Dangerous Wakes Revisited - Page 3 - SailNet Community
Seamanship & Navigation Forum devoted to seamanship and navigation topics, including paper and electronic charting tools.

 3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #21 of 63 Old 08-01-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 743
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
We all have a story to tell about an outrageous wake. We left a neighboring port one afternoon and were amazed at how the big powerboats jam the throttles forward when they exit the busy no wake zone. A fifty footer digs a heck of a hole in the water and all that water has to go somewhere. After experiencing this nonsense firsthand, we were just a couple miles away from this port when we heard the Coast Guard responding to a call about a 17 foot speedboat being capsized from one of these wakes. We were not surprised.

I've noticed that when these big boats leave the scene of their mayhem, they advertise the name of their boat and their home port in really big letters. I find that very considerate of them. Especially if one of my family members has been thrown across the cabin into the chart table. If there are only 3 marinas in that port that can accommodate a boat of that size, and the marinas are only a half hour drive by car......well, I'm just sayin'.
Siamese is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #22 of 63 Old 08-01-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Send a message via Yahoo to landmineop
The longer this thread runs, the more I am becoming an advocat of flare pistols and paint guns (dayglow green of course).
landmineop is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #23 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
Senior Member
 
OtterGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 161
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
remember that alot of boats produce bigger wake when not on plane. in my experiences alot of those boats will slow down thinking they are doing you a favor but actually make more wake.
OtterGreen is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #24 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
A mod and her dragon
 
DRFerron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,609
Thanks: 105
Thanked 198 Times in 181 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
Dock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulladh View Post
Just wondering, how do you all define a dangerous wake?

I have frequently rode through wakes from both pleasure and commercial craft, sometimes 8ft crest to trough, on the beam, on the bow and in between. Not pleasant but I would not call it dangerous.
The wake is considered an extension of the boat. Whatever damage it does, regardless of the size of the wake, the boat attached to it (and therefore the boat's owner) may be held responsible:

From USCG Navigation Center


"10. What are the regulations concerning wake effects, wake damage, and responsibility? Regarding one's wake, vessels over 1600 Gross Tons are specifically required by Title 33 CFR 164.11 to set the vessel's speed with consideration for...the damage that might be caused by the vessel's wake. Further, there may be State or local laws which specifically address "wake" for the waters in question.

While vessels under 1600 GT are not specifically required to manage their speed in regards to wake, they are still required to operate in a prudent matter which does not endanger life, limb, or property (46 USC 2302). Nor do the Navigation Rules exonerate any vessel from the consequences of neglect (Rule 2), which, among other things, could be unsafe speeds (Rule 6), improper lookout (Rule 5), or completely ignoring your responsibilities as prescribed by the Navigation Rules.

As to whether or not a particular vessel is responsible for the damage it creates is a question of law and fact that is best left to the Courts. For more information, contact your local Marine Patrol or State Boating Law Administrator."

Donna



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Catalina 30 TRBS
DRFerron is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #25 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
DR

Chapter 10 I assume applies to most commercial vessels. The commercial vessels on the Delaware travel at a speed that is probably appropriate for conditions, but the wake just outside the shipping lanes can be dramatic, probably also influenced by change in water depth and shore line condition.

With a few minutes to prepare if I am keeping a watch as I should, turning the boat to receive the wake at about 45deg off the bow is good enough. If i am in the shipping lane and too close to the commercial traffic it is my fault not the fault of the tug or freighter.

Pleasure power boat traffic, if I keep an appropriate watch requires the same adjustment of bow to wake front. Most power boater will slow down but as Otter observed coming off plane can produce a larger wake.

In no wake zones or within a marina big wakes are only produced by big A-holes.

I have experienced many unpleasant wakes but not anything I would call dangerous.

1970 Havsfidra 20 by Fisksatra
On the Delaware River at Fox Grove Marina Essington PA
Ulladh is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #26 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
A mod and her dragon
 
DRFerron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,609
Thanks: 105
Thanked 198 Times in 181 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
Dock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulladh View Post
DR

Chapter 10 I assume applies to most commercial vessels.
The second paragraph, and where I italicized it, applies to smaller vessels.

You're correct about being in the shipping lane. All boaters are responsible for avoiding collisions and damage so if you put yourself in a bad position, some of the fault will be yours.

By "coming off plane" you mean the act of coming down? It seems to me that if a power boater causes a larger wake coming off plane, shouldn't he or she make sure that they've throttled back in plenty of time before it becomes an issue? Maybe that means beginning the no wake leg way before other boats have to but it seems that would be the responsible thing to do. It's also about knowing your boat's characteristics.

I'm still smarting from the power boaters passing us at full speed in the narrow channel heading to St. Michaels, MD. Amazing lack of courtesy.

Donna



To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Catalina 30 TRBS
DRFerron is online now  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #27 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
I have traveled the long narrow channel from Eastern Bay to St. Michaels, not really an option to turn the bow onto a wake without running out of channel.

The shoal waters outside the channel just make for a larger crest to trough.

We blow-boaters are content with getting to our destination eventually but the stink-potters want to get there now. Is there a middle ground?

1970 Havsfidra 20 by Fisksatra
On the Delaware River at Fox Grove Marina Essington PA
Ulladh is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #28 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 185
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 6
 
One thing you can do when you see a powerboat about to overtake you is to slow down to about 2 or 3 knots. If you stay at 6 or 7 knots, you're asking him to be in the low teens to make a pass. Which makes a huge wake. A knowledgeable powerboater, (they exist), will wave a thanks for letting him make a pass at a lower wake speed of around 7 knots.

Most large boats on plane at 30 knots will create less wake than one dragging it's arse in the water at 12, so he may be doing you a favour by blowing by you.

One other thing, and while it's not an excuse, it does point out some frustration that large cruisers may have. Getting up on plane uses a lot of fuel. If a large power boat owner has to do that every 10 minutes, well you can see how frustration mounts.

You might want to google displacement/transition/planing speeds of powerboats. It will give you a good idea of of you can help give a powerboater a decent passing window.

Another thing, monitor 16. While most sailboaters think stinkpotters don't use radios, most cruisers think blowboaters don't either. So someone has to be right.
Ninefingers is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #29 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Suggestion, this weekend stroll over to our power boat neighbors with a six-pack of good beer discuss how we can make each others days on the water more pleasant.
SVAuspicious likes this.

1970 Havsfidra 20 by Fisksatra
On the Delaware River at Fox Grove Marina Essington PA
Ulladh is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #30 of 63 Old 08-02-2011
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Send a message via Yahoo to landmineop
A number of power boat captains I have talked to say that on the ICW they monitor channel 9 and channel 16 offshore while we monitor channel 16 evrywhere. This seems to be part of the problem.
landmineop is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fischer Panda Generators - Dangerous Defects pepepotamo Gear & Maintenance 1 07-09-2004 11:02 AM
Topping lifts revisited PBzeer Gear & Maintenance 2 02-28-2004 04:02 PM
dangerous wakes nauticalrich General Discussion (sailing related) 16 02-03-2002 11:18 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome