SailNet Community - View Single Post - Dismasted/1964 Challenger
View Single Post
post #30 of Old 07-31-2019
Jeff_H
Administrator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 8,876
Thanks: 43
Thanked 439 Times in 369 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Dismasted/1964 Challenger

Several quick points:

If you are going to a slightly fractional with your rig, you will want to go with slightly aft swept spreaders and slightly aft set uppers and lowers. If you sweep the spreader aft you can eliminate the forward lowers and the lowers do not need to be set aft as far as they will need to be if there are forward lowers.

I do want to correct the misstatement above. actually the mainsail can be eased further with swept aft spreaders because the lowers are further forward than they would be with be without fore and aft lowers.

But beyond that, in order to take advantage of the virtues of a fractional rig, simpler rigging and the ability to quickly depower the rig, you either need swept back spreaders, or running backstays.

Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay
Jeff_H is online now  
 
 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome