SailNet Community banner

1 - 20 of 59 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
42 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Hello!

I am looking to do a bit more extended cruising, and am concerned about collision avoidance. I am considering two solutions:

1. Radar unit installed on the mast
- Very expensive, have to unstep mast, etc
- I don't want to put a stern mounted pole on my boat
- May not be able to fix it myself if it breaks

...or...

2. Adding an AIS class B send/receive to a chartplotter
- Much cheaper, can install myself, can buy those new sails sooner, etc

I realize radar is the 'gold standard' for collision avoidance, but is it still necessary? It is my understanding that cargo ships must transmit AIS info, and so it should be as good or better at finding the big boys, while smaller ships without AIS may not show up on radar either.

My feeling is that AIS along with the standard 15 minute visual check should be a comfortable level of safety while cruising -- and that even with RADAR it wouldn't be safe to skip the visual check.

...so is option 2 enough? Or should I bite the bullet and shell out for option 1?

Your opinions are appreciated.

Regards,

--
Joe
 

·
Sea Dweeb
Joined
·
143 Posts
While AIS is a nice tool you are presuming that ALL vessels in your transit are is participating. This is probably not the case. AIS depends on the participation of others to provide information to you.

Radar is an active instrument giving you a real time image of objects around you. While there are situations wherein objects may be masked on radar it is fewer occasions than a vessel not having AIS. A properly tuned, quality radar system will display some pretty small objects. I routinely see fishing floats at greater than a mile out.

You don't really need a "pole" if you don't want it. There are mounts that fix to the backstay.

If it came to a choice of a chart plotter or radar I'd choose radar. Inshore you can navigate by radar a chart plotter won't tell you that you are about to be run down by that cigarette boat.
 

·
Aquaholic
Joined
·
1,139 Posts
When all the buoys, islands, drunken stinkpotters, etv have AIS, then maybe.

I can say that in an unfamiliar area, RADAR is an absolute essential navigational AID, just like GPS, charts, binoculars, and a rested and sober mind.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,705 Posts
When there is a fog down and you are sailing between a few dozen islands/rocks, AIS is as good as tits on a rain barrel.

Go for radar.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,249 Posts
I am putting radar on my boat after being out on the Chesapeake last fall when suddenly a pea soup fog came down as I was approaching the Bay Bridge. Couldnt see ANYTHING. Sure, the chartplotter told me where it thought I was but a radar can not only show you those landmarks for REAL but also where the other boats/ships are. Freighters move fast enough that if you wait until you can see them in a fog you may well already be toast.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
Comparing Radar to AIS is not really very valid. You did not describe the type and location of sailing you plan on. If you are sailing in areas that have limited fog, then Radar is much less of a must. Boats have been cruising for a long time without Radar. It is only in the last 10-15 years or so where small Radar prices have come down so much that many more boats have Radar. On an overnight passage it is nice to be able to turn on the Radar and see whats out there and what way they are going. Get caught in fog a few times and you'll see the value very quickly.
AIS prices have come down so much that it is a nice safety feature, independent of Radar. Most can be left on continuously with a much lower current draw than Radar.

Paul L
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
42 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
Comparing Radar to AIS is not really very valid. You did not describe the type and location of sailing you plan on.
Fair point, sorry.

I sail San Francisco bay and the surrounding coastal areas. I am a desk jockey during the work week, so I only occasionally cruise. I am looking at making some longer trips this year, to places such as Catalina Island (~450nm) when I can get some vacation and am thinking about changes I need to make to the boat.

It looks like I can get an AIS send/receive along with a little plotter display from for about $1300, and be able to install it myself. RADAR is more like $3000+ for an entry unit, and uses significantly more power as was pointed out. (right now the boat uses almost no energy, and it would be nice to keep it that way)

So, RADAR users out there: Do you leave it on all the time? Or just for the occasional check?

Thanks,

Joe
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,889 Posts
Used to teach sailing on SF Bay (Cass Sailing Marina, Sausalito). I remember all those times sailing in thick fog and nasty rainy conditions. Radar would be a very valuable addition.

For coastal cruising as well, radar is a wonderful tool. In fact, experienced navigators would likely rate it as the 3rd or 4th most important navigational tool aboard, after the compass and fathometer!

You can't really compare AIS to radar. AIS is a passive device which displays information about boats which transmit an AIS signal. Not all boats. In fact, only some large commercial vessels. Not fishing boats. Not yachts. Not runabouts. Not sailboats. Not buoys. Not islands or coasts or rocks. Not storm systems.

Guess as an older navigator I'm not much enchanted with AIS. For many, I think it could be a distraction, luring them into a sense of comfort by displaying information on a screen about SOME large vessels, while distracting them from using the most important navigational tool of all: the Mark I eyeball :)

Bill
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
191 Posts
Joe,
Sounds like you are looking at an AIS receive/transmit system. When I said cheap, I was referring to the receive only units.

You can get into a low-end Radar only for a lot less than $3k these days. Make it a radar chart plotter, 4kw, etc then the price goes way up. A Furuno 2kw unit with a 6in B&W LCD display is around $1,350. The radar install is more time consuming. Given where you sail and your plans, radar would be nice.

Paul L
 

·
Senior Member
Joined
·
19,489 Posts
We've just returned from a week's sailing in Mexico on a boat with a chartplotter, latest available "charts" and radar. The official charts of the Mexican coast are appallingly bad.... every where we anchored the plotter showed us to be up to a 1/2 nm "inland".

Making a landfall (or simply negotiating a group of islets or a headland) in the dark in this region without radar would be scary as hell. Radar is so much more than a tool for collision avoidance with another vessel.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,000 Posts
Flat out, I would rank radar over almost everything, including a chart plotter. I would rank it over a wind indicator. I might rank it over speed, not depth though.

AIS is only good for ships. You will use your radar for COUNTLESS things outside of ships - from storms to oil rigs, to markers, to other (smaller) boats. THe list is too vast to name out everything.

You can get by without radar, but at those times when you need it, you will really wish you had it. AIS ranks at the very bottom of the things I would prioritize.

Brian
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
26 Posts
Yeah, just take the extra half step and go with Radar, well worth it, you won't regret it. As said before, one harbor entry in fog makes it worth it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
262 Posts
I have had radar on my boat for 10 years and it has probably only been used 20 times, but it makes life a lot more comfortable for those critical times than anything else....at night (to see other ships, boats and marks), in the fog (to see everything else), in the Chesapeake bay to see other boats in overnight races; however, if I didn't sail at night and was only in the Chesapeake Bay, it's not worth it.

Moe
 

·
Wandering Aimlessly
Joined
·
22,037 Posts
Neither is mandatory, but if you're going to add one or the other, definite radar. In two years, I've only really needed it once, but managed to get by without it.
 

·
I'd rather be sailing
Joined
·
1,903 Posts
Yes, yes and yes. Radar is indispensable. You never realize how much so until you actually need it and use it. I would highly recommend getting a heading sensor (or other hardware necessary) in order to be able to use MARPA. MARPA will allow you to mark and track radar targets, bearings and speed. You only need to be out in the fog or night (on purpose or without choice) once to understand its usefulness.
 

·
Courtney the Dancer
Joined
·
3,971 Posts
I assume you have gotten the message by now, but I will add one more stick to the pile. I am debating adding a second radar to the boat. Nuff said.
 
1 - 20 of 59 Posts
Top