
01-11-2008
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,522
Rep Power: 8
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAGNAR
IMHO the issue with Paul is the same issue with 9o% of libertarians. They see the need for freedom, but take it as a premise, not a concussion of a massive, intricate argument. Without a thorough understanding of the foundations that make freedom moral, they're vulnerable to child-level errors.
|
I'm not defending them, but libertarians just have a different perspective.
I don't mean they have a different philosophy, I mean, literally, they have a different perspective, they are looking at the world from a different place on the earth. There was a libertarian candidate near here recently who did extremely well in the mountains, back in some very rural areas. He didn't even campaign there as far as I know, those people just naturally knew what he was talking about and they obviously liked what they were hearing. I think the further away from civilization you get, the more libertarians you are going to find, even if they don't call themselves that. The libertarian message is a rural message, and it's a perfectly valid one if you look at the world from a rural perspective.
__________________
What are you pretending not to know ?
|