I AM ONLY REPLYING TO THIS IN SOME DEPTH AS I AM CONCERNED THAT SOMEONE WILL READ THIS INFORMATION WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE DEPTH OF WHO WROTE IT.
Most (barring a couple of exceptions) of the replies on this thread have a disease called "gadgetitis" probably from reading and believing most of the crap espoused in sailing magazines.
Stay home please - if you want a shorebased life with all its amenities, then stay on shore. No wonder so many boats are put up for sale in the West Indies after a rough crossing of the Gulf Stream. All the gadgets in the world won't help you a jot when the S hits the F. Oh, sorry, thats not quite right is it. We can now just press a button and have someone come and rescue us from our own ineptness - like the "sailors" whom recently activated an EPIRB because they had ripped a sail and had run out of fuel. I would have thought knowing how to repair sails (contact cement will do at a pinch) and knowing how to "sail" without an engine is an automatic requirement for anyone sailing offshore, or coastal for that matter.
I do not apologise if I have upset anyone with this post. I am new to this forum, and relatively new to computers - so if I am breaking some etiquette, then so be it.
Inquire of Dave and Jaja Martin. They sailed around the world in a converted CAL 25, and when they had a couple kids they upgraded to a modest steel 33footer and sailed to the Arctic with not a radar, epirb, ssb, watermaker... etc in sight. They are out sailing while most of you lot are on computer forums crapping on about all the gear that, that in my opinion, you DON'T need.
Sorry, my meter is pegged.
After sitting and spending more time than I should have on how to respond to this thread(s), I will go against my gut instinct and discuss some of your comments. First of all, I do have a few questions/statements for you.
- You claim to be from Washington, so I am just curious why you are writing from New Zealand (PS, I pulled the exact address on your IP... ask your son what that means)?
- If you were a self made millionaire, why are you looking at a Contessa 32? I have never known anyone with financial means to buy such a vessel (and believe me, I know a LOT of 'millionaires'). There is nothing wrong with the boat per se, but there are certianly OTHER boats that would maintain the traditionalist sense you appear to be proposing.
- You are 54, supposedly. You retired at 40, supposedly. Yet, you said you sailed as a youngster 15 years ago. How did you manage to leap frog 30 years? Please tell me (maybe this is how you became a millionaire at 40??... I must have missed that patent). If you can only learn how to reverse it and go backwards, I think you might even make billionaire by 15, I mean 55.
- I have never in my life known a single person of financial independence (and I know a bunch), to put "self made millionaire" in their user page. I am not exactly sure who you are trying to impress here? Are yo uunder the assumption you are the only millionaire on this forum? Hmm. Better check the cost of some of these boats again.
- I am a little perplexed at your boat. You see, I did a search on Yachtworld, and there is not a single (not one) Contessa 32 available in the US. THere is one in Canada - but since it still has an engine in it (which you said was ripped out on the boat you are looking at to make space for sails or something... an absolutely brilliant move), I am curious how you came about this boat and where it actually lies (no pun intended)? I guess they are selling it on their own? And so you, as a millionaire, are going to actually consider buying a boat with no engine, no broker, no review of other boats, (and yes, no BS)? Thank God you found Sailnet first, eh?
- I have never heard a single person at 54 use the words "Sweet" to describe a boat. My 8 yo kid does, but not too many people past maturity. Sorry, just had to throw that out there.
- Let me understand another thing: You read a book once on how somebody sailed without any gadgets (as you put it), and because you sailed 15 years ago on a "small fixed keel boat" (using your words) when you were a youngster (at 40), you now understand the complexities of what is and what is not involved in passagemaking or cruising? And because you sailed a day sailor once 15 years ago you do not believe you need an engine? Just because Lin and Larry did it or Dave and Jaja (whoever they are), what makes you think YOU are good enough to do it?
- Most experienced cruisers KNOW their boats. That you would propose the question(s) on a Contessa 32 then spew your remarks on "gadgetitis" sounds kinda funny to me. In fact, whiplash comes to mind.
- How did you go cruising 20 years ago, if you did not retire until you were 40 (14 years ago) and learned to sail when you were a youngster 15 years ago? I am a bit confused.
- Last question: How is the weather in New Zealand today?
Most (barring a couple of exceptions) of the replies on this thread have a disease called "gadgetitis" probably from reading and believing most of the crap espoused in sailing magazines.
Stay home please - if you want a shorebased life with all its amenities, then stay on shore.
On the contrary, if you had taken the time to read the 685,000 posts (or if you had spent just a second more researching here than you did on the Contessa 32... a common mistake for new, unexperienced sailors), you would have realized that most of us have actually done what we talk about. Check the pictures here, or the blogs (better ask your kid what that means), or review some of the write-ups in magazines (the ones you despise). I have posted many pics and discussions of our experience alone, as have many of the other posters. We didn't get it from a magazine. We got it from experience. And even the very spartans of us suggest some of the very basics you dismiss as unecessary. Of course it helps when you have actually been to sea.
No wonder so many boats are put up for sale in the West Indies after a rough crossing of the Gulf Stream. All the gadgets in the world won't help you a jot when the S hits the F. Oh, sorry, thats not quite right is it.
And you know this, how? Have you ever even been outside the sight of land? Oh, I forgot. You sailed a small fixed keel when you were a youngster at 40.
Now, reality folks, from someone that actually has done it: Yes, this stuff does help you considerably. They makes life easier and can keep the crew more alert for when it really does get mean. For one thing, it is a bear self steering for hours on end. It wears a small crew down. If you can crawl under your dodger (especially when it is raining) and glance around while the boat steers herself (yes, James, even through storms), it is makes you more alert for when the boat cannot sail itself. SSB/weather fax can help you determine weather routing. When offshore, you can use the SSB to get updates and check in. Many of these gadgets, though not neccesary, do allow you to travel in considerably more safety for you, the crew, and for others out there. I don't care how many men you have on watch, if it is pea soup, you won't see a thing. Radar can help considerably with collision avoidance. Freighters can run 35kts and will be on you before you know it (especially when coming into busy harbors).
Oh, sorry, thats not quite right is it. We can now just press a button and have someone come and rescue us from our own ineptness - like the "sailors" whom recently activated an EPIRB because they had ripped a sail and had run out of fuel. I would have thought knowing how to repair sails (contact cement will do at a pinch) and knowing how to "sail" without an engine is an automatic requirement for anyone sailing offshore, or coastal for that matter.
No, you can't. Depends on where you are located actually. If you are far enough offshore, you are on your own, buddy. Unfortunately (and please take note of this), your cell phone gets poor coverage in the middle of the Atlantic/Pacific. Roaming fees may apply. As such, you might want to consider another way to get someone to come assist. THere is nothing wrong with assistance. Sailors have helped sailors since the beginning of time. Accidents happen. The trick is to practice the best seamanship you can (mileage may vary), and be as prepared and knowledgeable as you can so that you do not needlessly risk others lives.
Regarding your comment on Liferafts or whatever, opinoins vary. We carried one. We will again. I hated it and am happy to say that I wasted 5k on somthing I never used. My opinion might be different should I had not wasted that money on it. But I had a kiddo and felt a neccessity to provide as much of a safety net as possible. And for those that say that they will just use their dink, let me share with you that until you have been in a good storm offshore, you will not appreciate how little usefulness that dink will be seas are breaking around you. It is fair to say that if it brought down your boat, it won't do the dink much good either. Liferafts are made to bob along in those seas. They also carry supplies for basic survival and are (hopefully) easier to see from air than a dink or you treading water. But each sailor has to make their own decision on that on the safety level they are comfortable with.
- CD
PS James007 - This is M. I hope you can hear me. I find your opinion(s) uneducated and without merit. I encourage everyone to participate on this thread - whether they are accomplished sailors, newibies dreaming, or self made millionaires that sailed a small boat once 15 years ago. But I do find your arrogance, negativity, and nastiness unpalatable - which is why we are having this discussion in the open as you chose to do. So, and read this very carefully, if you have any interst in participating in this forum past 6 posts (the same forum you have been asking questions of while making fun of those that participate here), I reccomend you find a way to tone down the rhetoric, or 007 will be your last post, I will ban you from the sight, and I will permanently block you IP from even being able to view this place. This is M, over and out.