Beneteau Keel bolts - SailNet Community
 12Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 66 Old 08-27-2018 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Lazerbrains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: On a Boat
Posts: 877
Thanks: 10
Thanked 39 Times in 39 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Beneteau Keel bolts

The keel bolts held. The structure failed.

Just saw this today on Facebook, posted by a salvage operation. This Beneteau apparently hit a reef and sunk in 5 minutes when the keel snapped off. What suprised me in the photos is that it doesn't look like keel bolts failed - instead it looks like the bottom of the boat ripped away with the keel. I would have thought the bolts would pull before the structure itself would fail.
Attached Thumbnails
40276237_10156043559091443_4811740904970780672_n.jpg   40213664_10156043559476443_6071753261575045120_n.jpg   40314839_10156043559431443_9016551820905938944_n.jpg  

Last edited by Lazerbrains; 08-27-2018 at 12:25 PM.
Lazerbrains is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
Senior Member
 
celenoglu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 839
Thanks: 3
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Rep Power: 11
 
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

The safety factor for keel bolts is 7 or more. That means they can carry 7 times the load they are currently carrying. It is generally the body that is broken. You can see many images of keel bolts nearly half gone due to corrosion but still doing their work.
celenoglu is online now  
post #3 of 66 Old 08-27-2018 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Lazerbrains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: On a Boat
Posts: 877
Thanks: 10
Thanked 39 Times in 39 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

Yes, but the bolts held in this case. What failed is the structure they were bolted to.

I probably should have used a different title to the thread.
Lazerbrains is offline  
 
post #4 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
Senior Member
 
JimsCAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glen Cove, NY
Posts: 4,439
Thanks: 5
Thanked 202 Times in 194 Posts
Rep Power: 13
 
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

I agree that it is good engineering to have a large factor of safety in the keel bolts to account for possible corrosion over the years. What I don't think is good engineering is these deep small cross sectional area blade keels with a bulb on the bottom. The forces applied in a grounding are huge and the small hull area that must carry that load is just not enough
Lazerbrains likes this.

S/V First Tracks
1985 Cal 33-2
JimsCAL is online now  
post #5 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
One of None
 
deniseO30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bristol pa
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 72
Thanked 188 Times in 176 Posts
Rep Power: 14
   
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

Is that plywood in there???

"Next best thing to not having a boat? The knowledge from having one!" Denise, Bristol PA, On Tidal Delaware River, Anchor Yacht Club.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

My last project!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
deniseO30 is offline  
post #6 of 66 Old 08-27-2018 Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Lazerbrains's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: On a Boat
Posts: 877
Thanks: 10
Thanked 39 Times in 39 Posts
Rep Power: 4
 
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by deniseO30 View Post
Is that plywood in there???
Kinda looks like OSB, but could just be torn fiberglass matt/roving. Hard to tell from the photo. I can see the structural grid in the photos.
Lazerbrains is offline  
post #7 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
Senior Member
 
Guyfromthenorth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Northshore of Huron
Posts: 505
Thanks: 300
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Rep Power: 5
 
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

I'm not a GRP engineer by any stretch but I am surprised to see how cleanly the keel stub snapped off. You would think that (when properly engineered) the FG would have torn away up the hull a bit as it's supposed to be laid up in a way that disperses the load to a large area of the hull. I would picture it snapping off more like peeling a large sticker in any number of directions along the FG layers rather than snipping off almost cleanly like a matchstick.

Some youtube videos, nothing fancy


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Guyfromthenorth is offline  
post #8 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
One of None
 
deniseO30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Bristol pa
Posts: 7,932
Thanks: 72
Thanked 188 Times in 176 Posts
Rep Power: 14
   
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

Pics shows very small keel stub opening which makes me think it was a bulb keel and it was snapped off laterally. Guessing if a keel were wedge between two rocks, a few rocking actions port and starboard would probably snap it off in short order

"Next best thing to not having a boat? The knowledge from having one!" Denise, Bristol PA, On Tidal Delaware River, Anchor Yacht Club.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

My last project!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
deniseO30 is offline  
post #9 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
Administrator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 8,697
Thanks: 33
Thanked 417 Times in 348 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

As others have noted, this is a very unusual failure for a small keel root detachment failure. Normally, in these failures there is a large area of the laminate that is pulled loose, and often the hull is pulled free from the frame and pan. In this case the keel bolt washers (which are rectangular plates that span between each pair of bolts and are roughly 5/16" thick stainless steel which was compliant with the ABS standard at the time the boat was built but which should have been 7/16" under the current ISO 12215-9 standard) sheered through both the hull and pan, and sheered through the bottom of the transverse frame as well. I can't even visualize what directional force would cause that type of failure except fatigue at the edges of the plates taking a toll on the matrix and causing it to weaken to the point of failure.

The laminate in this area was all solid glass and was made up of uniaixial and biaxial fabric. The pan and frame structure is glued to the hull skin with an engineered adhesive. The tan color is probably that adhesive.

A hard grounding would have been expected to pull the forward bolts downward tearing them out of the hull and tearing the joint between the pan and the hull, and would have pushed aft edge of the keel up through the hull tearing the matrix back there. But in the photo there does not appear to be those kinds of compression marks aft the aft end of the keel. If the boat was run aground in a surf and was sideward to the waves, you would similarly expect one side to have sheered outward and torn the laminate outward and had a inward sheer failure on the opposite side of the keel. You would expect the transverse frame to be completely mushroomed on one side, but it does not appear to be the case. And if the boat was dropping vertically on hard bottom (similar to one of the contributing causes of the failure on the Cape Fear 38 some years ago) you would similarly expect to wide spread delamination and crushing of the frames.

To me the mystery here is the comparatively clean cut opening which almost suggests a failure mode where the boat was lifted vertically while its keel was held down some how. (I am not saying that actually happened just at first glance, that is how the damage looks).

But I am also interested in the fact that the boat in the picture looks like a 40.7. The construction and inspection during building of the keel attachment is outlined in the report on the sinking of the Cheeki Rafiki. https://assets.publishing.service.go...ort_8_2015.pdf

What was evident in the report was that the Beneteau 40.7's went through an extraordinary testing and inspection process compared to most production boats, with layup made up of precut laminate and the resin weighed. Hull thickness measured at each keel bolt hole on each boat, and each penetration on each boat with the coupons from through hulls tested for thickness and resin/reinforcing properties. And lastly the construction process is observed during construction by an independent testing company. That level of care just is not done on production boats.

And in the Annex C&D to the report, the Wolfson Unit, did a detailed analysis of the structure of these boats. https://assets.publishing.service.go...eekiRafiki.pdf

There is a chart with their results of the analysis. The table summarises the results of assessing the structure design, and concluding that depending on the element the design was between 1.05 to 7.96 in excess of the requirements of the standards when the Cheeki Rafiki was built, and that only the washer thickness would not comply with current standards. It also noted that Cheeki Rafiki was built differently than the original design, (and alegedly other 40.7's) and as built one of the designed keel bolts was missing. While that would have met the ABS standard of the day, it would only meet 95% of the current EU ISO 12215-9 standard.

And yet, with all of this care in design, construction, and with values exceeding the standards of today, this is the second of these boats to lose a keel.

One other interesting item in the Cheeki Rafiki report is a table looking at boats which have lost keels since 1984, which are summarized in Table 4 below.
Table 4: Summary of ISAF data on keel failures
Cause of failure Number
Undefined 40
Welded fin failures 11
Grounding or collision 8
Hull/internal structure 8
Keel bolts 3
Keel cant system 2
Total 72

Its interesting to me that over 20% of the failures are due to grounding, collision, or hull/internal structure failure, while 4% is was actually caused by keel bolt failure. That said, there were a number of keel bolt failures last year in older boats that would skew that number quite a bit.

Lastly, while these small root footprint keels are definitely more difficult engineering problem, over my lifetime, boats have been losing their keels no matter how long their keel root and how they were built. My family's CCA era Pearson Vanguard lost its encapsulated keel in 1970 due to a hard grounding. A number of IOR era boats lost their keels (Drum being the most famous) despite having a comparatively large keel root, and yes, newer designs are losing their keels as well, which is why World Sailing (AKA the former IYRU) is studying this issue as we speak, and hopefully will come up with better standards.

Jeff
Rezz and SV Irony like this.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay

Last edited by Jeff_H; 08-27-2018 at 02:00 PM.
Jeff_H is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff_H For This Useful Post:
Guyfromthenorth (08-27-2018)
post #10 of 66 Old 08-27-2018
Administrator
 
Jeff_H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Posts: 8,697
Thanks: 33
Thanked 417 Times in 348 Posts
Rep Power: 10
     
Re: Beneteau Keel bolts

Quote:
Originally Posted by celenoglu View Post
The safety factor for keel bolts is 7 or more. That means they can carry 7 times the load they are currently carrying.
I have to ask, how did you come up with this statement?

After all, when you say that keel bolts are designed to safety factor of 7 do you mean that in all loadings (static, steady-state and impact- whether vertical, lateral and from fore and aft) the keel bolts are designed to take 7 times the expected load?

Or are you saying that keel bolts are simply designed to carry 7 times the weight of the keel, regardless of the induced forces due to heeling and dynamic loads?

Are you saying as a fact that the keel bolts on this boat were designed to be 7 times stronger than the any of these loads?

Are you saying that ABS (which this boat was designed to) required a safety factor of 7 for the keel bolts (ABS didn't) or that the ISO standards require a safety factor of 7 for keel bolts (they don't)?

So what is it that you are trying to say?

Jeff


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Curmudgeon at Large- and rhinestone in the rough, sailing my Farr 11.6 on the Chesapeake Bay
Jeff_H is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

By choosing to post the reply above you agree to the rules you agreed to when joining Sailnet.
Click Here to view those rules.

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the SailNet Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
Please note: After entering 3 characters a list of Usernames already in use will appear and the list will disappear once a valid Username is entered.


User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problems with keel bolts on beneteau michael white Introduce Yourself 8 09-25-2015 04:58 PM
Beneteau 345 keel bolts brummytezza Gear & Maintenance 6 01-06-2012 09:05 AM
keel bolts & 1999 Beneteau 381 fsp421 Beneteau 5 06-07-2009 11:43 PM
beneteau keel bolts shmangasarian Gear & Maintenance 0 10-19-2005 06:46 AM
Beneteau 361 Keel Bolts Greentree Gear & Maintenance 4 09-15-2005 06:32 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome