
02-11-2008
|
|
Owner, Green Bay Packers
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SW Michigan
Posts: 10,322
Rep Power: 9
|
|
|
Which can be good,Chuck, if the party doesn't lose sight of their objectives. If the goal merely becomes perpetuation of power, at the expense of first principles, then the party generally get's what it deserves; as the congressional Republicans can attest.
The hilarity of the article, for me, was that the peace at all costs crowd ever believed that they'd convinced the party as a whole of their objectives. A much more reasoned take on the matter, of which I posted an editorial from some obscure North Dakotan paper some time ago, is that the American people are much more against a war that we appear to not be winning than the war itself.
The anti-war left continues to hold it's head in the sand, not realizing what a big mistake they made with the General "Betray-us" ad, criticizing a general who was making real progress on the ground in Iraq. While the election of '06 may have been on the conduct of the war, times have now changed, as has the war, and we're on to other issues, of which the anti-war left is apparently oblivious.
It is though, with some pleasure, that we've observed the total fecklessness of the Democrat leadership, not only on the war but any other number of issues as well. Raising the minimum wage is thin gruel for the party faithful awaiting the new socialism. The Dem pols quickly abandoned first principles for survival, losing relevance in the process. Personally, congressional gridlock has it's attractions regardless of which party controls the congress.
__________________
“Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it.”
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.
|