SailNet Community banner
1 - 3 of 3 Posts

Registered
Joined
4 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
We are considering a purchase of a Hunter 41 but have heard some concerns about the lack of a back stay. I realize that they have compensating by moving the side stays back, but I have concerns over the amount of pressure that could be put on the mast, on a free flow. I would like to hear from people who have had experience with the Hunter boats. This is the only concern, but I am not sure it really should be of a concern.

:)
 

bell ringer
Joined
5,565 Posts
It isn't a worry, I've pounded mine for years and the rig still is standing. There are 1000s of B&R rigged boats and cats without backstays around doing just fine.
 

Senior Member
Joined
19,485 Posts
Michael - I moved your post to a more appropriate forum. The other forum is mainly for technical issues with the site itself.

We have a similar rig setup - not as extreme as Hunter's, but I do have a backstay though it's not critical to keep the rig standing. I prefer to have some sort of backstay for peace of mind and mainsail trim control - the but 'trussed' rigidity of the Hunter's B&R rig probably negates any effect that a backstay might have if it was there. The rig allows for a large roach mainsail as well - without the inevitable interference you'd have with any backstay.

Hunter has sold many such boats, so I suppose they 'work', but my preference is for something more conventional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: michael white
1 - 3 of 3 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top