|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|08-20-2014 01:26 PM|
Re: Catalina 400 MKII draft
I ended up getting hull #206 and just loved it. Don't think there is a faster, sturdier, more comfortable cruiser in her size. Though after having her over 3 years, I now have her for sale as I'm looking to increase boat size. Speed doesn't matter as much to me anymore as a few other things. That being said, I made a tight pinch from Havana to Key West last year in 30+ knot winds and sailed the whole way. Double reefed the main, and rolled in the furling (upgraded to North sails). Had the current with me with the wind against me. Made for LARGE waves. Cockpit was still dry. Very few other boats could have made that journey under sail and dry. Good luck with your purchase.
|08-20-2014 12:14 PM|
Re: Catalina 400 MKII draft
I had a Catalina 400 Mk II Hull 297 hauled for survey last Friday. The surveyor measured the draft while in the sling and I was delighted that as she is presently loaded she is drawing 5' 2". The boat only had 1/4 tank of diesel and I don't know how much was in the water / holding tanks.
Catalina's reported draft of 5' 4" might reflect anticipating loading the boat down a bit. Surveyor said that I could expect the boat to sink 1" for every 1,500 lbs.
|06-22-2011 10:30 AM|
I'm looking to buy a C-400 and am curious about what changed in 2006.
the way I read this the wing keel changed on hull 307 which I'm guessing to be about late 2004 to make for a lesser draft. Was there more changes to the keel to make the new england PHRF rating be 120 pre-2006 and 102 post-2006? Thanks
|09-24-2010 07:39 AM|
If 5' is your number, you need to avoid the 400 alltogether. Maybe teh 42 would work, but that might even be stretching it. I think you should turn your search to an IP or get used to waiting for tides. I choise to wait fo rtides. But very few large boats will have a 5' draft (true 5') and don't forget that is when she is dry, no crap on them, etc. Now fill tem with a bunch of junk, especially cruising gear, and you can easily tack on 3 inches or more.
The problem with the IP's, which I am not a fan of, if that tehy are crappy performers and don't point well and do not back well. Make my boat look like she backs on rails. Any other comperable boat will easily exceed teh 5' draft with many of the better boats approaching 7. Maybe you should also consider a catamaran, if you can fit it. But if you need 5', I would avoid the 400 alltogether. You could probably get a used IP in the 300's that is failry new and in the 40' range. Not sure what other choices there really are.
|09-23-2010 08:48 PM|
Yes draft is a major issue where I sail out of. A 5' draft is fine but any more puts more time between tides for me to get out and sail and then get back into my canal. Thanks for the advice and the great notes about the boat. I will call Jerry.
|09-22-2010 12:26 PM|
|carl762||I want one bad.|
|09-22-2010 07:36 AM|
Incidentally, we did informally sail (I wouldn't call it a race) against a B40 on our C400. He ran faster than we did. However, not that much faster. And it was not fair because his was a brand new boat (and bottom), no inmast, and not decked out for cruising. We had a LOT of stuff on our boat, including the solar panels, tender and davits, and all of our LA junk and toys for kids, etc. I am not convinced teh B40 would be any/much faster than the 400.
You keep bringing up the draft on the boat. Curious why that is so critical to you? Are you in skinny water?
|09-21-2010 08:54 PM|
1. I was looking for in-mast furling. I've been very happy with it so far. However, if you are wanting to race, then I would get a standard main with a Stack-pack or equivalent. If you do that, and are buying a new boat, spring for a power winch on the cabin top.
2. No clue. I don't live in an area needing AC. A furnace OTOH, is something that I'll need to install.
3. No bow thruster and while it might be nice, I have no plans to install one. Part of me admits to not liking a large hole in the bow.
4. Mine has a 130%, high footed genoa. For 10-15 knots of wind it is a very comfortable and well performing sail. Again, if you want to race, then make sure you have a double headfoil so you can add a larger headsail for light air.
So far, I'm very happy with the boat. Contrary to CD, I don't think the 400 has much prop-walk at all. I have the standard 3 blade prop. Maybe it is a difference between the fin and wing keel?
If you are going to be buying a new boat in that price range, I would seriously look at both the 400 and the 445. The 445 is an amazing boat. It sails well, is beautiful, and the interior is one of the best designed I've ever seen. I think Catalina has really designed a great boat with the 445. However, I didn't buy one for two reasons:
1. I like master berth in the 400 better for my wife and I. We are both tall and not skinny. The aft berth is wonderful. The forward berth in the 445 is a bit tight for us.
2. The extra 4 feet makes the 445 harder to fit places here in the Puget Sound. I can find guest slips still with a 40 foot boat (really 40.5 but when asked I say 40). It gets much harder at 44 feet.
Many Catalina dealers would love to get a 445 in the water in their area for the regional boat shows. You could make a deal on a new 445 that could be about the same price as a 400 if you buy both new. Also, there are some "extras" on the 400 that are "standard" on the 445, reducing the price differential somewhat.
So for design, I'd go with the 445. For the cabin layout and size, I went with the 400 and couldn't be happier.
|09-21-2010 06:29 PM|
How to reach Jerry Douglas of Catalina Yachts
I think talking to Jerry would be great. Do you have his email so I can ask him about the draft and how they can achieve a 5' draft or less?
|09-21-2010 07:37 AM|
|This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|