
03-14-2010
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,498
Rep Power: 6
|
|
|
In terms of safety, a fast boat will get you to safe harbour quicker and make long passages shorter. This is great when crossing oceans where weather can catch up to you.
In the Caribbean, the longest passage is just over 70nm, so begin able to go 8 instead of 5 knots makes a difference of just over 5 hours sailing time, well within the range of weather forecasting.
Compare that to a passage of 1000nm between islands in the South Pacific where that same speed difference results in over 3 days separation between the fast and slower boat. Not only is the slower boat at sea longer and thus more likely to encounter adverse weather, but is most likely hard pressed to outrun a storm as well.
There is a big difference between island hopping in the Caribbean where speed is more a matter of comfort vs. ocean crossing in the South Pacific. That being said, I opted for a bigger boat not because I needed the space but because I wanted more LWL to make passages faster and thus safer. My thinking was that, even in the pacific, satellite weather forecasting is sufficient to give at least 3 days warning of a storm large enough to be worrisome and that ought to suffice to sail/motor out of harms way, assuming 6 knots while 5 knots or below might not be enough speed.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|