SailNet Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: Question about in-boom furling & in-mast furling Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
03-27-2012 09:33 PM
msogin
Re: Question about in-boom furling & in-mast furling

Quote:
Originally Posted by KIVALO View Post
Hello everyone,
I did a quick search about this and couldn't find what I was looking for. It would seem that in-mast furling has become vastly more common than in-boom furling. There must be a reason and my question is what is that reason? I have no intention of installing either on my boat, I was merely curious.

Of course if my assessment is wrong someone please correct me on that.

Thanks in advance.
Brad
s/v KIVALO
With an inboom furler the mainsail can have both roach and full battens. This comes at the expense of having less or no control on the outhaul. THe other advantage is both in mast and in boom furlers can jam but with an in boom furling system it is usually possible to lower the sail even if jammed. In boom furlers are much more expensive.
03-27-2012 08:23 PM
tdw
Re: Question about in-boom furling & in-mast furling

I've always thought that in boom seemed to make so much more sense than in mast but having now some experience with in mast and having looked at the size of in boom furlers I'm tending to favour in mast. Furling into the mast gives you a relatively thin tube of sail, into the boom it gets a hell of a lot chunkier.
03-27-2012 07:54 PM
Faster
Re: Question about in-boom furling & in-mast furling

$$$$ COST $$$$$

In boom is more expensive.. but honestly I'm not sure why. Makes more sense on a number of fronts, perhaps they have more issues feeding into/out of the mast track?? Easier to roll out a sail than actually hoist it?
03-27-2012 07:39 PM
KIVALO
Question about in-boom furling & in-mast furling

Hello everyone,
I did a quick search about this and couldn't find what I was looking for. It would seem that in-mast furling has become vastly more common than in-boom furling. There must be a reason and my question is what is that reason? I have no intention of installing either on my boat, I was merely curious.

Of course if my assessment is wrong someone please correct me on that.

Thanks in advance.
Brad
s/v KIVALO

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome