'd be doing everthing in DC voltage and come out cheaper than the original system I reccomended.
Another thought still is to use a DC power supply instead of the xantrex and the batteries.
|02-26-2010 12:47 PM|
Med, even running full time, the generator's output would not keep up with the power demands of the motor. The 12 volt output is only 8 amps., less than 25% of the motor's rating, and the power still has to be stepped up to 36 volts. A generator any larger would definitely not fit in the available space.
I also have some concern with the re-e-power approach of hanging the motor in a pod under the hull. Unfortunately, it maybe a tough fit with my hull, and would present some structural issues.
|02-26-2010 12:46 PM|
|tommays||The Honda on deck in any weather would last about 1 hour|
|02-26-2010 12:38 PM|
Originally Posted by klem View Post
I do think the model specified would push the boat at his stated hull speed. Unfortunately the website has taken down some of the specs while they upgrade but you can see some good videos on youtube of similarly sized boats going nice and fast. 60amps is the max sustained rating for those motors and the charger was sized accordingly.
As for the OPs question about not being able to power the boat for 15hrs you might be right. Honday says the genset runs for 15hrs on 1.1gal of gas but closer review shows that's 1/4 load. Full rated load is 4hrs (1//4gal per hr), so you might need to upgrade to a 3 or 5 gal tank to get your 15hrs. Still 1/4 gal per hour ain't bad....
SD thanks for the math correction. My intention was to say "<5,000" which was the target number in the original post. There is even enough money left over in the budget for connecting wires, sound insulation, a proper tank and $100left to paypal to me for Rum.
|02-25-2010 06:00 AM|
Umm... 2750 + 1150 + 300 + 250 is a bit more than $3000 last I checked. Weight wise, this is also going to be more than the 320 lbs. of the Yanmar. The three batteries are probably close to 210 lbs. and the generator is probably another 100 and you haven't even gotten to the Xantrex or the Epod motor or fuel tank.
Your math sucks...
[QUOTE=MedSailor;573709]Your answer is not a pure electric system, but rather a hybrid system. After all, you're willing to put up with running an engine while underway, so why not run a genset to power your electric motor.
Epod 2000 36Amp electric motor from re-e-power.com $2,750
Honda 2000i generator $1150
Xantrex 60C 60 amp charger $250
3x group 27 deep cycle batteries $300 (or less)
2.5gal gas can from gas station (with gas!) $10 Honda genset runs 15hr on 1.1gal of gas.
Total cost <$3000. Weight, is much MUCH less than your yanmar with tank and you get a high t
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|