SailNet Community - Reply to Topic

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest > General Discussion (sailing related) > 92 footer VS coal carrier
 Not a Member? 


Thread: 92 footer VS coal carrier Reply to Thread
Title:
  

By choosing to post the reply below you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below


Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Click here to view the posting rules you are bound to when clicking the
'Submit Reply' button below


Topic Review (Newest First)
10-02-2006 07:52 PM
jgeltz Nice boat...

http://quintess.com/essence/d2621
10-02-2006 02:42 PM
nolatom I think I read that collision was about 0403. This would've been change-of-watch time for the typical large ship, and the relief of watch can be a distraction from lookout. Seems many collisions happen at 8, 12, and 4 as a result.

And ships usually show some house lights aside from the nav. lights, while a sailboat, even a large one, may show only a white stern light if you're overtaking her, and a white light is easier to lose in background lighting ashore than the red or green would be if you're meeting or crossing.

These are just general observations, I'm not trying to speculate here since we don't know the facts, just the result.
10-02-2006 02:21 PM
Bob1112 The area of Long Island Sound where the accident occurred can have a fair amount of backlighting from the shorelines (there are two; the Connecticut shore to the North and the New York shore to the South). It can be very hard at times to pick up navigation lights or government markers. The masts are invisible at night (If the sails are also up, they can be visible, but even in that case, somebody needs to shine a light on them to make them visible). Radar can be tricky; the collier probably presented a good target, while the sailboat (even a large one) may or may not. But what was the radar range setting? If set at 12 miles in Long Island Sound, it is of limited value, since both shorelines are the main reflection (it looks like you are going through a lit-up funnel).

There are so many possibilities; we will have to see if any further facts are made public.
10-02-2006 11:10 AM
btrayfors Clear weather, good visibility, early morning hours, no land, buoys, or other obstructions for miles....

Here's my bet: somebody, or somebodies, were below, off the bridge, and/or fell asleep while the boat/ship was on autopilot.

Can't think of any other reasonable explanation, except that the autopilot may have been thrown off by the huge mass of steel nearby...sometimes happens...but even if it did the watchkeeper, if awake, present, quick and competent, should have been able to disengage it.

Bill
10-02-2006 10:53 AM
nolatom
Quote:
Originally Posted by sailingdog
It is hard to imagine that they couldn't see a boat that is almost 100' long...with masts sticking up from it that are probably 60' or more in height..
And equally hard to understand that the sailing (or motorsailing?) vessel (which if 92' likely had radar? And definitely had VHF? and one, maybe both, had AIS?) wouldn't see a 600' coal collier either. Understand both were eastbound at about 0430. Don't know what the visibility was.

Very sad that there was a fatality.
10-02-2006 06:50 AM
sailingdog It is hard to imagine that they couldn't see a boat that is almost 100' long...with masts sticking up from it that are probably 60' or more in height..
10-01-2006 10:49 PM
kimberlite
92 footer VS coal carrier

Any news updates as to how the accident happened?
fair winds,
eric

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.