SailNet Community banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
6 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I need to purchase an outboard for my (new to me) 1973 Pearson 26. I know a long shaft is recommended to help keep the prop in the water when the waves are up. But, after looking at the CAD drawings of the P26 rudder on Dan Pfeiffer’s site, I have to wonder if a long shaft might get in the way of the rudder. The rudder flares back beyond the transom a bit.

I took a tape measure and measured from the top of the transom down to where I could feel the rudder directly below. The best I can tell, there seems to be about 30” to 31” of clearance before I hit the rudder.

Anyone know if a 20” long shaft engine when mounted, would measure less than 30” from the mounting bracket to the bottom of the skeg? Or is there too much difference between the models? (I’m looking at purchasing a 2008 Nissan 9.9 long shaft (20”). And yes, I know that outboard is worth about as much as the boat is.) None of the outboard MFG sites have that measurement listed.

Any advice would be appreciated!

Thanks!

blizzman
 

·
Bender of Nails
Joined
·
66 Posts
Welcome to the forum Blizz.

Will the rudder still hit it if the bracket is mounted to one side rather than centered on the transom ?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Thanks for the welcome, Deadeye.

That's a possibility, although there's not much room to shift the engine left or right within the mouting area. I'll have to take a look - a couple of inches might make a big difference.

Thanks again.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
223 Posts
Outboard shaft length

Outboard shaft length is measured from the point inside the clamp where the transom would sit, to the bottom of the cavitation plate. A long shaft may have two plates, so it is naturally the lower of these. The rest of the lower leg, prop, etc. are not included in this measurement, which could run 8" to 10" depending on the specific motor. Your boat has a large cutout in the transom as a motor mount, does it not? If so, remember that your entire motor sits as much as a foot closer the actual hull than it would if it was on a lifting type bracket. This means that it is much less likely to ever come out of the water in rough seas than one on a bracket.

I know that there are those who say that you absolutely, positively must have a long shaft motor on any sailboat. I have actual real life experience that says otherwise. Way back when I had a Cat 22 I had a LS on a bracket off the transom, and even then it would indeed come out of the water in heading into big swells. Since then I have also owned 2 other boats that had transom cutouts and have used a variety of short shaft motors with absolutely zero problems in over 15 years and many, many miles of all sorts of waves, chop, swell and headwinds. Another benefit is that the leg won't drag in the water when sailing fast with the motor tilted up, as it surely will with your mounting point and a long shaft.

My advice would be a short shaft, but if you want a longshaft, find one and actually measure it carefully first.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
994 Posts
Its approx 34" from where the outboard sits on the transom to the bottom of the skeg. (on a 6hp johnson sailmaster longshaft)

I just built a "test tank" to run my outboard in and needed this measurement to make sure it would fit without touching the bottom.

A short shaft would probably be ur best bet.
 

·
ASA and PSIA Instructor
Joined
·
4,298 Posts
I would think 9.9HP a lot more engine that the P26 would need, I'd think a 6HP all that is needed, the extra 4 horse would represent only money spent for no usability. Get the long shaft IF it will in fact fit.
 

·
Hinterhoeller HR28
Joined
·
163 Posts
I'd borrow a motor, and hang it on the boat, and see how well it clears. Anything else is speculation. Easy enough to do out of the water.

Our boat has the OB in the lazarette. Originally was a short shaft. That made it possible to be tilted out of the water when racing. I have since gone with a long shaft 9.8 Nissan, and don't tilt. Definitely stays in the water better in the long swells of Lake Ontario. Don't notice much increased drag, though I'm sure it's there.

Regarding 6 hp vs 9.9, etc... All new small OB's in the US will be 4-strokers. In the Tohatsu/Nissan/Mercury lineup, the 4/5/6 family is a one-cylinder. The 8/9.8 family is a 2-cylinder, and available as electric start if desired. At idle, the 2-cylinder units are much smoother. As a Tohatsu dealer/mechanic, I would opt for the 8 or 9.8 if buying a new 4-stroke. Remember that Tohatsu makes the Tohatsu, Nissan, and Mercury (30 hp and under) OB's. Only difference is brand recognition and price. Oh, yeah, our HR28 could use a bigger motor than the 9.8, but the next family up is the 15, which weighs 30 pounds more, and is Huge. The 9.8 is adequate, don't get me wrong, but I have seldom seen a sailboat with too much aux power when a storm is on.
 

·
ASA and PSIA Instructor
Joined
·
4,298 Posts
... All new small OB's in the US will be 4-strokers. In the Tohatsu/Nissan/Mercury lineup, the 4/5/6 family is a one-cylinder. The 8/9.8 family is a 2-cylinder, and available as electric start if desired. ...
This is interesting info about the current generation of OBs...nothing like having an expert chip in. Your information about the 6HP being a single cylinder is surprising and disappointing...I have not been much of a fan of the switch to 4 cycle motors...more wieght/more cost/less power. It all makes me treasure even more the Tohatsu 8HP 2 cycle I have on my RIB.


All given, I'd say look hard for a used 2 cycle 8HP rather than pay the cost and live with the weight of a new 9.9.
 

·
aspiring sailor
Joined
·
22 Posts
I sail a '76 P26 with a Johnson 9.9 hp long shaft (20"). With the motor straight up - no tilt - the skeg will impede the rudder slightly if I am running at full throttle. If I adjust the tilt slightly (a peg or two), or do not run wide open, I have no problem. I definitely would not go with a smaller (less hp) motor.
Even with the long shaft the bottom of the motor comes out of the water in steep chop; this can be minimized by "going with the chop" (not quite sure how else to say that).
 

·
Ticon 30
Joined
·
162 Posts
I also sail a P26 (1975) and have a 1984 Evinrude 20" shaft.
It clears the rudder by an inch or so.
If you go lower horsepower, I wouldn't go any lower than 8. Perhaps a 8hp 4 stroke would be a good option
 

·
Hinterhoeller HR28
Joined
·
163 Posts
This is interesting info about the current generation of OBs...nothing like having an expert chip in. Your information about the 6HP being a single cylinder is surprising and disappointing...I have not been much of a fan of the switch to 4 cycle motors...more wieght/more cost/less power. It all makes me treasure even more the Tohatsu 8HP 2 cycle I have on my RIB.


All given, I'd say look hard for a used 2 cycle 8HP rather than pay the cost and live with the weight of a new 9.9.
I don't want to start a 2-stroke vs 4-stroke rampage, but as a Tohatsu dealer/mechanic, I can offer these thoughts:

The old 50:1 pre-mix 2-smoke engines are excellent for their intended applications. Ours seemed like it would run forever, and the new owner likes it a lot. They are definitely lighter (size for size), but they are noisy, smokey, and burn fuel like crazy. And they do go through plugs faster, too.

As I mentioned, I replaced our 1974 OMC 15 with a new Nissan 9.8 4-stroke, and couldn't be happier. Much quieter, uses half the fuel, no smoke, no oil to buy and mix, and no annual change of points. Since we have it in the lazarette, we use remote controls, so the electric choke is a big plus. The old 15 did not have that option, so I had to run an additional choke cable for the old motor, and needed both hands to start -- one for the key, and one for the choke. Of course, this is not apples to apples -- heck, it's not even apples to broccoli. They are completely different design generations, as well as different combustion technologies.

Thanks to the Solas high-thrust prop, we have better thrust with the 9.8 than the 15 ever had... and it BACKS UP now. That's something the old setup just did not do well. Because of the better thrust, we actually saved weight, by going down one motor family size. The new 8/9.8 family is lighter than the old 9.9/15 family.

Each setup is different. In our particular case, on this particular boat, the 4-stroke was the way to go. I like the simplicity and weight of the 2-smokes. I have one on the dinghy, and intend to keep it "forever". If our sailboat aux was out on a bracket, the 4-stroke would lose many of the advantages it has in the lazarette...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Wow! Thanks to everyone for the excellent feedback. Very helpful.
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
Top