America's Cup Preview
<HTML><P><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=8></TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width=180><IMG height=301 src="http://www.sailnet.com/images/content/authors/kirby/070902_BK_lead.jpg" width=180><BR><DIV class=captionheader align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>The upcoming edition of the America's Cup is expected to be a very close series as contemporary designs evolve to resemble each other more and more.</B></FONT></DIV></TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2 height=8></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Here we go again! The 2003 America's Cup begins on the waters of the Hauraki Gulf north of Auckland, New Zealand on February 15th, but the elimination races for the nine challengers will start in less than three months on October 1. The winner of this seven-part series takes the Louis Vuitton Cup and then goes up against the New Zealand defenders in a best-of-nine series for the big prize—the America's Cup.</P><P>America's Cup Class yachts are built to a development rule with considerable leeway in the measurement system to allow for different hull shapes, keel and rudder configurations, and rigs. As in the past the big question will be whether designers, engineers, and sailmakers will be able to make any significant improvements over the boats that raced in 2000. That year, New Zealand won the Cup in five straight races from the Italians, who had eliminated 10 other challengers in the Louis Vuitton Challenger Elimination Series before coming up against an invincible Kiwi team. </P><P>To date, most of the nine would-be challengers have launched new boats. The most obvious difference in this year's crop of challengers is that they appear to all be using some form of the "Davidson bow"—the sharply knuckled profile that appeared on both of the 2000 New Zealand boats and was the brainchild of Laurie Davidson. He has since become an American citizen and the chief designer for the One World Challenge syndicate based in Seattle, WA. This configuration makes more efficient use of the AC Rule where it measures the bow overhang, and results in boats with a longer waterline at the same rating as boats with more conventional bows. The boat could have more sail area with the same measured length, as sail area and length are traded off under the rule. </P><P><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=444><IMG height=301 src="http://www.sailnet.com/images/content/authors/kirby/070902_BK_image3.jpg" width=444><BR><DIV class=captionheader align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>The bow of the first boat built for the Swiss Alinghi syndicate is nearly identical to the one on the victorious Kiwi boat from th 2000 America's Cup. </B></FONT></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>The Davidson bow on the first boat built for the Swiss challenge seems from a distance to be almost identical to the New Zealand bows of 2000. Helmsman Russell Coutts and much of the afterguard of Switzerland's Alinghi Challenge made up the nucleus of the Kiwi crew who won the Cup from the San Diego Yacht Club in 1995 and successfully defended it off Auckland in 2000. This foundation of New Zealanders has been with the Swiss team for two years now.</P><P>As well as building two new boats, the Swiss also own Be Happy, the boat that sported fore and aft rudders during the 2000 series and showed flashes of speed, but was subject to breakdowns and was difficult to get into the groove. She has been given a conventional underbody and has a pronounced knuckle at the forward measurement point. </P><P>The boats representing Oracle Challenge from San Francisco, designed by the Bruce Farr office in Annapolis, MD, are sporting the new bow, but the knuckle is not as extreme as on the 2000 New Zealand boats. And of course Davidson himself has put his bow on the Seattle challenge's boats, which are now working out in Auckland. </P><P><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=10 width=160 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD><IMG height=2 alt="" src="http://www.sailnet.com/images/content/authors/bullets/black_1pix.gif" width=160 border=0></TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle width=160><FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans serif" color=black size=+1><B><I>"Computers, test tanks, and the ocean have all confirmed that narrow is fast when it comes to IACC hull design."</I></B></FONT></TD></TR><TR><TD><IMG height=2 alt="" src="http://www.sailnet.com/images/content/authors/bullets/black_1pix.gif" width=160 border=0></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Over the past three editions of the Americas's Cup, computers, test tanks, and the ocean have all confirmed that narrow is fast when it comes to IACC hull design. In 1992 the America Cubed design team, led by Doug Peterson, came up with hulls that were narrower than their competition, and this syndicate owned the fastest boat. In 1995, Team New Zealand's designers, Laurie Davidson and the same Doug Peterson, stunned the yachting world with the narrow, round-hulled NZL 32 and 39, which proved virtually unbeatable off San Diego. Using No. 32 the Kiwis swept the series against Dennis Conner's defender and took the Cup down to Auckland, where it remains today.</P><P>By 2000 most designers were onto the "narrow is fast" theory and the boats that did battle in the frequently rough N.Z. waters were all at least as narrow as the 1995 Kiwi pair. In fact some of them were so narrow that the jib sheeting angle—even with the sheet track right on the deck edge—was was too fine when the wind rose or if the boat had to crack off for several minutes due to one of the big wind shifts prevalent on the Hauraki Gulf. The jib-sheeting angle is the angle between the center line of the boat and a line drawn from the jib tack to the sheeting point. These angles were getting down near the six degree range, which is very fine even by America's Cup Class standards.</P><P>This year, although designers want the boats to be narrow on the waterline and above the water in the forward sections, most seem to have opted for just a hair more beam amidships where the jib sheet tracks are. With this increased beam it will be possible to sheet jibs at between six and eight degrees.</P><P><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=8></TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width=237><IMG height=301 src="http://www.sailnet.com/images/content/authors/kirby/070902_BK_kiwiboats.jpg" width=237><BR><DIV class=captionheader align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>NZ 60, seen sparring with NZ 57 above, has reportedly been fitted with a forward rudder as an experiment by the Kiwi team. </B></FONT></DIV></TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2 height=8></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Since the late Tom Blackaller's 12-Meter <I>USA</I> showed great bursts of upwind speed during the 1987 challenger eliminations off Fremantle while sporting rudders both aft and forward of the keel, designers have experimented with fore and aft rudders. And this time around the defending New Zealanders have spent a lot of time and effort to prove or disprove the front end rudder steering system. NZL 57, the sister ship of 2000 defender NZL 60, has been fitted with the forward appendage and has had its rig moved forward to compensate for the change in lateral plane. Similar experiments have taken place with the Prada team, although it is believed the Italians have not yet advanced down this road as far as the Kiwis have.</P><P>The AC rule dictates that there can be only two moveable appendages under water. These can be in the form of a rudder or rudders, and a trim tab on the keel. The normal configuration is a trim tab and an aft rudder. If the boat is to have rudders both fore and aft, it cannot have a trim tab on the keel. It appears that no design group has yet tried to control their boat with a rudder forward, a tab on the keel, and no aft rudder. </P><P>Although there can be small advantages to the forward appendage under some conditions it is not easy to control a boat with this steering system. Designers and crews are faced with the choice of minor benefit with the likelihood of creating maneuvering problems. During their 5-0 win over Italy's Prada challenge in 2000 the home team demonstrated an ability to maneuver their 80-foot sloop as though it were a two man dinghy. Team Prada's helmsman Francesco de Angelis said after the fourth race that he had no idea an America's Cup boat could be sailed like that. The ability to stop the boat dead, then accelerate to full speed quickly, to turn it in its own length and to make it back up when convenient, played a major role in New Zealand's superb starting strategy. Any advantage gained by a forward rudder would have to be considerable for a team to give up this kind of maneuverability. Time might better be spent learning how to handle the boats like the Kiwis did in 2000, and even trying to improve on that.</P><P><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=8></TD><TD vAlign=top align=left width=350><IMG height=301 src="http://www.sailnet.com/images/content/authors/kirby/070902_BK_image4.jpg" width=350><BR><DIV class=captionheader align=left><FONT color=#000000><B>The French syndicate's newest boat, above, has a pronounced bow knuckle, which serves as a fitting complement to the vessel's remarkable hull color.</B></FONT></DIV></TD></TR><TR><TD colSpan=2 height=8></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>On the other hand, with three months remaining until the beginning of the Louis Vuitton series for the challengers, and eight months before the defending Kiwis have to race the official challenger, it appears possible that a crew could actually develop techniques using the forward appendage that would make the boat even more of a match-race weapon than conventional boats. That remains to be seen.</P><P>Another feature developed by New Zealand in 2000 was the three-spreader mast with diamond shrouds. This spar system created less windage than other America's Cup masts and versions of it are now appearing on most of the 2002-03 crop of boats.<BR><BR>The superiority of the New Zealand boats in both 1995 and 2000 was so marked that they have served as benchmarks for the subsequent challenges. This time the man who was either responsible for or who played a major roll in the Kiwi breakthroughs of the past has jumped ship and is leading Craig McCaw's Seattle effort. Time will tell if Laurie Davidson left behind enough design talent to keep New Zealand ahead of the rest of the world. <BR><BR><HR align=center width="75%"><P></P><P clear=all><P><BR><STRONG>Suggested Reading:</STRONG></P><P><STRONG><A class=articlelink href="http://www.sailnet.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=20610"><STRONG>America's Cup Design Retrospective</STRONG></A><A href="http://www.sailnet.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=20610"><STRONG> </STRONG></STRONG></A><STRONG>by Bruce Kirby<BR><BR></STRONG><A class=articlelink href="http://www.sailnet.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=20630"><STRONG>IACC Boats Unveiled</STRONG></A><STRONG> by Bruce Kirby<BR><BR></STRONG><A class=articlelink href="http://www.sailnet.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=20582"><STRONG>The Defenders</STRONG></A><STRONG> by Bruce Kirby</STRONG></P><P><STRONG>SailNet Store Section: <A class=articlelink href="http://www.sailnet.com/store/departments.cfm?id=344">Sailing Skill Videos</A></STRONG></P></HTML>
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM.|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012