What would you do? - Page 2 - SailNet Community
Seamanship & Navigation Forum devoted to seamanship and navigation topics, including paper and electronic charting tools.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #11 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 387
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
In the drawing (not sure about in reality) I don't think he was the burdened vessel, as it was not a crossing situtation. It was a meeting (forget proper term) situation, where both boats are expected to let the other pass on his/ her port side, as they did. Is this not correct. I guess sometimes a meeting situation can turn into a crossing situation, if one/ both alter course because of wind changes, or lack of ability to continue on present course, but that doesn't look like the case here.
Northeaster is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidpm View Post
I agree. But the way I judged it he did not have to alter his course.
We would have cleared by 30'.

So I guess the real question is in a non-race situation how close is OK?
Too close is when risk of collision exists. Is there risk of collision when you have a 30' CPA; especially considering that you have no way of reliably determining the relative rates of leeway of the two vessels? Without a doubt, in my opinion.

You should have fallen off.

Last edited by KurtV; 08-12-2009 at 01:50 PM.
KurtV is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #13 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
NON member
 
AE28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 546
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidpm View Post
I agree. But the way I judged it he did not have to alter his course.
We would have cleared by 30'.

So I guess the real question is in a non-race situation how close is OK?
David - I agree with the "real question", have asked it of myself many times and don't know the answer!!!
Paul

On second thought, it doesn't matter if it's a racing or non-racing situation. It only matters if my Wife is aboard, or not!!!

Last edited by AE28; 08-12-2009 at 11:45 AM. Reason: add afterthought
AE28 is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #14 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
Senior Member
 
Valiente's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,491
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 11
   
Again, in the absence of mitigating weather, tide and current factors, I can't give an informed opinion. Ten knots of breeze and no current would elicit a different answer than 25 knots and an opposing tidal flow. A thirty-foot gap (a "standard boat length") is reasonable in one instance, and about five lengths too close in the other.

Can't sleep? Read my countdown to voyaging blog @
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Valiente is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #15 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 825
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 10
 
The difficulty is although the downwind boat is described as burdened, it is the only one with a boom and described as sailing. The other has a mast but no boom and could very well be motoring as I took it. In which case he should turn to stb not port unless he was well clear.
In racing where one is reasonably sure both skippers are up with the play, one might well be fairly aggressive, in other situations this is far from certain indeed unlikely I am becoming more conservative. It only needs one to become distracted and lurch off course, and even cut across your bows seemingly without seeing you, to learn to assume nothing.
chris_gee is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #16 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
Senior Member
 
CaptainForce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: living aboard since 1972
Posts: 1,715
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
;lots of reasonable and prudent choices posted here. My favorite and my action would probably be the plan described by RichH. 'take care an joy, Aythya crew
CaptainForce is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #17 of 24 Old 08-12-2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_gee View Post
The difficulty is although the downwind boat is described as burdened, it is the only one with a boom and described as sailing. The other has a mast but no boom and could very well be motoring as I took it. In which case he should turn to stb not port unless he was well clear...
Leeward over windward doesn't come into play here. The first priority in rule 12 is that a sailing vessel on a port tack has to keep out of the way of a sailing vessel on a starboard tack. The OP is the give way vessel.
KurtV is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #18 of 24 Old 08-12-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
davidpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison
Posts: 4,044
Thanks: 273
Thanked 62 Times in 53 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by KurtV View Post

You should have fallen off.

I could not fall off as the break-wall was downwind.
My choices were to tack in front of him or turn 180 degrees.

Slowing down might have helped but not much.
davidpm is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #19 of 24 Old 08-12-2009 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
davidpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madison
Posts: 4,044
Thanks: 273
Thanked 62 Times in 53 Posts
Rep Power: 8
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris_gee View Post
The difficulty is although the downwind boat is described as burdened, it is the only one with a boom and described as sailing. The other has a mast but no boom and could very well be motoring as I took it. In which case he should turn to stb not port unless he was well clear.
Both boats were sailing.
davidpm is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #20 of 24 Old 08-13-2009
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidpm View Post
I could not fall off as the break-wall was downwind.
My choices were to tack in front of him or turn 180 degrees.

Slowing down might have helped but not much.
I'm confused by the sketch you provided, then. You said that the other vessel came to port (toward the breakwall) while in the sketch it appears that you had more room in that direction than she did.
KurtV is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome