SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Seamanship & Navigation Forum devoted to seamanship and navigation topics, including paper and electronic charting tools.

Thread: Reading Charts Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below


  Topic Review (Newest First)
06-12-2010 09:14 AM
sailingdog Boasun—

i don't think so, given the depths on the NOAA ENC charts I have for the same area. If those are meters or fathoms, then the depths of the ENC charts are off by a factor of 3 or 6... which I tend to doubt.

06-12-2010 09:11 AM
sailingdog I'd point out that using decimal feet to indicate depths is less than useful and more wishful thinking than anything else. Given all the variables involved in bottom sounding, water level, tides, and such, the idea that 1.2" of distance is actually measurable in any significant way is just ridiculous.
06-12-2010 08:59 AM
Boasun
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevemac00 View Post
I switched from NOAA ENC to Navionics and I'm confused on the little subscript depths. The software units are set to feet. It seems absurd they can be inches or fractional feet. I might think fractional fathoms but again, we're in feet as you can see around Sandy Cay in the Bahamas. So, what is going on?
Actually those charts are in METERS. Not fathoms & feet.
So if you are using charts that the depths are in Meters you will need to change your depthfinder to meters and know the draft of your vessel in meters.
Charts pending on the country are either in Metric or Fathoms/feet. And you need to be aware of which it is and think in those measurements.
06-12-2010 08:48 AM
stevemac00 Thanks dog. That's what it appeared to be but I had difficulty imagining that kind of resolution - especially in deeper water. You can see a 78.7 there.
06-12-2010 08:37 AM
sailingdog Those are in decimal feet IIRC. The subscript is how many tenths of a foot deep it is...
06-12-2010 07:59 AM
stevemac00
Reading Charts

I switched from NOAA ENC to Navionics and I'm confused on the little subscript depths. The software units are set to feet. It seems absurd they can be inches or fractional feet. I might think fractional fathoms but again, we're in feet as you can see around Sandy Cay in the Bahamas. So, what is going on?

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome