SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: To Jeff H Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below

  Topic Review (Newest First)
08-08-2001 09:06 AM
To Jeff H

As a rough approximation, you can measure from the bootstripe (water line stripe) to the bottom of the keel in the folded up position. This is only a rough approximation of the board up depth. To refine this you can use a carpenter''s level and take measurements to both sides and down to the lowest edge of the keel with the swing keel in the up position. Then with the boat in the water you can take a rough measurement of the position of boot stripe relative to the actual waterline to refine things further.(Of course, you need to be standing on something other than the boat when you try to sight the actual waterline.)Also don''t forget to check if your rudder hangs below the depth of the Centerboard.

To figure the board down depth is a bit harder. Most times there is a little mark or discoloration on the top of the keel, where the swing keel where the keel abrades at the where the top of the drop keel aligns with the hull in the full down position. If you don''t have one then you can dive under the boat with a pencil and make a mark alng the bottom of the hull on the top of the keel with the keel down. With the boat out of the water you can then measure down to the bottom of the hull from the waterline and measure perpendicular to the pencil or abrasion line on the keel to the lowest point of the keel and add the two together to find yoru approximate draft.

08-08-2001 07:36 AM
To Jeff H

I like Jeff''s take on cruising boats and find myself agreeing on virtually all points of what makes a good sailing boat: deep external lead fin keel, moderate displacement, good windward ability. I''m just a "weekend warrior" coastal cruiser right now, but have dreams of endless days in warmer waters.

My current boat, a Sabre 28, has wonderful sailing characteristics but is too small and is not equipped for my future aspirations. I''m thinking I''d like a larger version of this boat for extended coastal cruising and occaisional crossings, but I seldom hear Sabres mentioned in the context of offshore passages. They certainly seem capable.

Anyone care to weigh in on the subject of passagemaking in an older Sabre 34, 36, or 38?
08-08-2001 04:16 AM
To Jeff H

thanks for the advice jeff!! we did buy a shallow draft sailboat for the reason of shallow water (lakes and spring fed rivers abound where we live) so i know we will get many hours of family fun. how can you figure out how much your boat draws? the seller estimated it to be about 18 inches--i have my doubts because it is a heavy boat. i cannot find a website for Helson 22''s and he misplaced his owner''s manual (after all these years)thanks!
08-07-2001 06:22 PM
To Jeff H

Swings keels are a good compromise for shoal draft and trailer sailing. In the full down they are pretty efficient and a lead swing keel should provide reasonable stability. I have never heard of one being done in lead. Most that I know of are cast iron. (You might check yours with a magnet.)

There are some negatives. I don''t recommend them in really rough conditions. I have been out in the Atlantic at the mouth of the Wilmington River in a small Venture with a swing keel, when we were hit by some particularly big waves and rolled onto beams ends far enough that the swing keel slammed shut. It did damage to the boat and certainly didn''t do our nerves any good. Some boats the swing keel can be locked down but this is not always the case. Depending on the design of the pivot they can bang around quite a bit in sloppy conditions and when on the hook. On boats with cast iron swing keels the keel needs to be maintained to prevent rust. Inspecting the pivot area of the swing keel for deterioration should be routine maintenance; as should replacing the lifting cable.

Used properly swing keel boats offer a lot of options for explosing shallow corners of the world that their fixed keel bretheren can''t get to, but like so many aspects of sailing, this comes with some compromises.

Congratulations on your new boat.
Fair winds and great sailing,
08-07-2001 12:02 PM
To Jeff H

jeff--i have been lurking in the boards for a while and i have always read your posts because they are full of excellent information. we just purchased our first sailboat (we are SO proud and happy) and it is a Helson 22 (75) in great garage kept condition. (paid only 2300.00 for it with a 6hp motor) new electric,sails etc. etc. lots of extra''s. my question is have you ever heard anything bad about a lead swing keel? that is the only thing on the entire boat that i am worried about.
07-20-2001 07:18 PM
To Jeff H

I am flattered by your addressing your question to me personally but I am not sure that I am the right guy for this. By preference I am pretty much a coastal cruiser. While I have spent time offshore, it''s just not my preference. I have never had any desire to do a circumnavigation but hope someday to cruise at leisure the Mediterranean, Caribbean and the Baltic as well as the U.S East Coast. I also have a very strong bias toward performance over interior comfort and comfort underway vs. comfort at the dock or anchor. This pushes me toward a point of view that is anything but mainstream when it comes to offshore boats.

