
05-08-2010
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 0
|
|
|
We sold the boat about three years ago, so this is from my memory banks which are not as functional as they should be. There was a teak "cup" epoxied to the inside of the hull. The bottom of the pole rested upon the cup. A hole was drilled through the deck on the port side of the stern locker and a collar was placed around the spot where the pole came through the deck. The strut part is an area of uncertainty for me. I am certain that there were a couple of struts to the railing at appropriate angles for optimal support, but there may have been one down to the deck also.
We were very careful to to place it too close to the stern cleat so it would have full functionality and have room for a couple of dock lines. The present owner of the boat is from the Chicago area, and if I'm not mistaken, the boat is still in local waters, in Anacortes, Washington. If he's a visitor of this site, perhaps he'll give more details.
As I mentioned earlier, we have a very similar set up with our present boat, a PS 40.
As you're well aware, there are tradeoffs on every decision regarding a boat. We have acquaintances who chose to solve the problem with an arch, and it is an attractive installation with room for solar panels, and I suppose a wind generator.
One thing you may want to investigate regarding placement of a pole is whether it will interfere with a sling lifting your boat. That wasn't the case with our 37, but our 40 has to be pulled by a much larger lift because of the pole's position, and not the boat's size. I hadn't thought of that before we were hauled out.
If you wish, I'll send more detailed pictures of the 40's installation.
Good luck,
Paul
|