Rallies Gone Wrong - Page 4 - SailNet Community
 390Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Bristol 45.5 - AiniA
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 5
Thanked 96 Times in 84 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by chucklesR View Post
Just to be clear - if I do a rally it will be one like this one.

White knuckles and BFS 'worthy' are in the eye of the beholder.
Have to disagree with this. The ocean is a constant. The thing that changes is one's confidence that things will turn out OK, ie I will not die after all. Going in a rally does not make it safer, that is only a illusion. If you feel that you would only do a passage on a rally you should not go.

Back home on Lake Ontario after something over 36,000 nm circumnavigator. Not surprisingly there is a lot of stuff I want to get done on Ainia both cosmetically and functionally. Getting an early start so it will be ready to go for next summer (Lake Superior?).
killarney_sailor is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Bristol 45.5 - AiniA
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,852
Thanks: 5
Thanked 96 Times in 84 Posts
Rep Power: 10
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by smackdaddy View Post
I did just notice that NARC has put up on their main page an account of the 2011 fatality and rescues:

THIS IS THE REASON WHY WE ARE ONLY INVITING LARGER BOATS AND EXPERIENCED SAILORS

Much different than booze on a beach.

Good on them.
I would be interested to know which factor - big or experienced, they would consider more important. I assume big since the chance of a weather window lasting means that 170+ days would be most important.

In general the idea of leaving from Newport so late in the season does not appeal to me at all. Your chances of avoiding anything hitting the fan are much better from the Chesapeake.

About any of these passages from the US to the Caribbean in November, the biggest problem is that you are doing a potentially very difficult passage before you have had the chance to develop the experience you need.

Back home on Lake Ontario after something over 36,000 nm circumnavigator. Not surprisingly there is a lot of stuff I want to get done on Ainia both cosmetically and functionally. Getting an early start so it will be ready to go for next summer (Lake Superior?).
killarney_sailor is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #33 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Senior Member
 
manatee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: S.E. Florida
Posts: 1,033
Thanks: 23
Thanked 83 Times in 71 Posts
Rep Power: 3
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

Exxon Valdez
Edmund Fitzgerald
Titanic
Poseidon
Mary Celeste
....and so on.

It's not so much the size of the boat, but the seamanship of the crew.

A 23-foot open boat, 19 men, 3,600 miles:

Bounty's Launch

He may have been "an overbearing, tin-plated dictator with delusions of god-hood" of an S.O.B. of a captain, but William Bligh was a consummate seaman, having trained and served under the greatest navigator of the age, James Cook.
capta likes this.

=====================
*
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
*
=====================
"The skipper should be the calmest person on board. It is good for the morale of those around you. However, if everyone around you is frightened then be aware of the possibility that they know something you donít."

~~Dylan Winter,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

=====================
manatee is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #34 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Mermaid Hunter
 
SVAuspicious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: on the boat - Chesapeake
Posts: 3,984
Thanks: 0
Thanked 158 Times in 141 Posts
Rep Power: 9
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

How many people commenting on this thread have had command on a passage of five days or more without bailouts? Maybe it's more than I think.

As I understand it the only requirement for the Salty Dawg is that you've done a real offshore passage before.

I'm not sure there is better weather forecasting than Salty Dawg provides. It all still comes down to the skipper's responsibility.

We all know from experience that people--skipper and crew--get in over their heads. We all know that sometimes someone on the boat just wants to get off and sometimes that leads to calls for aid. Sometimes it leads to bad decision-making.

We can come up with rules for whether a boat is ready to go offshore. There are lots of existing rules that (mostly) make sense. Who makes the call if a crew is ready to go offshore? Boats outperform crews all the time.

What I see of weather offshore makes me surprised that a boat was dismasted and that a small handful of other boats want to pull the plug. Still, I'm not out there. I don't know what they are seeing, what they missed in prep, what surprises the crew faced.

It is one thing to learn from the experiences and mistakes of others. It is something entirely different to second guess the people on the scene. That way lies armchair sailing.

The Caribbean 1500 left Saturday. Salty Dawg recommended leaving Wednesday. My own analysis led to a recommendation to leave Monday pre-dawn. How things come out in one event isn't really statistically significant. There are two many variables and not enough measurables.

I'm not a rally person. I do think there is a false sense of security associated with rallies. If I sail in one it will be as a delivery skipper and I'll treat it like any other delivery, making my own decisions based on my own best judgment and the best data available to me. That said, I like the Salty Dawg concept and I personally think it is good for the cruising and offshore sailing community.

sail fast and eat well, dave
S/V Auspicious
AuspiciousWorks.com
beware "cut and paste" sailors.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
SVAuspicious is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #35 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Senior Member
 
vtsailguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vermont
Posts: 509
Thanks: 7
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

What's really interesting in the salty dawg and Carib 1500 is that they both left (more or less) the same time, and to be in the Carib you need NO offshore experience. I am not really sure the support is any greater than the salty......


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Three mini-pirates scour the Caribbean Seas with stops for ice cream and legos
Latest blog post:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
vtsailguy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #36 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Last Man Standing
 
smackdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 14,438
Thanks: 149
Thanked 140 Times in 133 Posts
Rep Power: 9
     
Re: Offshore Rescues

Quote:
Originally Posted by PCP View Post
"25 mph, with ocean swells of 5 to 8 feet. "

"The rescued boaters, who reported they were taking on water and were sick"

Four rescued from storm-battered sailboat off Atlantic Coast - U.S. News

What means taking on water? means that the boat was taking some water (that is a normal thing in a storm) or that they had problems and were taking more water than the one they could pump out?

Sick? Meaning seasick, or really sick?

Regards

Paulo
This is actually a very good question. In my research for the article I wrote for Cruising World - the "thin red line" in unabashedly triggering a rescue is "we're taking on water". Being sick or uncomfortable is manageable - taking on water means that the clock is ticking.

But what does that phrase really mean...to the skipper? Does it really mean you're sinking - in relatively immediate danger of dying? I remember in Doug's thread where, in retrospect, he felt that they were not in as much danger as he initially perceived it to be - when later weighed against the very real danger of the actual rescue.

It seems the definition of "taking on water" needs to be very carefully considered by the skipper when a boat's in distress.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

S/V Dawn Treader - 1989 Hunter Legend 40
smackdaddy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #37 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Last Man Standing
 
smackdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 14,438
Thanks: 149
Thanked 140 Times in 133 Posts
Rep Power: 9
     
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by killarney_sailor View Post
have to disagree with this. The ocean is a constant. The thing that changes is one's confidence that things will turn out ok, ie i will not die after all. Going in a rally does not make it safer, that is only a illusion. If you feel that you would only do a passage on a rally you should not go.
+1.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

S/V Dawn Treader - 1989 Hunter Legend 40
smackdaddy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #38 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Over Hill Sailing Club
 
smurphny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Adirondacks NY
Posts: 3,447
Thanks: 86
Thanked 99 Times in 96 Posts
Rep Power: 7
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

What's likely to happen is that the USCG will start requiring permits for all these organized events with minimum safety requirements. It's too bad because more regulation will probably not change the fact that it seems too many folks do not appreciate what can happen and seem to be ignorant of some really basic stuff. You can understand someone getting caught by weather on a long passage but it's hard to fathom why people choose to set sail when waiting is obviously the best choice. Everyone wants to get going but it seems that too many can't resist the urge and throw the dice.

Alberg 35: With a philosophical flourish Cato throws himself upon his sword; I quietly take to the ship.
smurphny is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #39 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
Last Man Standing
 
smackdaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 14,438
Thanks: 149
Thanked 140 Times in 133 Posts
Rep Power: 9
     
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVAuspicious View Post
As I understand it the only requirement for the Salty Dawg is that you've done a real offshore passage before.
But what does "real" mean? Again, why not conduct the rally under ISAF regs?


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

S/V Dawn Treader - 1989 Hunter Legend 40
smackdaddy is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
post #40 of 957 Old 11-08-2013
PCP
Senior Member
 
PCP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Portugal, West Coast
Posts: 16,212
Thanks: 21
Thanked 104 Times in 87 Posts
Rep Power: 11
 
Re: Rallies Gone Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by capta View Post
Perhaps it's time people were charged for this service. I can't even imagine what it costs the taxpayers to send a Hercules or two and a chopper out 275 miles or so because some folks are seasick and scared.
....
I'm guessing it's just too easy to give up and call for a free ride, these days.
I have been saying and many disagreeing that this sort of situations is going to fall on the ones that take or/and are experienced. I bet that on these times of economic difficulties somebody is going to look at the numbers and costs and will stop with this nonsense. It is logical that the ones that benefice from SAR should the ones to pay for it, instead of the money coming from all tax payers.

That can be made trough mandatory insurance that obviously is going to be more expensive than the actual one. That would also auto regulate the boats that should or not go offshore and crew experience. I don't believe the premiums regarding SAR will be the same for all boats and some in what regards offshore would be simply not insurable. A certification that needs sailing experience will also lower premiums. They are not there to lose money.

Regards

Paulo


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by PCP; 11-08-2013 at 02:20 PM.
PCP is offline  
Quote Quick Reply Share with Facebook
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sailing fraternity rallies for gutted Carrickfergus club NewsReader News Feeds 0 06-25-2012 09:20 AM
Smooth sailing for Fish, Sharapova rallies NewsReader News Feeds 0 08-30-2011 10:10 PM
Smooth sailing for Fish, Sharapova rallies NewsReader News Feeds 0 08-30-2011 10:10 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome