
10-26-2010
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,110
Rep Power: 8
|
|
|
I've spent a lot of hours on an I28 and despite working in the bilge a number of times, just don't remember what the bottom of it was. I don't remember a 1/2" steel plate thought and that's the kind of thing that would stick in my mind. Could be something a PO did. I would think that "sealing" the iron plate in could be a very bad thing, because it would allow corrosion to form someplace where you can no longer see it. I wouldn't want to do that.
I'd rather cover the plate, by heating it up and pouring bee's wax over it, so that it was "sealed" but also readily accessible by removing the bees wax. Or using a cold-zinc galvanizing paint, then topping that with a nice white epoxy or urethane paint. (Clean, white, shiny, dry, all good things to see in a bilge.)
Or, just leave it as it is, and try to find out whether that plate was original or why it is there. I think the on-again-off-again I28 web site is back up on a new host, there are certainly sister ships out there because these boats were built VERY solidly.
Compared to most other boats in this size, the I28 already has a massively overbuilt keel attachment. Lots of generous bolts, closely spaced, and a wide strong stub to carry them.
OTOH, the support for the base of the mast is known to be a problem. There's a "bridge" over two ribs that conceals the foremost keel bolt, which supports the aft corner of the head compartment, which is a 4x4(?) teak post, that carries the load of that funny offset compression post. In Bob Perry's original drawings, there's a straight real compression post/mast. The builders probably shifted this to "open up" the interior, but if that bridge in the keel has gotten damp and started to decay--there's a lot of work to access and replace it. Which you'd want to do if you're really going to uncover the entire keel in the bilge anyway.
|