Vinylester and PSC 34 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Chat  
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > Boat Builders Row > Pacific Seacraft
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-17-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Chestdoc is on a distinguished road
Vinylester and PSC 34

Hi, I am considering buying a used PSC 34. I have heard that boats from the early and mid-80's had their fair share of osmotic blisters. Does anyone know what year PSC started using vinylester resin? Looking at a 1987 boat.

Thanks,

David
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 11-17-2008
orientalnc2010's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: oriental NC
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
orientalnc2010 is on a distinguished road
Hi David,
There is a 1986 PSC34 currently for sale and in the description it states that pacific seacraft did not use vinylester resin before 1988.
Regards,
Steve
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 11-18-2008
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
David,

Unfortunately, the cut-off for vinylester isn't quite so black and white as a date certain, because PSC initially offered vinylester as an option. So there are some boats during the 1988-1989 period that have it, and some that don't.

By 1990 all the boats had vinylester. Most boats built in 1989 will have it too. 1988 boats will be hit or miss (more miss than hit). Pre-1988 boats will not have vinylester.

That said, if the boat your are looking at is more or less blister free (get a survey!), then lack of vinylester would not be a deal breaker for me.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 11-19-2008
MC1 MC1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lake Ontario
Posts: 277
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
MC1 is on a distinguished road
I'll defer to the experts here, but personally I'd tend to be a little worried about not having the vinylester. Given the boat's age, I think I'd at least consider stripping the hull and putting several new barrier coats on of a color different than the fouling paint so I could see if it got scratched or otherwise comprimised along the way.
-MC1
PSC 34 #307
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 11-19-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Chestdoc is on a distinguished road
Thanks

Thank you all for the info and advice. I was looking at a 1987 but maybe I ought to consider a 1990 model. However I will check her for blistering first, cause I really am in love with her.

David
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 11-20-2008
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 16
wmjr is on a distinguished road
87 blisters?

David,

My 31 is an '88 - well, an 88 the way a car you bought last month will be called a 2009. My boat was built in '87. Pacific Seacraft looked through the records but could not confirm if it had vinylester or not. (Is there a visual way to find out?)

It is in the water 12 months a year (California) and has no sign of blisters. I just had the bottom painted in August and it still looks great.

If you really love the '87 it might be worth the risk if it still looks good. I must admit the prospect of possible blisters someday still makes me a little nervous but I expect to keep loving this boat for life.

John Van Dinther
Watermark
PSC 31 #28
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 11-25-2008
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Marshfield
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
pomerantz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chestdoc View Post
Thank you all for the info and advice. I was looking at a 1987 but maybe I ought to consider a 1990 model. However I will check her for blistering first, cause I really am in love with her.

David
I have an '87. It had an epoxy barrier coat. One season, some years ago, I had the bottom sanded down and reapplied the barrier coat. It's a nasty job, but not hugely expensive. If you don't see blisters, you could have a boatyard sand it (that's the nasty part) and then you could apply the four coats of barrier epoxy yourself. If you see blisters, that's another matter entirely.

My boat is in northern salt water, so less likely to blister, but there are no blisters at all and the hull has no delamination according to a recent survey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 01-05-2009
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the boat.
Posts: 44
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
unomio is on a distinguished road
I'd check the boat you're interested in before nixing it permanently. We owned PS 37 #43, delivered new to us in 1983, for over 20 years. The boat developed some minor blisters right around the turn of the bilge and skeg. We had those repaired and and epoxy barrier put on the bottom. We kept the boat for another five years or so in Southern California. When the new (then prospective) owner had the boat surveyed prior to purchasing, there was no problem with blistering.

Sue
PSC 40#60 Fugue
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.