Hull Rocker - SailNet Community
 2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 Old 09-26-2011 Thread Starter
Senior Moment Member
 
SloopJonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 11,326
Thanks: 59
Thanked 65 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Hull Rocker

I'm curious to know what effect hull rocker or lack of it has on the motion or ride comfort of a boat. Does it have an effect on slamming in waves? I understand it will affect the boats CP and thus speed potential at different wind speeds, I'm just curious about its effect "on deck" so to speak.

Anybody ? Bob Perry?

I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
SloopJonB is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 23 Old 09-26-2011
grumpy old man
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,950
Thanks: 1
Thanked 91 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
JonB:
Yes, I think slamming and pounding have everything to do with rocker and very little to do with sectional shapes in the bow.

The lighter the boat the less rocker it will have and the more it will pound. ULDB's have very little rocker if any and they pound. It's also a fucntion of boat speed. Light bpoats are fast and they pound.

I think the only time the actual sectional shape of the bow may have an effect on pounding is if you are motoring dead into waves. Once you heel the boat over the V sections are not doing you any good at all.

I don't think you can connect rocker with Cp. I know what you are thinking but you have to think in three dimensions. You can have a low Cp boat with very little rocker. My own 65' ICON would be a good example of that.
bobperry is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #3 of 23 Old 09-26-2011
Once known as Hartley18
 
Classic30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 4,757
Thanks: 44
Thanked 64 Times in 64 Posts
Rep Power: 9
   
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobperry View Post
JonB:
Yes, I think slamming and pounding have everything to do with rocker and very little to do with sectional shapes in the bow.

The lighter the boat the less rocker it will have and the more it will pound. ULDB's have very little rocker if any and they pound. It's also a fucntion of boat speed. Light bpoats are fast and they pound.

I think the only time the actual sectional shape of the bow may have an effect on pounding is if you are motoring dead into waves. Once you heel the boat over the V sections are not doing you any good at all.
Bob, could you perhaps expand on this a bit? I can understand the "light boats pounding" part but not the "sectional shapes having little to do with it". Perhaps you were meaning for light-displacement boats only??

eg. here's the sections for a typical heavy displacement boat and at, say, 25degs angle of heel, the v sections are still not "flat"?..

Hull Rocker-sections.jpg

Thanks.

-
"Honestly, I don't know why seamen persist in getting wrecked in some of the outlandish places they do, when they can do it in a nice place like Fiji." -- John Caldwell, "Desperate Voyage"

Last edited by Classic30; 09-26-2011 at 11:20 PM.
Classic30 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #4 of 23 Old 09-26-2011
grumpy old man
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,950
Thanks: 1
Thanked 91 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Hart:
Heavy boats almost always have lots of rocker. Your example will have lots of rocker and a deep forefoot with very little to distinguish the forefoot from the leading edge of the keel. Your example will not be a fast boat to weather. Your example will not be a pounder under most conditions. Of course the wrong wave at the right time can make just about any boat pound. But your example by design I would think should not be a pounder.

This is far better shown when combined with a profile view.
Classic30 likes this.
bobperry is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #5 of 23 Old 09-26-2011 Thread Starter
Senior Moment Member
 
SloopJonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 11,326
Thanks: 59
Thanked 65 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobperry View Post
JonB:
Yes, I think slamming and pounding have everything to do with rocker and very little to do with sectional shapes in the bow.

The lighter the boat the less rocker it will have and the more it will pound. ULDB's have very little rocker if any and they pound. It's also a fucntion of boat speed. Light bpoats are fast and they pound.

I think the only time the actual sectional shape of the bow may have an effect on pounding is if you are motoring dead into waves. Once you heel the boat over the V sections are not doing you any good at all.

I don't think you can connect rocker with Cp. I know what you are thinking but you have to think in three dimensions. You can have a low Cp boat with very little rocker. My own 65' ICON would be a good example of that.
Thanks Bob I had a feeling they would ride better but I don't fully understand the last paragraph - I was thinking in 3D (I thought) - thinking back to the design shift in the 70's, where the "Peterson" bow came in - the displacement was pushed into the ends and the mid-body was flattened out - less rocker - did that not INCREASE the CP compared to the earlier, less flat bottomed boats with the Disp. more centralized and more rocker?

I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
SloopJonB is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #6 of 23 Old 09-27-2011
grumpy old man
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,950
Thanks: 1
Thanked 91 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
No. There have always been high and low Cp boats. The "Peterson bow" was no different from the Carter bow, the Holland bow or the S&S bow of the day. It had nothing to do with Cp and everything to do with girth differences. But due to the IOR's weighting of the forward depth measurements rocker was diminished. At the Carter office we called it the "clipper" profile referring to the rockerless profile of the old clipper ships.

Now, to your example, the old wineglass section hull. The calculation of Cp in that hull depended upon where the the designer said the hull ended and the keel began. It's not so obvious in this example compared to a modern fin keel boat.The question was: Do you include the keel in the Cp calc or do you not include it? But as long as the designer was consistant in determining how he would calculate Cp there was no problem.

Go sit by an entrance to a harbor where there are some steep waves building up. Watch the boats come and go. Note that boats with less rocker when they "buck" will pull a far greater amount of the hull out of the water than boats, say like a Westsail 32, will. Then the rockerless boat will slam the entire forward end of the boat back in all at once, pounding. The boat with lts of rocker will ease the hull back into the water and not pound.

That's about the best I can do without sitting down and drawing illustrations as explanations.

I hate to generalize but here I go: Heavy boats have more rocker and they resist pounding. Light boats have less rocker and they pound. Generally.

I hope that helps.
SloopJonB likes this.
bobperry is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #7 of 23 Old 09-27-2011 Thread Starter
Senior Moment Member
 
SloopJonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 11,326
Thanks: 59
Thanked 65 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobperry View Post
No. There have always been high and low Cp boats. The "Peterson bow" was no different from the Carter bow, the Holland bow or the S&S bow of the day. It had nothing to do with Cp and everything to do with girth differences. But due to the IOR's weighting of the forward depth measurements rocker was diminished. At the Carter office we called it the "clipper" profile referring to the rockerless profile of the old clipper ships.

Now, to your example, the old wineglass section hull. The calculation of Cp in that hull depended upon where the the designer said the hull ended and the keel began. It's not so obvious in this example compared to a modern fin keel boat.The question was: Do you include the keel in the Cp calc or do you not include it? But as long as the designer was consistant in determining how he would calculate Cp there was no problem.

Go sit by an entrance to a harbor where there are some steep waves building up. Watch the boats come and go. Note that boats with less rocker when they "buck" will pull a far greater amount of the hull out of the water than boats, say like a Westsail 32, will. Then the rockerless boat will slam the entire forward end of the boat back in all at once, pounding. The boat with lts of rocker will ease the hull back into the water and not pound.

That's about the best I can do without sitting down and drawing illustrations as explanations.

I hate to generalize but here I go: Heavy boats have more rocker and they resist pounding. Light boats have less rocker and they pound. Generally.

I hope that helps.
Got it. That's exactly how I expected it would be. I'm going to have to pull out my design books and study CP again - I seem to have missed something in that area.

Thanks.

I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
SloopJonB is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #8 of 23 Old 09-27-2011
grumpy old man
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,950
Thanks: 1
Thanked 91 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Jon:
Cp, i.e. prismatic coeficient is just a measurement of volume in the ends compared to the volume in the middle. That's the simple way of looking at it.
It has the problem of lumping both ends into one so you can have a fine bow and a full stern and have a "normal" Cp. Or vice versa. But none of these numbers tell you much unless you have an extensive, tried and proven data bank of examples. I think trying to combine Cp with a boat's tendancy to pound is a stretch. Cp is not dependant on rocker. Rocker is two dimensional.
bobperry is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #9 of 23 Old 09-27-2011
PCP
Senior Member
 
PCP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal, West Coast
Posts: 16,195
Thanks: 21
Thanked 102 Times in 85 Posts
Rep Power: 11
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobperry View Post
JonB:
Yes, I think slamming and pounding have everything to do with rocker and very little to do with sectional shapes in the bow.

...
Hi!,

You mean that a mono hull from the last Americas cup that was raced in monohulls (that had little rocker) will slam as much as a Open 60 boat, that also has little rocker?

There is no doubt that a boat with more rocker will slam less but will also not pitch a lot more?

Regards

Paulo
PCP is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #10 of 23 Old 09-27-2011
grumpy old man
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,950
Thanks: 1
Thanked 91 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Paulo:
Yes, I think you are correct. Light boats wih minimal rocker are not usually inclined to pitch while heavy boats with lots of rocker and the ends loaded with gear can pitch a lot.

I think the open 60 would slam more than the old AC boat. I don't think those AC monos were all that light compared to open 60's and the AC boats had more rocker.
bobperry is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Through Hull HorizonHunter General Discussion (sailing related) 8 09-17-2009 03:40 AM
Hull ID vs. hull number bristol321 Bristol 8 03-17-2008 09:01 PM
Multi-Hull vs Mono-Hull Sailboats? terryjoe Boat Review and Purchase Forum 8 11-11-2007 10:45 AM
Do you paint over thru hull bronze nipples on hull saurav16 Gear & Maintenance 4 08-19-2007 06:15 PM
New Thru Hull 1970Columbia34 Columbia & Coronado 1 02-25-2007 05:36 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome