why was the singlehand/lookout thread closed? - SailNet Community
Seamanship & Navigation Forum devoted to seamanship and navigation topics, including paper and electronic charting tools.

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 Old 04-01-2011 Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,044
Thanks: 8
Thanked 41 Times in 38 Posts
Rep Power: 11
why was the singlehand/lookout thread closed?

The arguments there are by OP and by those responding (yeah, us "bricks") is a discussion well worth having, and continuing, at least in my opinion.

OP, if ever in a collsion at sea (unlikely, but yeah it happens) will find a federal judge in the US, to be a "brick" about Rule 5, too.

Bottom line, if you had a collision, and weren't keeping a visual lookout "at all times", you won't get away without fault. Singlehanders are not an exception to rule 5--any more than would be a tanker crew who was "singlehanding" with no one on the bridge.

Not that I want to be a Moderator, nuh-uh.
nolatom is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 Old 04-01-2011
Senior Member
Maine Sail's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maine Coast
Posts: 6,029
Thanks: 20
Thanked 250 Times in 193 Posts
Rep Power: 16
As a follow up I emailed the USCG and talked to a friend who is an admiralty law attorney. Scraph's original interpretation of the rule was incorrect, for bad or good, but single-handed sailors are not absolved of rule 5 and keeping a look out via sight and eharing:

Here's the response:


Regarding single-handed lookouts, the 'best input' has been provided by the Court(s): "It may seem unfeeling to condemn single handed transatlantic sailors for sleeping at night. But they pursue this hazardous avocation voluntarily, and are not exempt from the requirements of prudent seamanship...[this sailor's] decision to go below during the nighttime was negligent. The obligation to maintain a proper lookout falls upon great vessels and small alike."
--GRANHOLM v. TFL EXPRESS, 576 F.Supp. 435, 1984 A.M.C. 943

We hope this answers your inquiry and we exhort you to always navigate safely,

U.S. Coast Guard
Office of Navigation Systems
Washington, DC 20593-7851

And a brief excerpt from the ruling (Camera was the sailboat and Express the ship):

"The CAMERA's failure to maintain an attentive lookout rises to the level of that of the EXPRESS; indeed, the failure to maintain any lookout at all at night constitutes a more severe degree of neglect. That is sufficient to overcome any advantage which the CAMERA might otherwise enjoy as (1) an overtaken vessel which (2) was under sail."

As I read that the judge gave more weight to the fact that he did not maintain a proper look out than the fact that the ship was over taking and give way to a vessel under sail.

I guess the USCG and US Judges are "bricks" too..

-Maine Sail / CS-36T

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Images In Posts Property of Compass Marine Inc.

Last edited by Maine Sail; 04-01-2011 at 03:01 PM.
Maine Sail is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 04-01-2011
JohnRPollard's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Chesapeake
Posts: 5,680
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Rep Power: 10

We don't always editorialize on why a thread is closed. In this case, it might be helpful and serve as a useful reminder on our standards. However, please don't construe this as an invitation to belabor the point.

While the topic was a fair one -- and one that has been hashed out here many times in the past replete with similar calculations and ROR arguments -- we have neither time nor inclination to repeatedly police threads or individual posts for abusive language or lack of civility. If a thread or poster requires too much "maintenance", we may shut it down or issue warnings or both.

It's that simple.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Pacific Seacraft Crealock 31 #62

JohnRPollard is offline  
Closed Thread

Quick Reply

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
singlehand docent Seamanship & Navigation 9 05-29-2009 11:16 PM
TransPac 2008 Singlehand Stu01 Racing 1 07-22-2008 02:24 AM
Pearson P33 Singlehand modification Archis Gear & Maintenance 14 09-05-2007 09:20 AM
34 to large to singlehand? snider General Discussion (sailing related) 10 06-27-2006 11:56 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome