Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat - Page 29 - SailNet Community
 245Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #281 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013
Senior Member
 
wolfenzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: S/V Waltzing Matilda, Port Ludlow, WA (NW Puget Sound)
Posts: 497
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

I never said I had 183 degrees AVS, I simply used that as an example of how unreliable the AVS calculator was. I have nothing against modern yacht design other than taking improvements in performance and design, then tweaking them to be feasible for a cruising boat loosing both the improvements and putting them in an application where it wouldn't make a difference anyway. I was also defending an boat that even though it is of an old design it performs very well (albeit with updated changes to the rig and sail plan).
Sometimes I have to exaggerate something to be able to make my point, there is a fine line between that and getting someones nose out of joint.
Bob: you have mentioned how you would improve the boat and I have picked up bits and pieces about what you think. But I never asked you (pride in your modern designs aside) what you think of the hull design, I could go into more detail about the rig, specifics like sail sizes, placement, mast height, camber and rake, etc., the shrouds and where they are attached have alot to do with why the already pre-stressed mast bends the way it does.

Last edited by wolfenzee; 05-16-2013 at 12:54 AM.
wolfenzee is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #282 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: new england
Posts: 2,105
Thanks: 42
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Rep Power: 3
 
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

sorry- just liked the look of the boat. didn't mean to make trouble. seems like it would be a really neat boat with a market on the east coast and elsewhere. Jeff seems like you. one of those people who has the science of a NA but sails enough to know what makes a old fart like me heart go pitter/patter.

s/v Hippocampus
Outbound 46
outbound is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #283 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013 Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,819
Thanks: 5
Thanked 133 Times in 106 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by outbound View Post
Jeff- really like what you did for "your boat" ? What are the mechanics of the lifting keel? ?How did you mitigate possible damage from grounding? Have you thought about the interior lay out? ?Why did you go with that shaped bulb? Would you construct in wood epoxy,GRP, cored GRP, cored exotics, metal or what? Feel like a 4 y.o. with to many questions. sorry
OutB:

Thank you for the kind words. As Bob points out these are only a first sketch. That said, I have been thinking about many of these same questions as I have been drafting (and some for many years before that).

The lifting keel is one of those items which I have given a lot of thought to.

I will post more about that at some point, and in order to adequately explain how it works I will need to put together some drawings, but as a broad generally, the dagger board can be raised approximately 2 1/2 feet. The trunk tht it rises into is located beneath a fixed portion of the table an terminates at the top of the table except for a pair pf rectangular components which extend to the cabin top.

The daggerboard and bulb would be constucted in two parts. The upper part (the foil above the ballast) is a stainless steel or monel weldment. The lower part is cast lead.

The weldment would designed so that when the board is in the down position, it will be foil shaped from the top of the lead to a few inches into the trunk. Within the weldment are two rectanglar tubes. These extend from the bottom of the welded foil portion where its meets the lead ballast, through the foil and extend approaximately 4 feet above the foil. They an integral part of the structure of the foil, and they serve to transfer the moment laterally. These tubes slide in slightly larger metal tubes which extend from the deck to the top of the centerboard trunk and which are braced by the main bulkhead forward, and by a large knee aft that is intergral with the dinette settee.

There is also a heavy center spine plate in the weldment, that is oriented fore and aft, and which extends from the leading edge of the daggerboard to its trailing edge. That plate rides on upper and lower- fore and aft rollers mounted within the trunk and which maintain the fore and aft position of the daggerboard. Those rollers are through bolted through large blocks of high density urethane. The urethane blocks are intended to act as shock absorbers in a grounding.

This assembly requires a fairly large rectangular opening. in the bottom for installation and maintenance. The (exposed bottom of the hull) fairing for that opening would be removable heavy neoprene membrane with just a slit in the shape of the board so that the board can ride and fall through it. The fairing would not be waterproof. This is similar to some smaller saildrive ports.

The board would be lifted by a reel winch with a cable run to sheaves that are attached within the end of of the guide tube and sliding tubes. The reel winch would be mounted on the guide tube to isolate the compressive loads. the reel winch would be driven by a hydraulic motor and would be driven by an engine driven hydraulic pump. The thinking is that you would never sail the boat with the board partially raised, and so, by definition would have the engine running if the board is being raised. There would also be a back-up geared drive on the reel winch which would take a winch handle for emergencies or when a full back is sailing with you and gets bored entering a harbor.

If we really wanted to guild the lily, I had also looked at a rack and ratchet (similar to the original design for an elevator emergency brake) that would automatically engage when the load was taken off the cables and lock the board down. Os when fully lowed the cable would slack enough that ratchet pawl would engage the rack, or in a knock down, if the board tried to slide into the trunk cable would slacken and the ratchet would also engage locking the daggerboard where it is. Otherwise, the cheap solution is that there would be a simple pin inserted in the guide tubes to lock it down or up.

What I don't like about this is that there is no bilge sump.

The bulb keel shape while schematic in nature was intended to lower the vertical center of gravity, avoid having a bulb extend beyond the leading edge of the keel to avoid catching things, minimze wetted surface, centering the lead weight beneath the main lifting tube, and acting as an end plate.

We have not gotten around to building materials, but to some extent it depends on whether we think of this as a one off or a production design (now there is a laugh). If this was a one off, and my boat, I would probably do cold molded western red cedar veneers over bed and cove strip planking with vinylester-kevlar/glass outer sheathing laminates for puncture resistance and epoxy glass interior for sealing purposes. If production, I personally would want a vinylester-kevlar/glass laminate, cored with high density foam to the waterline and with uncored glass with tightly spaced internal framing below the waterline.

I have not discussed this with Bob, and so Bob may have much better ideas on all of this.

Needless to say, this is not an inexpensive boat. Or perhaps seen from my perspective, this is the cheapest possible boat...The one that no one actually constructs.

Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay

Last edited by Jeff_H; 05-16-2013 at 06:26 PM.
Jeff_H is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #284 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013 Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,819
Thanks: 5
Thanked 133 Times in 106 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfenzee View Post
You might have kept parts of the side view close to the original esthetics, but by increasing the beam by 24% you screwed up other parts of its esthetics and handling characteristics. Granted according to one persons calculations it might take less time to right from a knockdown, but how often is a boat knocked down...there are many other more important considerations. The wider beam would have more space below for accommodations, but then the cabin could have been done differently with the existing hull, if accommodations had had a higher priority).
Now I understand what you are saying. Not only did the last version get 22% wider, but it also got 28% longer. Maybe I can help put this in perspective for you. At this point I have drawn four different boats.
  • The first was essentually a tracing of the Atkin's Captain Cicero, which I needed as a starting point.
  • The second was intended to be precisely what you asked for, your boat with a more efficient keel.
  • The third is where Bob and I went off the reservation. This design was a conjecture. It was based on the idea that people's expectations for boats have changed and will continue to evolve over time. It was somewhat meant as the answer to a question that you did not ask, but I, with Bobs gracious assistance did ask, namely, What would Wolf's boat look like if were designed today, or more generally, what would a small offshore cruiser look like if built today.
  • The fourth design was intended to be the answer to a question aimed at myself. "What would a 14,000 lb boat designed to be my ideal boat look like?" Wolf, you probably would not like this last version for reasons that neither of us could explain, but she would be the most seaworthy, seakindly, have the most carrying capacity and be the fastest of the bunch. I would love her and take her anywhere.


I here are the four designs for comparison:

Here are the lines for your original boat:
[IMG] photo RedraftedExistingLines_zpsb7698573.jpg[/IMG]

Here is the version with just a fin keel, skeg hung rudder added:
[IMG] photo ProposedLinesdrawings_zps34d69e43.jpg[/IMG]

and an updated rig for that version:
[IMG] photo WolfenzeeProgressLinesandSailPlan4-19-13_Page_2_zps1b185ae2.jpg[/IMG]


Here is the third version, which I am calling a small limited production distance cruiser:
[IMG] photo CompletesetR-35-14-13_Page_1_zpse46dffed.jpg[/IMG]


[IMG] photo CompletesetR-35-14-13_Page_2_zps23b42e6f.jpg[/IMG]

<[IMG] photo CompletesetR-35-14-13_Page_3_zpsd37afe88.jpg[/IMG]


And lastly, here is a first draft of the fourth version, the one that I would like to own for myself:

[IMG] photo MyVersionR-1_Page_1_zpsab4ff185.jpg[/IMG]

<[IMG] photo MyVersionR-1_Page_2_zpse3b34752.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG] photo MyVersionR-1_Page_3_zps27885e73.jpg[/IMG]

Hopefully, this clears up the confusion.

