
02-06-2011
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 553
Rep Power: 7
|
|
If your "mechanic" didn't do a wet compression test, you have no basis to rebuild this motor. Any time you do a compression test, you should expect as you proceed to the next cylinder, after 4-5 dry compression strokes to see a declining pressures cylinder after cylinder. Also if the engine is not perfectly level, you would also not expect to have the highest cylinder as oiled as the opposite end of the engine, which will be sitting closer to the oil level that splashes, and lubricates that cylinder more. Only with the wet and dry #'s do you achieve the basis for a leak down test. A dry test only, does nothing but sell you a rebuild, or remove liability when something eventually happens. You would be better off pocketing the $5000.00 and putting it toward a proper rebuild, when you need it in the future. Also since all of the cylinders are under 15% difference in pressure, there is no basis for a rebuild, especially since there is a probability that the person preforming the test may have not seated the compression tester correctly, or possibly cranked the engine with different # of strokes per cylinder. Of course that could be weeded out with the wet test.
__________________
Why, why, why? To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|