Dear John R Pollard

[Giulietta]

JRP is a gay French monkey ugly dirty smelly bastard, with absolutely no sailing skills whatsoever, sailing an old shoe..so he will fit right in with the rest of the moderators...past and present....


I have something important I need to tell you. I anticipate it will result in my receiving a barrage of angry e-mail from John R Pollard accusing me of being mingy, but John's rhetorical performances could profitably be deconstructed in a Dishonest Use of Language class. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and carry out this matter to the full extent of the law. I am sick of hearing him intone with an authority reminiscent of Moses descending Sinai that the rigors that his victims have been called upon to undergo have been amply justified in the sphere of concrete achievement. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. His propaganda machine once said that he would never toss sops to the egos of the mudslinging. So much for credibility!

John has been trying for quite some time to convince us that Stalinism is the only alternative to teetotalism. I suggest he take this rotting ordure and dump it where he and his fellow insensate sociopaths congregate. At least then we could challenge him to defend his claims or else to change them without having to worry that he will mortgage away our future. That's all I'm going to say in this letter because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.

[Giulietta]

I am writing this letter because I recently heard some troubling news. Apparently, a large number of people actually believe John R Pollard's claim that violence and prejudice are funny. One of the first facts we should face is that his zingers are a veritable dictionary and synonymicon of moral relativism. For that reason, I've heard of unreasonable things like expansionism and anti-intellectualism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves -- ideas which John's ignorant, unthinking, stupid brain is too small to understand.

I've already said this a thousand times and with a thousand different phrasings, but it has been said that John should think for himself. I, in turn, warrant that if I were a complete sap, I'd believe John's line that I'm too thrasonical to reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from his half-measures. Unfortunately for him, I realize that I unquestionably dislike John. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that John's apothegms are merely a stalking horse. They mask his secret intention to bring discord, confusion, and frustration into our personal and public lives. You may detect disapproval and anger in my writing when I state that as commonly encountered, high-handed pettifoggers lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized person, like courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, and confidence. That disapproval and anger exists primarily because he claims that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. I think that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that a plan of rational reaction to John's cop-outs is in order. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to John.

John's dupes don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat nefarious.

John's monographs are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth. The significance of this is that if Fate desired that John make a correct application of what he had read about mandarinism it would have to indicate title and page number since the censorious savage would otherwise never in all his life find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, John's statements such as "Big emotions come from big words" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. What I just wrote is not based on merely a single experience or anecdote. Rather, it is based upon the wisdom of accumulated years, spanning two continents, and proven by the fact that all the deals he makes are strictly one-way. John gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations.

I call upon John to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Now that you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a surprise that John R Pollard's magic-bullet explanations are absolutely otiose. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would trade facts for fantasy, truth for myths, academics for collective socialization, and individual thinking for group manipulation. I am referring, of course, to the likes of John R Pollard.

[Giulietta]

Most people probably think they already know all they need to know about Sailnet, but I have some new information to bring to light. I want to share this with you because knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that Sailnet's loathsome newsgroup postings palliate and excuse the atrocities of its agents provocateurs. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to discuss, openly and candidly, a vision for a harmonious, multiracial society. Rather than pick out appropriate verbs and nouns, Sailnet pads all of its sentences with extra syllables to grant them an atmosphere of authority. I, on the other hand, prefer to use simple language to express the sentiment that I can't possibly believe Sailnet's claim that black is white and night is day. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because if Sailnet continues to produce culturally degenerate films and tapes, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.

Sailnet accuses me of being hate-filled, yet it is it who is filled with hate. And it accuses me of being bigoted, while its apothegms show nothing but bigotry. Why does Sailnet make those sorts of accusations, then? I could give you the answer now but it would be more productive for me first to inform you that those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Sailnet had learned anything from history, it'd know that its buddies consider its schemes a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of neopaganism.

I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Sailnet for trying to declare that it can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, there are some bloodthirsty psychopaths who are brutal. There are also some who are atrabilious. Which category does Sailnet fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". Anyway, that's it for this letter. Let Sailnet read it and weep.

[Giulietta]

I have been following the stories and comments surrounding John R Pollard, and frankly, I'm appalled. What sort of severe tunnel vision has led John to maintain that he would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a pharisaical act? Let us note first of all that there is something grievously wrong with those stultiloquent, benighted converts to absenteeism who paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. Shame on the lot of them! Let's get reasonable; people tell me that capricious franions and people of similar psychological type are often inspired by his objectives. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. If John had two brain cells to rub together, he'd realize that he is too wrongheaded to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that it would be a mistake to believe that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. So let him call me sexist. I call him hypersensitive.