Respectfully,
Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay

Last edited by Jeff_H; 05-16-2013 at 07:44 PM.
Jeff_H is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #285 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013
Senior Moment Member
 
SloopJonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 11,327
Thanks: 59
Thanked 65 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_H View Post
I here are the four designs for comparison:

Here are the lines for your original boat:
[IMG] photo RedraftedExistingLines_zpsb7698573.jpg[/IMG]

Here is the version with just a fin keel, skeg hung rudder added:
[IMG] photo ProposedLinesdrawings_zps34d69e43.jpg[/IMG]

and an updated rig for that version:
[IMG] photo WolfenzeeProgressLinesandSailPlan4-19-13_Page_2_zps1b185ae2.jpg[/IMG]


Here is the third version, which I am calling a small limited production distance cruiser:
[IMG] photo CompletesetR-35-14-13_Page_1_zpse46dffed.jpg[/IMG]


[IMG] photo CompletesetR-35-14-13_Page_2_zps23b42e6f.jpg[/IMG]

<[IMG] photo CompletesetR-35-14-13_Page_3_zpsd37afe88.jpg[/IMG]


And lastly, here is a first draft of the fourth version, the one that I would like to own for myself:

[IMG] photo MyVersionR-1_Page_1_zpsab4ff185.jpg[/IMG]

<[IMG] photo MyVersionR-1_Page_2_zpse3b34752.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG] photo MyVersionR-1_Page_3_zps27885e73.jpg[/IMG]

Hopefully, this clears up the confusion.

Respectfully,
Jeff
Since you (or someone) deleted all the images, it only ADDS to the confusion.

I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.

Last edited by Jeff_H; 05-16-2013 at 08:42 PM. Reason: photo experiment
SloopJonB is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #286 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 16,373
Thanks: 101
Thanked 304 Times in 294 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by SloopJonB View Post
Since you (or someone) deleted all the images, it only ADDS to the confusion.
SJB... I see them.. EDIT.... and now I dont!!???

Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #287 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013 Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,819
Thanks: 5
Thanked 133 Times in 106 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by SloopJonB View Post
Since you (or someone) deleted all the images, it only ADDS to the confusion.
I edited my albums on Photobucket and the images disappeared. They should all be back now. Please let me know if they don't show up on your computer since I see them on my computer.

Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay
Jeff_H is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #288 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013
Senior Moment Member
 
SloopJonB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 11,327
Thanks: 59
Thanked 65 Times in 62 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Nope.

I, myself, personally intend to continue being outspoken and opinionated, intolerant of all fanatics, fools and ignoramuses, deeply suspicious of all those who have "found the answer" and on my bad days, downright rude.
SloopJonB is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #289 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013
Just another Moderator
 
Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 16,373
Thanks: 101
Thanked 304 Times in 294 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

Quote:
Originally Posted by SloopJonB View Post
Nope.
They're back for me...

Ron

1984 Fast/Nicholson 345 "FastForward"

".. there is much you could do at sea with common sense.. and very little you could do without it.."
Capt G E Ericson (from "The Cruel Sea" by Nicholas Monsarrat)
Faster is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #290 of 1155 Old 05-16-2013 Thread Starter
Moderator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 6,819
Thanks: 5
Thanked 133 Times in 106 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Bob Perry's take on Wolfenzee's dream boat

SBS, They should be back...


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay
Jeff_H is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bob Perry's Tragic Loss smackdaddy General Discussion (sailing related) 16 07-09-2013 10:57 AM
What's your dream boat? dovetailnj General Discussion (sailing related) 58 07-08-2013 12:48 PM
What's your dream boat??? DavidB.UK General Discussion (sailing related) 4 06-22-2013 04:06 PM
Perry's new Sunday blog bobperry General Discussion (sailing related) 12 11-07-2011 06:05 PM
A boat dream! pjboots Boat Review and Purchase Forum 28 03-22-2007 03:10 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome