Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Blogs               
Boat Search (new)






Go Back   SailNet Community > General Interest Forums > Off Topic
User Name
Password
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
 Like this article?  Digg It!  or   Bookmark it!
  #1971 (permalink)  
Old 06-28-2009
ssneade's Avatar
ssneade ssneade is offline
Columbia Contender #237
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: marble hill, ga
Posts: 623
Rep Power: 1
ssneade is on a distinguished road
This is important: “They” want to tax your production of CO2. Does this mean that CO2 is a problem, and that the control of CO2 is a solution? If NOT, and if (as seems very likely) those at the ROOT of the global warming movement (not necessarily the most visible myrmidons) know it is not, then it’s just your money they are after. CO2 is the tool they use to take your money and control you. Surprise! Most global warming alarmist do not seem to understand science very well. In particular, they do not understand CO2. They uses the “greenhouse” terminology and the “blanket” analogy as though rectification drives reality. In fact, CO2 in the atmosphere does not constitute a greenhouse, since convection is not impeded, as actual glass (but not gas) would do. Neither is it a blanket in the sense that an extra blanket on your bed warms you. Extra CO2 is redundant – there are already enough CO2 molecules to capture nearly every infrared photon in the relevant bandwidth. Imagine a baseball field with 100 outfielders. Most of them would be standing around, and nearly every fly ball is caught. Now make that 200 outfielders. There are many many other myths about CO2. But, since CO2 is not important in the way it is generally used in the global warming discussion, refuting these myths, while informative and entertaining (and readily available), is basically beside the point. CO2 is just something to TAX – and, pretend it’s a noble endeavor! It’s a fraud.
__________________
Sea Ya!
Reply With Quote
  #1972 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2009
OsmundL's Avatar
OsmundL OsmundL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Norway (sometimes)
Posts: 268
Rep Power: 1
OsmundL is on a distinguished road
Rational? well...

Free markets presume that we act rationally, but we don’t. We’re completely ga-ga.
Why, 2 weeks ago I got 2nd degree burns on my foot trying to converse with a seagull. The gull won’t even look at me now, she’s so embarrassed.
During winter I bought vitamin tablets and a field mouse ate the packet. He is now a modern day Popeye or Batman among mates. I feel obliged to house him, since I burnt down his home three years ago along with 2-3 acres. Twenty volunteer firefighters saved the rest of the forest.
I don’t like silver, so I sold the family set. This week on a brief return attending to business I find myself eating with plastic knives; I had to buy take-away coffee to have the cardboard cup for the stay. Can’t buy meat, not with a plastic knife, so it’s veggies and fruit for now.
My friend for years is a vegetarian. Her CO2 emissions are right up there with a cow’s. We need emission controls on vegetarians.
Is there a parallel universe? If so, dad was handyman there. The only nail he handled in his life stuck through his thumb. Every Christmas we gave him a lighter and others gave him fountain pens, ballpoints, only the best. When the lighter or pen needed refill, he put it in a drawer. I found more than 20 lighters and Parkers in his drawer, the ones that “didn’t work.”
I traded my 15’ runabout for two arch windows. They’re in storage; nobody knows when they can be installed. This is a way better deal than dad who had a same-size boat and traded it for a bottle of red. He couldn’t find the oars, so it didn’t work.
Friday, I put candelabra in the windowsill in 90˚F; the candles took on the shape of Clinton’s penis. One of them is a complete U.
My own penis? I could find it if Musto HPX trousers were not a sack with a 20-inch high barrier in front; no exit for sizes shorter than an elephant’s trunk.
Could we have rules and laws to protect the Earth from people like us, please? The free market doesn’t cut it. In that market I frequently win, so there must be people even dumber than I. Lord save us.