There really is no such thing as "the ultimate offshore sailing boat." Each boat has their own compromises and biases and each owner has their own set of priorities, and prejudices. There might be one ultimate offshore sailing boat for each individual and there may also be one boat that appeals to any individual sailor as there one and only ultimate offshore sailing boat. Whether it really is or not is another story.

All of that said, I am actually in the process of buying a boat that I think of a good long distance cruiser (as well as coastal cruiser) so I will refer to my own process from time to time here as well.

In making the basic decisions about what size and kind of boat to buy as a long distance cruiser I had ruled out multihulls because I cannot afford to purchase on of a size capable of going any real distance and in the light air of a Chesapeake summer monohulls are actually faster.

So starting with displacement, if you look at traditional cruising oriented books and articles, there seems to be a general recommendation that a distance cruiser should weigh approximately 3 to 5 tons displacement per person. (Traditionally 6 tons was seen as being a practical maximum over which you would really wear out a crew.) So in theory a boat for a couple in classic literature should weigh in at 12,240 lbs. to 20,400 lbs. with 24,450 as a practical maximum.

Some things have changed since then. We have better hardware and electronics, which permit a person to handle a heavier boat more easily. Better deck hardware and roller bearing blocks make it easier to handle bigger sails and low friction steering gear and the lower steering loads of fin keel spade rudder configuration make it possible to person to steer a larger boat for longer periods. We expect more features on a boat, which also adds weight. We motor more today than our predecessors and so need to carry more fuel which adds more weight in fuel and bigger engines (which may also be why we motor more). This is partially offset by the ability to build stronger and lighter boats than our forefathers.

Because of my performance orientation, I personally favor a boat with an all up weight closer to 12,500 lb. or so displacement for a long distance cruiser for two people (which works out to a partial load weight of about 10,500 lbs.). Today, you see more and more people typically opting for displacements of 17,000 lbs. on up to 24,000 lbs. and beyond. As I have said before, I strongly believe that weight in and of itself does nothing good for a boat. It does not make it strong, or more seaworthy, or stable, or comfortable, or able to carry more gear and supplies. It simply adds weight. And weight hurts speed and makes a boat harder to handle in all conditions.

In my conversations with designers of modern (and I emphasize the word "modern") long distance cruisers, a Displacement/ Length ratio of about 160 based on a partial load weight seems to be about a practical minimum and that would result in a boat with an approximately 31 foot waterline. That is how I arrived at a 38-footer being about ideal for my needs.

If you look at the more typical calculations of a displacement between 17,000 and 24,000 lbs. and the more common L/D of 200 to 300 that yields a waterline length between 31 and 37 feet or an overall length of 38 to 42 feet or so. To me a 40 -42 feet boat is a lot of boat to handle for two people. I know it is done routinely but I also see boats this size being motored or not out sailing on a lot of days when I see the water full of smaller craft under sail. To have any kind of decent performance you need pretty deep draft or the complexity of a centerboard or wing keels.

Then there is rig. I personally am a big fan of the fractional sloop rigs. You see a lot of this rig in areas of the world with big winds and a fair amount in light air regions as well. The nice thing about the fractional rig is the speed and precision with which you can depower without reefing or changing sails. It really allows a quick throttling up and down for the conditions. The smaller headsails on a fractional rig are much easier to haul about the boat, store and to tack. With a fractional rig, you have a better chance of getting by without an overlapping jib through a wide range of wind speeds and you need few headsails to suit the conditions.

That said, in more traditional circles, cutters seem to be the favored for long range cruising. I really hate dragging a forestaysail across the jibstay, especially in any breeze at all. I have also gotten caught aback when a forestaysail hung up on the jibstay in high winds. To me it really makes sense to have the jibstay de-mountable so that it can be stowed at the mast in normal conditions. I also prefer a knockabout cutter (no bowsprit) as it is not a great idea to have the mast solely supported by a forestay tacked to the end of a bowsprit.

For me there are a number of items that would be deal breakers.
-No teak decks!
I know of no way to build a teak deck that is a permanent solution. They are beautiful to look at but they are a major expense when they go bad which sooner or later they will.

-No full keels.
To me they represent too much of a compromise in sailing ability; speed, windward ability, maneuverability and loads on the helm. I know that there are strong arguments for both full keels and fin keels. I just happen to have no use for full keels in my idea of voyaging under sail.

-No encapsulated keels.
Having tried to repair them when they have been damaged I would not buy a boat with an encapsulated keel. That said there are some good arguments against keel bolts. That said, I have replaced keel bolts and repaired a water logged encapsulated keel. The keel bolts can be repaired good as new. Once an encapsulated keel has delaminated from the ballast as sooner or later it will there is no way to return that boat to full structural integrity.

So where does that leave us? Well, if someone said name one boat that makes sense for a couple to sail around the world, I would probably say a Valiant 40. It''s not my kind of boat but it is an easy first answer that would work for most people. I really like Brewer 12.8''s centerboard cutters, and they would also fall very high on my list. My father has had one for a number of years and I have been very impressed with these boats. (He''s thinking of selling his before too long.) I think that under $100K the Peterson 44''s are really nice boats and should really go the distance. Another boat that has always looked good to me is the Norseman 447 (and I think there was a 43 foot version has always looked good as well).

If I were going higher performance, wanted a bigger boat, I had the money and wanted a new boat, I think that the Morris 454 and the Aerodyne 47 both look very interesting, as does the Hunter HC 50. The Hunter is not your local cruisers kind of boat but is a serious offshore high performance cruiser constructed to a very impressively high standard. If you were going for something used, Bruce Farr designed a series of fast cruising boats back in the late 1970''s and early 1980''s. these were mostly constructed as one-offs, but in many ways they are my ideal cruising boat. There were 38''s, and 40''s, as well as, a 42, 44, and 48 that I have hear of. I was aboard a 52 that just knocked my socks off.

I am sure I am overlooking many good boats and I don''t know if this is helpful to you but it does represent my thoughts on the matter. Good luck to you!


07-19-2001 07:23 PM
To Jeff H

i would have to pick either an amel super marimu or the older amel mango.
even though i had dinner with the owners of a tartan 37 called tigger that circumnavigated in her.
07-19-2001 05:10 PM
To Jeff H

Jeff H

Here is my problem. Iíve been trying to find a boat for quite a while now but the thing is, every dealer I go to say that they have the right stuff for me. I need a boat that will go the distance, a good solid relatively fast offshore boat, capable of making long distances, easy to handle by a young couple in 40 to 50 feet range, something I could relay on for a long time that will take me Ēaround the world and backĒ. I do have some sailing experience but that is not what I want to talk about. The big question is how do I choose the right one, what are the things I should look for when making the right choice, how do I recognize a good offshore boat from a piece of sÖ., which builders in your opinion I should look at, which ones to avoid. Or maybe what would you buy if you had an unlimited budget with at least 10 years of sailing in mind.With all respect to all other posters Iím asking you to answer these questions because Iíve read a lot of your opinions on this message board and you seem like an experienced person who knows what is talking about, however anybody is more then welcome to place their opinions as well.
I have looked at several boats (Hans Christianís Offshore Explorer, Cabo Rico 42, Bowmanís 48, Nordic 40, Tartan 44, and many more) some of them I liked some didnít.
What do you think is the ultimate offshore sailing boat?

My regards

To all of you here is an interesting link

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome