Originally Posted by MastUndSchotbruch
That's what I said, sometimes they are preferable. Alarms is a good example.
I don't think that's really what the annex says. I think they mean if Vector Charts are available try to use vector charts, if vector charts are not available, raster charts are a reasonable alternative
Back to oil tankers, the Exxon Valdez was not operating in a shipping channel. It was avoiding ice bergs that were beleived to be in the channel. As far as I know, no electronic charts were fitted, but had vector charts been fitted, a contour alarm on a vector chart may have alerted the nav officer of the reef well in advance. RNCs don't normally do that sort of thing.
Here is some more from the annex:
"1.)*The Maritime Safety Committee, at its seventieth session (7 to 11 December 1998), adopted amendments to the performance standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information systems (ECDIS) to include the use of Raster Chart Display Systems (RCDS).
2.)*These amendments permit ECDIS equipment to operate in two modes:
2.1)*the ECDIS mode when ENC data is used; and
2.2)*the RCDS mode when ENC data is not available.
However, the RCDS mode does not have the full functionality of ECDIS, and can only be used together with an appropriate portfolio of up-to-date paper charts.
3.)*The mariners’ attention is therefore drawn to the following limitations of the RCDS mode:
3.1)*unlike ECDIS where there are no chart boundaries, RCDS is a chart-based system similar to a portfolio of paper charts;
3.2)*Raster navigational chart (RNC) data, itself, will not trigger automatic alarms (e.g. anti-grounding). However, some alarms can be generated by the RCDS from user-inserted information. These can include:
ship safety contour lines
3.3)*horizontal datums and chart projections may differ between RNCs. Mariners should understand how the chart horizontal datum relates to the datum of the position fixing system. In some instances, this may appear as a shift in position. This difference may be most noticeable at grid intersections and during route monitoring;
3.4)*chart features cannot be simplified or removed to suit a particular navigational circumstance or task at hand. This could affect the superimposition of radar/ARPA;
3.5)*without selecting different scale charts, the look-ahead capability may be somewhat limited. This may lead to some inconvenience when determining range and bearing or the identity of distant objects;
3.6)*orientation of the RDS display to other than chart-up, may affect the readability of chart text and symbols (e.g., course-up, route-up);
3.7)*it may not be possible to interrogate RNC features to gain additional information about charted objects;
3.8)*it is not possible to display a ship’s safety contour or safety depth and highlight it on the display, unless these features are manually entered during route planning;
3.9)*depending on the source of the RNC, different colours may be used to show similar chart information. There may also be differences in colours used during day and night-time;
3.10)*an RNC should be displayed at the scale of the paper chart. Excessive zooming in or zooming out can seriously degrade RCDS capability, for example, by degrading the legibility of the chart image; and
3.11)*mariners should be aware that in confined waters, the accuracy of chart data (i.e., paper charts, ENC or RNC data) may be less than that of the position-fixing system in use. This may be the case when using differential GNSS. ECDIS provides an indication in the ENC which allows a determination of the quality of the data"