Quote:
Originally Posted by sck5
And dont believe the polls right now. Remember, back in 92 Perot was in first place in June and Clinton was third. I suspect we are seeing McCain near his peak right around now.
|
Of course you do Sck, of course you do. You never want us to believe polls unless they are polls you post to back up a point you are trying to make.
The problem with Obama is "Change" with no reply to the "Change what, how" question.
Soon, when it gets to be a real debate he'll have to answer questions with real substantive plans, instead of a crowd of dreamers recited tired "I will fix the system" mantra's and getting away with it. I'd like to see him answer how in three short years as a senator he has racked up a total of 740 million bucks spent in earmarks, compared to John McCain with Zero dollars, ever. BTW my favorite earmark for 'change boy'? - this one:
Quote:
|
“But Obama's list raised questions because it includes $8 million for a defense contractor that has ties to one of his most prodigious campaign fundraisers. According to the earmark disclosure, the money was for a project overseen by General Dynamics. Obama's Illinois finance chairman, James S. Crown, serves on the company's board of directors, and his family holds a sizable stake in the firm. Crown and his wife, Paula Crown, are members of Obama's national finance committee and have raised more than $200,000 for the campaign, according to Obama's campaign Web site."
|
Clinton vs. Obama: Earmark wars - First Read - msnbc.com
Exactly what is it he's going to change? Oh, yeah, where the money and power goes.
My particularly favorite chuckle of the moment was/ is to offset the higher cost of gas, his plan is to give middle class families 1000 back from the payroll deduction tax most of us know as Social Security. I say most of us meaning republicans and independents, democratis know it a 'bucket of free money'.
His deal is that helps families because more than just gas prices is going up. I call it rob peter to pay paul, on credit and on steroids.
Democratic party 'let us help you' short sighted idiocy.
The problem? Social Security is already as is well known, short of money, chronically. Short term thinking like his is what caused it.
To me, it's vote pandering. he's buying votes of short sited "what's in it for me" idiots with a promise of 1k bucks.
Too offset the higher cost of gasoline, a) drive less, b) drive less, and c) quit spending money at McDonalds, Netflix, etc.. (i.e. cut back on extra's).