SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Morgan Nelson Marek 36 Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-03-2010 06:00 PM
westcoastcat I ended up buying the MN Morgan 36 in Arizona, it does have running backs though they were not installed or apparently ever used by the p.o. The boat also has a provision for a babystay. My rigger out here raced on one of these years ago out of Marina Del Rey, that boat did not have running backs or a babystay. Boat is still in the boat yard having work done, hope to be in the water next week.

By the way this boat has an enclosed forward and enclosed aft cabin, and seemingly short cockpit.
07-30-2010 01:49 PM
Morgan Nelson Marek running backstays

In communicating with an owner of the 1983 "R" racer version of the Morgan Nelson Marek (larger cockpit, shorter cabin, simple interior) he questioned why a specific standard version (smaller cockpit, larger cabin, very elegant interior) did not. The particular boat has attachments on the transom for running back stays but did not have any included. In looking at other standard versions none seem to have running back that correct? Would having them be an advantage when racing or even necessary?

In looking at the the boat there seem to be three versions..."R", and two standard (one with closed fore and aft berth and one with closed forward but simply an open quarter berth aft). Are there any other versions? What is the PHRF for the standard model?

Any insight would be most welcome as I am considering purchasing one.
04-14-2010 01:04 PM
CliffRuckstuhl Sean,

I got an email from the broker yesterday telling he it was still for sale. Was just curious as to what was going on with it.

04-14-2010 11:54 AM
Shams Hi Cliff,
I couldn't reply to PM because I don't have enough posts here.

Not much going on. I put in an offer with a condition to either trade or sell my boat with the broker...Don't know what kind of response I'll get. She needs a lot of work ...which will cost time and money so my offer reflected this. Owner my not feel the same way as I do about the value of the boat in it's current state.
Still need a new survey and sea trial...have not seen the sails yet, run the engine or tested any sysyems.

03-17-2010 04:23 PM
CliffRuckstuhl I also did not want a project boat or not that much of a project. Bent stanchions is not a big deal even the floor is not that bad. From what I have seen in boats like this that sit is they quickly fade. Faster than one would think. Frozen water in the bilge left unattended for years is another thing. Looking forward to your findings. For me it was the insurance thing and that it has sat for a long time and this alone causes damage. Truth is it's a $40K boat and just depends where you spend the $40K.

03-17-2010 12:21 PM
Shams I did go to see the boat.
The stays are still below with a lot of tension on them. The rig is still up and the boat has been sitting un attended for a long time. The shrink wrap is blowing in the wind. The galley floor boards are soggy as water has gotten in and rot them. And the boat is mildewy, smells of diesel and some stanchions have been bent by the shrink wrap (before it tore away).
I have also noticed that all the other MNMs donít have the internal stays. The chain plates and bulkheads look fine so I donít know why they are there. The deck and hull look sound but I have not taken a moisture meter to it. I have asked the broker about some of the repairs completed on the boat but I have not received an answer. In looking at the 2006 survey some of the issues have been fixed while other problems have arisen. I am going to go back to see it again with a friend who knows boats better than I. I canít tell if she is a diamond in the rough or just rough!
I current own a Morgan 27 that is ready to go and a pleasure to sailÖand a bigger boat is attractive but not an endless project boat.
Iíll keep in touch
03-17-2010 08:21 AM
CliffRuckstuhl Ok now I understand, when I was looking at it I also found 2 other N/M 36's for sale one on Lake Michigan and one out in AZ. Neither of these boats had the stays below deck but one did have some big stainless brackets for more support (quessing) I had contacted N/M about this sending them the pictures of all three boats. They did not know why the stays were installed down below and this was not how the boat was set up when new. My Insurance agent is a friend and thought we might have to explore the stay issues allot more. Had I not mentioned it to him I am sure it would not have ever come up. I decided to just buy another J 29 instead. The N/M 36 looked like it had been set on the hard and then forgotten. I did not go look at it and if I could have gotten it for a good price might have been a good deal. Have you looked at it? I would be interested in your thoughts.

03-16-2010 09:31 AM
Nelson Marek 36

On site there was another thread where people had replyed to your questions about the jock straps on this boat. At the bottom you posted that your insurance company was unsure if they could insure the boat and you had decided to look for a J 29.
Sorry, when I posted the reply I did not realize that these were 2 diffrent sites until I went back to check.

03-16-2010 08:07 AM
CliffRuckstuhl How did you know about my insurance company on the NM 36 ? It is not posted?

03-15-2010 08:31 PM
Shams I have also taken a look at the morgan nelson marek 36. She is quite a mess above and below deck. Did you decide against making an offer on this boat? I took a look at a 4 year old survey which wasn't too bad but I can tell more has gone wrong since then. Why did your insurance company shy away from this boat?

Thanks for any insight you can provide!

This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome