Masthead versus Fractional - Page 3 - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > Out There > Racing
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #21  
Old 08-28-2010
smackdaddy's Avatar
Last Man Standing
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,951
Thanks: 80
Thanked 72 Times in 66 Posts
Rep Power: 8
smackdaddy is a jewel in the rough smackdaddy is a jewel in the rough smackdaddy is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruisingdad View Post
I can talk more about this tomorrow hopefully, but we had a Tiger and a Melges with a Asym that KICKED OUT BUTTS! Very light air, but shifty, which made the Asym awesome. It was a masthead. Manhy of teh racers were saying that fractional was a thing of the past. Me, I just lusted after the Melges...

But good food for thought and makes a good discussion.

B
I had a run on a Melges a couple of months ago. Flew the kite (and trimmed for a bit) in 20+. HAD A BLAST! That was a damn fun boat.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

S/V Dawn Treader - 1989 Hunter Legend 40
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #22  
Old 08-30-2010
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 235
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 5
COOL is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by puddinlegs View Post
f

Fractional boats don't fly genoas from the masthead... they're typically not designed for the load going to weather. On the other hand, some can carry a masthead spinnaker and something like a Code O within certain wind ranges. But even that depends on the particulars of the rig design.
Actually, many modern Offshore race boats do fly masthead genoas
from frac rigs. They function very much in the manner of a upwind
Code Zero, but with subtle differences. A Code Zero must measure
as a Spinnaker, therefore the midgirth must be at least 75% of the
foot length. This makes it difficult to design an extremely efficient
close winded sail. While it will incur a rating penalty, a masthead
genoa can be a very effective light air sail on a boat that
otherwise carries non overlapping frac rigged headsails.
__________________
Islander 30 II 'COOL'
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #23  
Old 09-01-2010
paulk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CT/ Long Island Sound
Posts: 2,533
Thanks: 4
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 15
paulk is on a distinguished road
I seem to remember reading somewhere (CA Markaj?) that fractional rigs create a better or more effective vortex for their size than masthead rigs. It seems their overall shape with the leading edges of the forestay and then mast more closely resembles the curve of the vortex you want to create in order to move the boat upwind. Downwind... it's another story. I keep toying with the idea of putting a masthead chute on our boat. Maybe I can borrow one from a Swan 48 and see if it works.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #24  
Old 09-02-2010
blt2ski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,660
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Rep Power: 10
blt2ski will become famous soon enough
Paul,

A couple of boats in my YC, a Farr 1020, and a hotfoot 32? might be a 30, anyway, they have gone to a mast head spin, gained lots of speed down wind, penalty was not enough to make them non competitive, along with they now use the smaller fractional kite in upper winds to there advantage too.

Marty
__________________
She drives me boat,
I drives me dinghy!
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #25  
Old 09-05-2010
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeorgeB View Post
...Fractional boats allow for jibs to be sheeted closer to the centerline giving the boat more pointing ability. ...
George,

That's one point that strikes me as not necessarily correct. In general, I'd say the opposite.

The truncated foretriangle of a fractional rig usually makes achieving tight sheeting angles trickier. Whereas, generally speaking a longer foretriangle shrinks the acute angle between the centerline of the boat and the imaginary line from the tack to the sheet leads.

There are ways to work around this, but in general I'd say the masthead rig has the advantage here -- simply due to the geometry of the foretriangle.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #26  
Old 11-11-2010
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
LeftCoast is on a distinguished road
I've not heard an argument yet that really convinces me that a fractional is better than a mast head.

The two I hear most..

A) You can bend the mast to depower the sailplan. - The J35 is a masthead rig, and the mast bends wonderfully for depowering the sailplan.

B) Masthead rigs need large overlapping jibs to work. - Thats not because they are masthead rigs, that's just how they were designed. You could just as easily design the boat for small non-overlapping jibs and just run the forestay to the top of the mast.

As for chutes.. Seems no one wants them anywhere but at the top of the mast now.

-jim lee
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #27  
Old 11-12-2010
Faster's Avatar
Just another Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 14,604
Thanks: 67
Thanked 178 Times in 174 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about Faster has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoast View Post
I've not heard an argument yet that really convinces me that a fractional is better than a mast head.

The two I hear most..

A) You can bend the mast to depower the sailplan. - The J35 is a masthead rig, and the mast bends wonderfully for depowering the sailplan.

B) Masthead rigs need large overlapping jibs to work. - Thats not because they are masthead rigs, that's just how they were designed. You could just as easily design the boat for small non-overlapping jibs and just run the forestay to the top of the mast.

As for chutes.. Seems no one wants them anywhere but at the top of the mast now.

-jim lee
What you've said is true, of course, though the masthead kite issue is primarily a racing one. And in the J35, the rig is not exactly the same section and the controls are more involved than the typical run-of-the mill masthead cruiser-racer.

What I like about the frac rig is that jibs, genoas and standard hoist kites are smaller, lighter loaded and easier to tack, gybe and winch in than a masthead for a given sized boat. Not an issue until you get up into the 30+ footers, I suppose, but while I do find our 3/4 rig a tad underpowered at times, I like that the boat handles like 30 and lives like 35....
__________________
Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #28  
Old 11-12-2010
RichH's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,757
Thanks: 9
Thanked 64 Times in 57 Posts
Rep Power: 15
RichH will become famous soon enough
The simple answer (from the mind of a fluid dynamicist) is: fractional boats are more efficient aerodynamically when close hauled .... AND with a masthead spinnaker are ~equal to the SA of a downwind masthead rig.

Large overlapping headsails are simply aero-inefficient ... as most of the 'suction peak' due to aerodynamic flow is near the luff of a headsail. Extreme overlapping headsails retard the 'dumping velocity' or 'reposition it' too far aft of the point of max. draft in the main and thus decrease the aero-efficiency (circulation flow) of the interaction of the 2 sails.

The fract rigs. (with mast head spinns) for *windward-leeward racing* are simply 'more optimized'.
If races were limited to *close reach or below* .... you'd all would be frantically selling/touting masthead boats.
Long distance cruisers try to avoid 'beating' and thats why cruisers prefer non-frac. boats. - the benefit of larger SA when 'off the wind' and not having the *almost-requirement* of needing to use a spinn. when going 'down'. Nothing is worse than going 'down' on frac. boat with NO spinn flying.

Last edited by RichH; 11-12-2010 at 09:31 AM.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #29  
Old 11-12-2010
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
LeftCoast is on a distinguished road
Wait a sec..

RichH : "The simple answer (from the mind of a fluid dynamicist) is: fractional boats are more efficient aerodynamically when close hauled ."

Why? I don't understand why this is.

and..

"Large overlapping headsails"

What my question was that -if- the boat was designed to use non-overlapping sails, then why not just run the headstay to the top of the mast?

I don't see why running the headstay to the top of the mast could hurt anything.

Sorry, this fractional thing has been a pet peeve of mine for a long time. I went around and around with our designer on it and never got an answer that I was really happy with.

-jim lee
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #30  
Old 11-12-2010
paulk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CT/ Long Island Sound
Posts: 2,533
Thanks: 4
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 15
paulk is on a distinguished road
To get the full answer

you may have to read C.A Marcaj's books on aero and hydrodyanmics. My understanding is that the fractional rig, going upwind, has a better balance of factors that create a spiralling vortex UP, off the mainsail, than a masthead rig does. This enables a fractional rig to have better (more?) airflow over the sails than a comparable masthead rig, would, so the fractional rig therefore goes faster. In a masthead rig, the flow in the vortex may get disturbed by the flow from the jib, slowing the overall airflow, and making the masthead rig less efficient. Everything is relative, of course. A 50' masthead rigged boat will probably sail faster upwind than a 20' fractionally rigged boat. Fractional rigs and masthead rigs both work; what's being discussed is their average efficiencies under certain conditions.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012

The SailNet.com store is owned and operated by a company independent of the SailNet.com forum. You are now leaving the SailNet forum. Click OK to continue or Cancel to return to the SailNet forum.