Quote:
Originally Posted by cardiacpaul
Well where was the gov 't in all this?
NOWHERE! WHY? BECAUSE THERE WERE NO TRADES.
just excel spreadsheets emailed. No prospectus,no no nothing. THIS WASN'T a public fund remember that friend of a friend thing?
The peoples money was STOLEN from them because they were greedy and looked the other way, thats the way all "confidence" scams work.
I find it really hard to buy the victim BS. If they'd done the due diligence, they wouldn't have lost a dime.
|
First of all the government WAS in it.
A number of complaints were filed by people who knew it was a scheme. They just were not followed up.
Secondly, I'm all for being Devils Advocate, but I saw stories of many people who DID practice due diligence - even accountants, other stockbrokers and economists - and they were taken. Madoff, as you know, sent out false statements. So it was not just spreadsheets, it was false statements.
From that perspective, I guess I have not done due diligence on Vanguard since it is only paper and online "spreadsheets" which shows where all my money is. From that perspective, only gold in the mattress is safe.
I am amazed that people would argue that our society has sunken that far that we cannot believe anyone about anything. It is a sad commentary on the American experience.
For all I know, my house papers are false too. Anyone can make up a couple signatures, a stamp, etc.
I have never been ripped off in that particular way (ponzi), and yes - some schemes are very clear, but since this guy was on the inside (boards of the stock markets, etc.) it is obvious that he had a vast advantage over anyone "normal", even those doing due diligence.
I guess the same point of view would say that if someone mines the street, we all deserve to get blown up because we don't know - like he does - how to avoid the mines or defuse them. Everyone should know that, right?