It's best to ignore most of the quotes that John so frequently cites. He takes quotes of of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and, presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, I realize that the tone of this letter may be making some people feel uneasy. However, even if you're somewhat uncomfortable reading about John's poxy, aberrant shell games please don't blame me for them. I'm not the one turning scamps loose against us good citizens. I'm not the one forcing me to fall into the traps set for me by John's grunts. And I'm not the one giving rise to dodgy cutthroats.

In retrospect, John has always been more recalcitrant than most lamebrained, vitriolic knuckleheads. What do we owe him? Nothing, absolutely nothing. If John claims otherwise, we have to stand firm and point out that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to his précis. It applies to everything John says and does. There are no two ways about it; he can't possibly believe that the media should "create" news rather than report it. He's obtuse but he's not that obtuse. Let us now reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning because in that is our only hope for the future.

[Giulietta]

Having just been exposed to John R Pollard's obstreperous mind games, I ponder how best to express my disgust at John's total lack of sensitivity and reasoning. Although not without overlap and simplification, I plan to identify three primary positions on John's subliminal psywar campaigns. I acknowledge that I have not accounted for all possible viewpoints within the parameters of these three positions. Nevertheless, Jacobinism is the modern analogue of slavery. The facts are indisputable, the arguments are impeccable, and the consequences are undeniable. So why does John aver that he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom? I can give you only my best estimate, made after long and anxious consideration, but I do not pose as an expert in these matters. I can say only that he extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice. Time has only reinforced that conviction. There, my ranting is finished.

[sailaway21]

I'm trying to remember the name of the member, the rat bast***, who gave Giu that program. May he rot in .............

[Giulietta]

This letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about Sailaway21 but will, in most cases, confirm them. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Sailaway21's covinous indoctrination and is consequently believable. I can't make heads or tails of his vaporings. I mean, does Sailaway21 want to subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community or doesn't he?

Most other pugnacious cads are not as politically incorrect as they seem. Why do I tell you this? Because these days, no one else has the guts to. You won't find many of Sailaway21's shills who will openly admit that they favor Sailaway21's schemes to exercise control through indirect coercion or through psychological pressure or manipulation. In fact, their grievances are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary. If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that Sailaway21's more than warped. He's mega-warped. In fact, to understand just how warped Sailaway21 is, you first need to realize that he is more than merely fickle. He's über-fickle. In fact, Sailaway21's so fickle that I want you to know that we must stand united as free, sovereign individuals and make this world a kinder, gentler place. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to deal with the relevant facts.

As we all know, Sailaway21's disquisitions are pockmarked with disingenuous sadism and other assorted ills. I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that Sailaway21's bait-and-switch tactics are one part Comstockism, two parts irreligionism, and the second is that it has been said that I am not complaining about that. I, in turn, aver that his peons argue that his canards are good for the environment, human rights, and baby seals. These are the same brain-damaged ragamuffins who preach a propaganda of hate. This is no coincidence; to Sailaway21's mind, space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. So that means that the majority of pesky vulgarians are heroes, if not saints, right? No, not right. The truth is that the whole of Sailaway21's debauched worldview may perhaps be expressed in one simple word. That word is "separatism". Let me explain: Documents written by Sailaway21's cheerleaders typically include the line, "Sailaway21 is the way, the truth, and the light", in large, 30-point type, as if the size of the font gives weight to the words. In reality, all that that fancy formatting really does is underscore the fact that my position is that Sailaway21's warnings will come back to bite us in the behind in a matter of days. He, in contrast, argues that at birth every living being is assigned a celestial serial number or frequency power spectrum. This disagreement merely scratches the surface of the ideological chasm festering between me and Sailaway21. The only rational way to bridge this chasm is for him to admit that if he feels ridiculed by all the attention my letters are bringing him, then that's just too darn bad. Sailaway21's arrogance has brought this upon himself. To conclude, Sailaway21 wins warmongers over to his side using big words like "internationalization".

[sailaway21]

I want to subordinate all spheres of matters Portagee to an ideological vision of sanity.

[KODAD]

I like monkeys.

[Spiritman]

I like neopagan franions. A little garlic and butter.....