SailNet Community banner

1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
201 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Every now then I see fellow Sailnet member chided by their shipmates for either contibuting to old threads or (conversly) not starting a new thread for which an old one already exists. :rolleyes:

This appears a little hypoctical, but this contradiction can not be atttibuted to any one member. There just seems to be two strong opinions on the vaule of old posts and the contribution of content by others.

Personnally, I find the old posts valuable, and think those who elect to contribute to these older threads do a good service. First, they add depth of information. Secondly, it creates a longer scope of time on the topic that can reflect changes in trends, opinions, or technology.

Posting new (separate) threads on similar or identical topics also serves the forum well. It increases the thread population for a given topic (a good thing) and increases the likelihood that it will come into view of a person who could answer the post. Often, those with valuable answers for others come across these threads while they are serching for something else. A new thread or post will pop up as a new post and have a better chance of being viewed by the eyes of a sailor with an answer or comment.

Contibute to old posts, AND start new ones.
Member Opinions?
Moderators' Opinions?
 

·
Telstar 28
Joined
·
993 Posts
My main problem with people digging up dead threads, is that many are time-sensitive... looking for crew threads are a good example... if they're leaving in May 2001, any response after May 2001 is pretty much useless. Others are looking for parts type threads, and while not as time critical... if he hasn't gotten the parts to fix his autopilot/refrigerator/engine in two years, chances are likely that he replaced it.

Some threads, like what makes a good bluewater boat, or how to cross the gulf stream, are pretty much timeless and the date of the information doesn't really matter....as it is all applicable...

There's a difference.
 

·
Senior Member
Joined
·
19,488 Posts
I think it depends on the context of the reviving post... if it's in answer to a 6 year old question and it's pretty obvious that the poster didn't realize the the OP wasn't current, then I don't think there's anything wrong with a gentle reminder to check the dates of posts before responding. Another good indicator is the ratio of views to responses. A post with 600 views and 2 responses is likely long out of date.

But there's nothing wrong with "bumping" an old post to revive the discussion or to add something relevant. As Shack indicated, sometimes not doing so will produce a suggestion to search old topics before starting a new thread :rolleyes: Can't win sometimes.;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
118 Posts
Every now then I see fellow Sailnet member chided by their shipmates for either contibuting to old threads or (conversly) not starting a new thread for which an old one already exists. :rolleyes:

[redacted]

Personnally, I find the old posts valuable,
Contibute to old posts, AND start new ones.
Member Opinions?
Moderators' Opinions?
I agree that the old posts (information contained within) are extremely valuable. I was thinking that most threads should be automatically locked after say 6 months (excluding threads like THE PUB LIGHT IS ON, THE SONG THREAD, ETC.) with a moderator adding a post at the very end of the tread indicating that THIS THREAD IS CLOSED. AND perhaps... suggesting that the user could/should start a new thread if they didn't get the information they were seeking. The old thread could be referenced in the new thread???.

Just a thought.:)

Michele
 

·
I don't discuss my member
Joined
·
2,652 Posts
Reviving old threads violates accepted forum etiqutte, much like TYPING IN ALL CAPS or por speling an gramer. It just ain't done.
 

·
Telstar 28
Joined
·
993 Posts
Very true...but no one is talking about deleting anything...
Some of the old threads are irreplaceable. Robert Gainer's posts come immediately to mind.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
919 Posts
I agree that the old posts (information contained within) are extremely valuable. I was thinking that most threads should be automatically locked after say 6 months (excluding threads like THE PUB LIGHT IS ON, THE SONG THREAD, ETC.) with a moderator adding a post at the very end of the tread indicating that THIS THREAD IS CLOSED. AND perhaps... suggesting that the user could/should start a new thread if they didn't get the information they were seeking. The old thread could be referenced in the new thread???.

Just a thought.:)

Michele
I would respectfully disagee in that the threads are useful not only to the first person who posed the question but also to the others who find it later. I don't see the problem with leaving them open.
 

·
Irrationally Exuberant
Joined
·
1,422 Posts
Man, I get most of my info from other's threads. So seeing an old thread brought back because it is relevant to the person who resurrected it frequently does me a favor.

Time sensitive threads, as mentioned by others, are a different matter, and do make the resuscitater look clueless.
 

·
NON member
Joined
·
544 Posts
I agree that time-sensitive threads (looking for crew) shouldn't be revived but others might still be relevant years after their original posting.

As has been suggested sooooooooo many times, if a particular post bugs you, stay away from it.
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top