moving support for deck stepped mast - SailNet Community

   Search Sailnet:

 forums  store  


Quick Menu
Forums           
Articles          
Galleries        
Boat Reviews  
Classifieds     
Search SailNet 
Boat Search (new)

Shop the
SailNet Store
Anchor Locker
Boatbuilding & Repair
Charts
Clothing
Electrical
Electronics
Engine
Hatches and Portlights
Interior And Galley
Maintenance
Marine Electronics
Navigation
Other Items
Plumbing and Pumps
Rigging
Safety
Sailing Hardware
Trailer & Watersports
Clearance Items

Advertise Here






Go Back   SailNet Community > On Board > Boat Review and Purchase Forum > Sailboat Design and Construction
 Not a Member? 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 11-30-2009
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
ramminjammin is on a distinguished road
moving support for deck stepped mast

My mast is stepped on the deck, and there is a pole, about 4 by 3 inch, that goes from the cabin floor to the top of the cabin under where the mast is stepped. This pole is directly in the middle of where i want to put a removable bunk and also in the middle of the seating area and is a bit of a nuisance..

How can i find out the correct way to "jackpost" this load ?
I dont want to add any weight if possible.

The layout works well for the two new posts that will carry the load to the floor, to put one post up by the forward bulkhead and the other post back by the transition from gally to main cabin, a span of about 6 ft 6 inches. I would like to use an aluminmum beam or rectangular tube; across the cabin celing to take the mast load to the two jack posts ;as it would save weight.

There is no keel as this is a trimaran and in the bilge the supporting framework looks similar to where the load is now to where the two new places for the load will move.

Thanks for any help .
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #2  
Old 11-30-2009
CalebD's Avatar
Tartan 27' owner
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,503
Thanks: 4
Thanked 83 Times in 76 Posts
Rep Power: 7
CalebD will become famous soon enough
That 'support' piece is called a compression post as it takes the compressive load of the mast an transmits the load to the keel. I am no engineer but I would speculate that what you are thinking about doing will never be quite as stiff and strong as a single compression post located under the foot of your mast as it is now. If it were my boat I would live with the inconvenience of the compression post where it is and try to think of other ways to adapt to it.
JMHO.
__________________
"The cure for anything is salt water~ sweat, tears, or the sea." ~Isak Denesen

Everybody has one:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #3  
Old 11-30-2009
zz4gta's Avatar
I don't discuss my member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chesapeake Bay
Posts: 2,418
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Rep Power: 7
zz4gta is on a distinguished road
There's no way I would move a compression post or sail a boat that had it's post 'relocated'.
__________________
Merit 25 # 764 "Audrey"
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #4  
Old 11-30-2009
Jeff_H's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,524
Thanks: 5
Thanked 85 Times in 65 Posts
Rep Power: 10
Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about Jeff_H has a spectacular aura about
6'-6" is a very long span for a beam supporting a mast. Typically beams supporting a mast would be no longer than a width of a passageway opening (2'-4" at max). On my 38 foot boat my mast comes down on a welded aluminum beam. It is 6" deep by 8 wide made from 5/16 plate. That beam only spans about 14" -16" clear.

You would be way ahead of the game to try to span across the boat to the hull, (rather than longitudinallly) which on a trimarran would typically be a much smaller span. If I had to tackle this I would ideally build a pair of ring frames which would transmit the loads to all sides. If it were me, I would probably build them out of fiberglass in order to get a sufficient bond to be able to transmit the loads into the hull and deck. I would also use a high modulus material like carbon fiber or kevlar for the bottom flange of the beam as a way to minimize deflection.

Normally, masts on Trimarrans come down on one of the cross beams (aka) that tie the hulls together allowing all of the transverse and bending loads to be taken by the beams rather than transmitted through the hulls to the beam.

Jeff
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay and part-time purveyor of marine supplies
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #5  
Old 11-30-2009
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Rep Power: 10
JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough JohnRPollard is a jewel in the rough
Here's an example of an off-set compression post, in case it might give you some ideas:

Pacific Seacraft Flicka Interior
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

NEVER CALLS CRUISINGDAD BACK....CAN"T TAKE THE ACCENT
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #6  
Old 11-30-2009
paulk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: CT/ Long Island Sound
Posts: 2,533
Thanks: 4
Thanked 20 Times in 19 Posts
Rep Power: 15
paulk is on a distinguished road
The Flicka's "offset compression post" looks more like a convenient handhold that was stuck on after the real compression loads were dealt with by the cabintop arch that is so evident in the photo. Engineers with licenses that they could lose if they got it wrong probably figured out how big the arch needed to be and what it should be made of. A mast resting on a 6' I-beam sounds like a house of cards waiting to be knocked over.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #7  
Old 12-01-2009
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
ramminjammin is on a distinguished road
thanks for the replies
yes going across would be better idea
sounds like not moving it is best
but if i ever have an engineer friend onboard will get some free advice

the guy that designed the boat put it in that awkward position for a reason i guess

thanks again
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #8  
Old 12-02-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 515
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11
merc2dogs is on a distinguished road
Often an awkward position is chosen for production reasons, not because it is the best or most usable design. Much quicker and cheaper all around to throw a simple post in directly under the mast than to install an arch and it's supporting structures. Look at different boats by the same manufacturer, see what they have inside. Many manufacturers make changes during production, or have optional interior layouts on the same boat. And many have different models that share the same hull. For example, the Ariel and Commander by Pearson use the same hull. The Ariel has a bulkhead and beam, while the commander has a compression post. Either could be modified to use the other type of construction with no loss of strength. Ken.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #9  
Old 12-02-2009
tager's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 6
tager is on a distinguished road
It is definitely possible to move the post. It is unlikely that you will find a solution that does not increase the mass of your boat, eliminating the post will most likely make your boat heavier. If you have access to titanium I-Beam, you might be able to keep the weight down, but it will be extremely expensive. Aluminum I-beam will not actually be much lighter than steel in this application. Steel is stronger than aluminum. Aluminum is great for some things. It is easier to machine, cheaper, and lighter than steel, but it is definitely weaker than steel. An aluminum beam designed for this job will be bulkier and likely the same weight or heavier than a steel beam. This is why I suggested Ti. Ti will result in the lightest, smallest beam that will do the job and have plenty of extra strength.

Not moving the post is my preferred solution. Another possibility is to build a special post. One that begins and ends in the same place as the existing one, but arches like a dutch boom, or splits in two and rejoins itself later in the bilge. It is advisable to make this post either extremely overbuilt, or hire an engineer to make sure it is of sufficient stiffness and strength.

The new solution will need to be sized for stiffness, not strength. That means it will have to be larger than it would be if sized for strength. Use a stiff material, fiberglass or other polymers would probably be the worst choice.

In short, just leave the post where it is.
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
  #10  
Old 12-02-2009
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 7
ramminjammin is on a distinguished road
chrome moly steel might be good, light and rigid

I will be refitting the boat over the next two years
And hope to spend some months each winter living aboard in the caribbean once i retire

maybe the beam could be temporalily relocated if we were at anchor for a week or two , no sailing , then when it was time to move ,re - insert the direct connected compression post.

wonder what the stress is on that compression post between: no sails no wind and full sails with 30 knots wind ?

thanks
peter
Reply With Quote Share with Facebook
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

 
Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deck vs. Keel Stepped Masts Envirella Gear & Maintenance 10 11-29-2009 11:06 AM
Deck stepped Mast-Always Bad ? Mrs Mutiny Boat Review and Purchase Forum 24 10-05-2009 07:55 PM
30ft Catalina BigRuss Boat Review and Purchase Forum 3 09-09-2006 05:33 PM
what mast? jrwright Boat Review and Purchase Forum 3 03-14-2004 08:19 PM
Is one better than the other? gandydancer Gear & Maintenance 7 07-11-2002 06:08 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Add to My Yahoo!         
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
(c) Marine.com LLC 2000-2012