Now excuse me, I have to feed a seagull.
Reply With Quote
  #1973 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2009
camaraderie's Avatar
camaraderie camaraderie is offline
moderate?
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 13,910
Rep Power: 10
camaraderie is a jewel in the roughcamaraderie is a jewel in the roughcamaraderie is a jewel in the rough
Os...spending too much time north of Mo i Rana are we??
__________________
www.anything-sailing.com
"Not too cold...not too hot...just right!"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ad
  #1974 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2009
ssneade's Avatar
ssneade ssneade is offline
Columbia Contender #237
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: marble hill, ga
Posts: 623
Rep Power: 1
ssneade is on a distinguished road
os, you're a riot!
__________________
Sea Ya!
Reply With Quote
  #1975 (permalink)  
Old 06-29-2009
ssneade's Avatar
ssneade ssneade is offline
Columbia Contender #237
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: marble hill, ga
Posts: 623
Rep Power: 1
ssneade is on a distinguished road
here we go....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg globalwarming.jpg (46.9 KB, 71 views)
__________________
Sea Ya!
Reply With Quote
  #1976 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
craigimass craigimass is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Mass. and RI
Posts: 904
Rep Power: 1
craigimass is on a distinguished road
No doubt!
Look at that chart.
You fools, doubting the stats again.

You can look at bathing suits too. Even shorts.....well, if we go by shorts they got shorter in the 70's, but a little longer now. Just a blip on the charts though.
__________________
"I do not conceive we can exist long as a nation without having lodged somewhere a power which will pervade the whole Union in as energetic a manner as the authority of the state governments extends over the individual states"
-George Washington
Reply With Quote
  #1977 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
cardiacpaul's Avatar
cardiacpaul cardiacpaul is offline
MarineSurveyor
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: finally, back home in Texas
Posts: 2,838
Rep Power: 6
cardiacpaul is a jewel in the roughcardiacpaul is a jewel in the roughcardiacpaul is a jewel in the rough
Os,

We don't agree on too much, but that was funny as all hell, luv ya man.
__________________
We are not primarily on earth to see through one another, but to see one another through

Some people are like slinkies: not really good for anything... but you can't help laughing when you push them down the stairs
Reply With Quote
  #1978 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
ssneade's Avatar
ssneade ssneade is offline
Columbia Contender #237
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: marble hill, ga
Posts: 623
Rep Power: 1
ssneade is on a distinguished road
IF YOU ARE AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING ...

... then you are against the world! Yep, this is the new line from liberals and Democrats. If you are against this climate change, cap-and-trade legislation that is making its way through Congress, then you are basically immoral.

Let's start with Henry Waxman, who is one of the chief architects of this cap-and-trade scheme. In response to the Republicans who voted against his plan, he says: "They [Republicans] want to play politics and see if they can keep any achievements from being accomplished that may be beneficial to the Democrats. They're rooting against the country and I think in this case, even rooting against the world because the world needs to get its act together to stop global warming."

Then, we get this from Paul Krugman in The New York Times. He writes, "A handful of these no votes came from representatives who considered the bill too weak, but most rejected the bill because they rejected the whole notion that we have to do something about greenhouse gases. And as I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn't help thinking that I was watching a form of treason -- treason against the planet. To fully appreciate the irresponsibility and immorality of climate-change denial, you need to know about the grim turn taken by the latest climate research."

Treason ... rooting against the world ... immorality ... wow, do these guys have a high opinion of their fraudulent cause or what? ......
__________________
Sea Ya!
Reply With Quote
  #1979 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
camaraderie's Avatar
camaraderie camaraderie is offline
moderate?
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 13,910
Rep Power: 10
camaraderie is a jewel in the roughcamaraderie is a jewel in the roughcamaraderie is a jewel in the rough
No worries SSneade....they get more SHRILL as they feel themselves losing control and supporters and public opinion turns away from their "settled" "science".
__________________
www.anything-sailing.com
"Not too cold...not too hot...just right!"
Reply With Quote
  #1980 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009
ssneade's Avatar
ssneade ssneade is offline
Columbia Contender #237
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: marble hill, ga
Posts: 623
Rep Power: 1
ssneade is on a distinguished road
Patrick Moore Wisely Questions Global Warming Alarmism and Advocates Nuclear Energy

Speaking before an audience in Boise, Idaho last week, Greenpeace Founder Dr. Patrick Moore confirmed that there is no proof that humans are causing global warming, and he wisely advocated a dramatic shift toward reliance upon nuclear power.

In light of the fact that Greenpeace was originally established for the very purpose of opposing underground nuclear testing, it is refreshing that someone in our current “gotcha” political culture acknowledges the facts when they contradict his previous policy agenda. In other words, perhaps even Al Gore will ultimately see the light and disown his silly and self-serving global warming crusade.

Dr. Moore, who today represents the Clean Air and Safe Energy Coalition, believes that the only viable way to reduce America’s reliance upon fossil fuels and foreign energy sources is to add hundreds of safe nuclear power plants in upcoming decades. Although he acknowledges that solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and other renewable energy sources can assist in this transition, they simply don’t possess the enormous potential that nuclear energy does, in his opinion.

Naturally, radical environmentalists reflexively accused Dr. Moore of selling out, because their other arguments against nuclear power have evaporated during recent years. So how does Dr. Moore respond to these accusations? He merely points out that his professional and educational backgrounds are in actual science, whereas people whose backgrounds lie in political activism dominate Greenpeace.

And Dr. Moore is correct. The simple fact is that nuclear power provides America’s cleanest, safest, most reliable, cheapest and most independent source of future energy.

Nuclear energy emits none of the so-called “greenhouse gases” that environmentalists claim warm the globe, so one would assume that they would enthusiastically embrace it. But alas, environmentalists continue to irrationally oppose nuclear energy at every turn, oblivious to their contradictory positions.

With 103 reactors in operation across the United States, nuclear power today provides twenty percent of America’s electricity, our second-largest source. By the year 2030, this is expected to expand to twenty-five percent, even as American energy consumption increases. Even France, a nation that those on the left typically wish to imitate, generates over 76% of its electricity through nuclear energy. Despite this, the environmentalist lobby remains unpersuaded.

Additionally, the uranium from which nuclear energy plants obtain their power exists in abundance within the United States, as well as Canada and Australia. Accordingly, nuclear energy allows Americans to reduce reliance upon the Middle East, Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela and other undependable nations such as Nigeria.

Moreover, unlike other renewable energy sources such as solar, wind and hydropower, nuclear reactors do not depend upon unreliable weather or fluctuating natural conditions, rendering it far more reliable. It is also less-subject to skyrocketing commodity prices and foreign suppliers than other energy sources, such as oil or natural gas.

And in terms of safety, a person would have to live next to a nuclear plant for over 2,000 years to receive the amount of radiation created by a single medical x-ray. Nuclear generators are also better-protected against terrorism and other calamity than other plants, as the Center for Strategic and International Studies found that nuclear plants “are probably our best-defended targets.” And despite such overhyped media creations as Three Mile Island, not a single life in America has ever been lost due to a nuclear malfunction or accident.

Nuclear energy also has the lowest production cost of the major sources of electricity, which helps lower everyday Americans’ monthly energy bills.

It thus becomes clear that nuclear power can help alleviate many of America’s increasing energy difficulties. It provides clean, reliable, safe and lower-cost energy, and can greatly reduce America’s dependence upon foreign sources.

Dr. Moore, Greenpeace’s Founder, has seen the light. The only question is when liberals and the rest of the obstructionist environmental lobby will do the same.
__________________
Sea Ya!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fight Club____for Sailors Surfesq Off Topic 5687 1 Day Ago 05:00 PM
New Passport rules kennya General Discussion (sailing related) 91 06-15-2007 09:43 PM
The Global Challenge waltward General Discussion (sailing related) 2 10-06-2004 06:34 PM
The BT Global Challenge—Halfway Around SailNet Racing Articles 0 03-11-2001 08:00 PM
BT Global Challenge—Adventure for a Price Dan Dickison Racing Articles 0 09-06-2000 09:00 PM

Page generated in 7.5602 seconds (77.05% PHP - 22.95% MySQL) with 16 queries
Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8
(c) Sailnet 2000-2006