Bad news for the Obama '12 campaign...

[BentSailor]

Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy

must be one of those " what's your definitions of IS kinda things.

Or perhaps your need to project something to fight about onto others, maybe? Making a snippet bold doesn't change it to mean what you want it to, PDP. To paraphrase a previous poster - there is no "there" there.

[poopdeckpappy]

Originally Posted by Bent ( the spin starts here ) Sailor

Making a snippet bold doesn't change it to mean what you want it to, PDP.

Does this make any difference

Originally Posted by Bent ( the spin starts here ) Sailor

Honestly, Gingrich is easily the sleazier. If everything alleged against Cain is true and we only accept what has multiple eye-witnesses in regards to Gingrich - the way he treated his dying wife still seals the deal for me.

Either way, you lable a guy a sleaze based on false and/or intensional misinfomation, kinda like what you and the rest of the SN libs are doing to Cain

[BentSailor]

Originally Posted by poopdeckpappy

Does this make any difference

No.

Either way, you lable a guy a sleaze based on false and/or intensional misinfomation, kinda like what you and the rest of the SN libs are doing to Cain

Really? There is nothing there, PDP. No false actions because I outlined no actions. No misinformation, because there is no information besides where my opinion stems from. I label him sleazier than Cain - not a sleaze in general. It was a comparison you are free to disagree with if you think Cain is sleazier than Gingrich.

What you are doing is taking my statement and projecting onto it something you can rant about. You know, like taking a statement about someone disliking Obama and then saying it's racist

[ssneade]

Herman Cain leads as top GOP contender, edges out Mitt Romney, but*needs to focus: pundits* - NY Daily News